Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Periodontal Disease From Intraoral Photographs: A Systematic Review

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kaijing Mao , Khaing Myat Thu , Kuo Feng Hung , Ollie Yiru Yu , Richard Tai-Chiu Hsung , Walter Yu-Hang Lam
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Periodontal Disease From Intraoral Photographs: A Systematic Review","authors":"Kaijing Mao ,&nbsp;Khaing Myat Thu ,&nbsp;Kuo Feng Hung ,&nbsp;Ollie Yiru Yu ,&nbsp;Richard Tai-Chiu Hsung ,&nbsp;Walter Yu-Hang Lam","doi":"10.1016/j.identj.2025.100883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review aims to evaluate the methodological characteristics and clinical performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in detecting periodontal disease using digital intraoral photographs. This review includes peer-reviewed publications and conference proceedings in English, focusing on clinical studies of human periodontal diseases. Intraoral photographs served as the primary data source, with fluorescent and microscopic dental images excluded. The methodological characteristics and performance metrics of clinical studies reporting on AI models were analysed. Twenty-six studies met the review criteria. Various image acquisition devices were used by the resarchers including professional cameras, intraoral cameras, smartphones, and home-use devices. Ten studies used clinical examinations as reference methods, while 16 used visual examinations. Eight studies involved multiple experts in dataset annotation. Only 9 studies employed multiple intraoral views for their AI models, with the remaining studies focusing solely on the frontal view. Regarding AI tasks, 17 studies used classification, 4 used detection, and 5 used segmentations. Performance metrics varied widely and were assessed at multiple levels. Classification studies showed accuracies ranging from 0.46 to 1.00, detection studies showed accuracies from 0.56 to 0.78, and segmentation studies achieved Intersection over Union (IoU) scores of 0.43 to 0.70. AI models show potential for detecting periodontal disease from intraoral photographs, but their clinical use faces challenges. Future research should focus on improving reporting standards, standardising evaluation metrics, performing external tests, enhancing data quality, and using clinical gold standards as reference methods. Furthermore, efforts should focus on promoting transparency, integrating ethical considerations, minimising misclassification, and advancing the development of explainable and user-friendly AI systems to enhance their clinical applicability and reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13785,"journal":{"name":"International dental journal","volume":"75 5","pages":"Article 100883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653925001728","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review aims to evaluate the methodological characteristics and clinical performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in detecting periodontal disease using digital intraoral photographs. This review includes peer-reviewed publications and conference proceedings in English, focusing on clinical studies of human periodontal diseases. Intraoral photographs served as the primary data source, with fluorescent and microscopic dental images excluded. The methodological characteristics and performance metrics of clinical studies reporting on AI models were analysed. Twenty-six studies met the review criteria. Various image acquisition devices were used by the resarchers including professional cameras, intraoral cameras, smartphones, and home-use devices. Ten studies used clinical examinations as reference methods, while 16 used visual examinations. Eight studies involved multiple experts in dataset annotation. Only 9 studies employed multiple intraoral views for their AI models, with the remaining studies focusing solely on the frontal view. Regarding AI tasks, 17 studies used classification, 4 used detection, and 5 used segmentations. Performance metrics varied widely and were assessed at multiple levels. Classification studies showed accuracies ranging from 0.46 to 1.00, detection studies showed accuracies from 0.56 to 0.78, and segmentation studies achieved Intersection over Union (IoU) scores of 0.43 to 0.70. AI models show potential for detecting periodontal disease from intraoral photographs, but their clinical use faces challenges. Future research should focus on improving reporting standards, standardising evaluation metrics, performing external tests, enhancing data quality, and using clinical gold standards as reference methods. Furthermore, efforts should focus on promoting transparency, integrating ethical considerations, minimising misclassification, and advancing the development of explainable and user-friendly AI systems to enhance their clinical applicability and reliability.
人工智能在口腔内照片检测牙周病中的应用:系统综述
本系统综述旨在评估人工智能(AI)模型在使用数字口内照片检测牙周病方面的方法学特征和临床表现。本综述包括同行评议的出版物和英文会议记录,重点是人类牙周病的临床研究。口腔内照片作为主要数据来源,不包括荧光和显微牙齿图像。分析了人工智能模型临床研究报告的方法学特征和性能指标。26项研究符合审查标准。研究人员使用了各种图像采集设备,包括专业相机、口腔内相机、智能手机和家用设备。10项研究采用临床检查作为参考方法,16项研究采用目视检查。8项研究涉及多名数据集注释专家。只有9项研究在其人工智能模型中使用了多个口内视图,其余研究仅关注正面视图。关于人工智能任务,17项研究使用分类,4项研究使用检测,5项研究使用分割。绩效指标差异很大,并在多个层面进行评估。分类研究的准确率在0.46 ~ 1.00之间,检测研究的准确率在0.56 ~ 0.78之间,分割研究的IoU得分在0.43 ~ 0.70之间。人工智能模型显示出从口腔内照片检测牙周病的潜力,但其临床应用面临挑战。未来的研究应侧重于改进报告标准、标准化评价指标、进行外部测试、提高数据质量以及使用临床金标准作为参考方法。此外,应注重提高透明度,整合伦理考虑,尽量减少错误分类,推进可解释和用户友好的人工智能系统的发展,以提高其临床适用性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International dental journal
International dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The International Dental Journal features peer-reviewed, scientific articles relevant to international oral health issues, as well as practical, informative articles aimed at clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信