Phenomenological–based strategy for the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model parameters identification

IF 2.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Bensaada , A. Imad , T. Kanit , A. EL Moumen , M. Almansba , A. Saouab
{"title":"Phenomenological–based strategy for the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model parameters identification","authors":"R. Bensaada ,&nbsp;A. Imad ,&nbsp;T. Kanit ,&nbsp;A. EL Moumen ,&nbsp;M. Almansba ,&nbsp;A. Saouab","doi":"10.1016/j.apples.2025.100243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman GTN model is widely used for ductile fracture simulations. However, the selection of its parameters is often done randomly to reproduce the experimental data without considering the physical consistency of the set of parameters selected. This contribution is dedicated to the relevance of the GTN model parameters selection using a consistent method based on the ductile fracture phenomenology.</div><div>The proposed method consists of the prioritization of the void volume fraction parameters in accordance with the kinetics of the ductile fracture phenomenon, while the nucleation and fracture parameters are chosen in conformity to the strength to fracture. Experimental data obtained from 12NC6 steel is used through various tests. Axisymmetric notched and compact tension specimens are used. The interest of the use of this variety of tests lies in the variation of stress triaxiality ratio given its widely proven importance in the ductile fracture process. The strategy is finally applied to a CT (Compact-Tension) test simulation. Satisfactory result are achieved while the number of attempts to reproduce the experimental data is considerably reduced, this lead to considerable saving of computational time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72251,"journal":{"name":"Applications in engineering science","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in engineering science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266649682500041X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman GTN model is widely used for ductile fracture simulations. However, the selection of its parameters is often done randomly to reproduce the experimental data without considering the physical consistency of the set of parameters selected. This contribution is dedicated to the relevance of the GTN model parameters selection using a consistent method based on the ductile fracture phenomenology.
The proposed method consists of the prioritization of the void volume fraction parameters in accordance with the kinetics of the ductile fracture phenomenon, while the nucleation and fracture parameters are chosen in conformity to the strength to fracture. Experimental data obtained from 12NC6 steel is used through various tests. Axisymmetric notched and compact tension specimens are used. The interest of the use of this variety of tests lies in the variation of stress triaxiality ratio given its widely proven importance in the ductile fracture process. The strategy is finally applied to a CT (Compact-Tension) test simulation. Satisfactory result are achieved while the number of attempts to reproduce the experimental data is considerably reduced, this lead to considerable saving of computational time.
Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman模型参数辨识的现象学策略
Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman GTN模型广泛用于韧性断裂模拟。然而,其参数的选择往往是随机的,以再现实验数据,而不考虑所选参数集的物理一致性。这一贡献致力于使用基于韧性断裂现象学的一致方法选择GTN模型参数的相关性。提出的方法是根据韧性断裂现象的动力学来优选孔隙体积分数参数,而根据断裂强度来选择成核和断裂参数。实验数据来源于12NC6钢,通过各种试验得到。采用轴对称缺口和压实拉伸试样。鉴于应力三轴比在韧性断裂过程中的重要性已被广泛证实,使用各种试验的兴趣在于应力三轴比的变化。最后将该策略应用于CT (Compact-Tension)试验仿真。在得到满意结果的同时,大大减少了再现实验数据的尝试次数,从而大大节省了计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applications in engineering science
Applications in engineering science Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信