Agroecological impacts of crop residue burning: A qualitative systematic review of direct and inferred evidence

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ashiq Parambil-Peedika , Alison Laing , Mahesh Kumar Gathala , Adeeth A.G. Cariappa , Vijesh V. Krishna
{"title":"Agroecological impacts of crop residue burning: A qualitative systematic review of direct and inferred evidence","authors":"Ashiq Parambil-Peedika ,&nbsp;Alison Laing ,&nbsp;Mahesh Kumar Gathala ,&nbsp;Adeeth A.G. Cariappa ,&nbsp;Vijesh V. Krishna","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread adoption of mechanized crop harvesting in cereal-based production systems and limited turnaround time between cropping seasons have made crop residue burning a prevalent time-saving practice. Despite its well-documented environmental and health consequences, how residue burning affects agrobiodiversity and ecosystem functions remains underexplored. This qualitative systematic review includes a total of 250 peer-reviewed studies, of which 41 examined the direct effects of residue burning, and 209 focused on broader air pollution impacts as inferential evidence, of which 134 publications focused on arthropods and 75 on birds. From the 233 recorded trait instances across the studied species, about 40 % showed a negative response to residue burning, indicating improved biodiversity responses to alternative residue management practices, such as retention, incorporation, and manual or mechanical removal. Residue burning negatively affected natural predators but favored parasitic nematodes and rodent pests. More studies are required to better characterize the functional responses of important species across various agroecosystems. The decline in soil biodiversity and beneficial species due to residue burning significantly diminishes the ecosystem services these biodiversity components provide, ultimately threatening long-term system productivity. Arthropods and birds, which play critical ecological roles in agroecosystems, may also be adversely affected by residue burning. However, very few air pollution studies have explicitly examined the impact of residue burning on higher taxa. Findings from broader air pollution studies, used here as secondary evidence, offer valuable inferential insights into the potential ecological impacts of crop residue burning on birds and arthropods, mediated through changes in air quality. Despite these documented consequences, agrobiodiversity considerations are largely absent from policy discussions on residue management. Our findings highlight the urgent need for a comprehensive assessment of the ecological impacts of crop residue burning on biodiversity and associated ecosystem services to inform biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation efforts to ensure sustainability of agricultural systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"994 ","pages":"Article 179963"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725016031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread adoption of mechanized crop harvesting in cereal-based production systems and limited turnaround time between cropping seasons have made crop residue burning a prevalent time-saving practice. Despite its well-documented environmental and health consequences, how residue burning affects agrobiodiversity and ecosystem functions remains underexplored. This qualitative systematic review includes a total of 250 peer-reviewed studies, of which 41 examined the direct effects of residue burning, and 209 focused on broader air pollution impacts as inferential evidence, of which 134 publications focused on arthropods and 75 on birds. From the 233 recorded trait instances across the studied species, about 40 % showed a negative response to residue burning, indicating improved biodiversity responses to alternative residue management practices, such as retention, incorporation, and manual or mechanical removal. Residue burning negatively affected natural predators but favored parasitic nematodes and rodent pests. More studies are required to better characterize the functional responses of important species across various agroecosystems. The decline in soil biodiversity and beneficial species due to residue burning significantly diminishes the ecosystem services these biodiversity components provide, ultimately threatening long-term system productivity. Arthropods and birds, which play critical ecological roles in agroecosystems, may also be adversely affected by residue burning. However, very few air pollution studies have explicitly examined the impact of residue burning on higher taxa. Findings from broader air pollution studies, used here as secondary evidence, offer valuable inferential insights into the potential ecological impacts of crop residue burning on birds and arthropods, mediated through changes in air quality. Despite these documented consequences, agrobiodiversity considerations are largely absent from policy discussions on residue management. Our findings highlight the urgent need for a comprehensive assessment of the ecological impacts of crop residue burning on biodiversity and associated ecosystem services to inform biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation efforts to ensure sustainability of agricultural systems.

Abstract Image

作物残茬焚烧对农业生态的影响:直接和推断证据的定性系统综述
在以谷物为基础的生产系统中广泛采用机械化作物收割,并且种植季节之间的周转时间有限,这使得作物秸秆焚烧成为一种普遍的节省时间的做法。尽管焚烧剩余物对环境和健康的影响有据可查,但其对农业生物多样性和生态系统功能的影响仍未得到充分探讨。这一定性系统综述共包括250项同行评议的研究,其中41项研究了残留物燃烧的直接影响,209项研究将更广泛的空气污染影响作为推论证据,其中134项研究节肢动物,75项研究鸟类。在研究物种中记录的233个性状实例中,约40%对残留物燃烧表现出负面反应,表明生物多样性对其他残留物管理措施(如保留、合并和手动或机械清除)的响应有所改善。焚烧剩余物对天敌不利,但对线虫和啮齿动物有利。需要更多的研究来更好地表征不同农业生态系统中重要物种的功能响应。残渣焚烧导致土壤生物多样性和有益物种的减少,大大减少了这些生物多样性组成部分提供的生态系统服务,最终威胁到系统的长期生产力。在农业生态系统中扮演重要生态角色的节肢动物和鸟类也可能受到焚烧的不利影响。然而,很少有空气污染研究明确考察了秸秆燃烧对高等分类群的影响。本文将更广泛的空气污染研究结果作为次要证据,为通过空气质量变化介导的作物秸秆焚烧对鸟类和节肢动物的潜在生态影响提供了有价值的推断性见解。尽管有这些记录在案的后果,但在关于残留物管理的政策讨论中基本上没有考虑农业生物多样性。我们的研究结果强调,迫切需要全面评估作物秸秆焚烧对生物多样性和相关生态系统服务的生态影响,为生物多样性保护和气候减缓工作提供信息,以确保农业系统的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信