Valoración del uso de casos clínicos orales como herramienta evaluativa en el desarrollo de la competencia diagnóstica en situaciones de salud en estudiantes de Semiología Médica II

Q2 Social Sciences
Nathalia Salazar-Falla , Paula María Tello Cabrales
{"title":"Valoración del uso de casos clínicos orales como herramienta evaluativa en el desarrollo de la competencia diagnóstica en situaciones de salud en estudiantes de Semiología Médica II","authors":"Nathalia Salazar-Falla ,&nbsp;Paula María Tello Cabrales","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2025.101078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The assessment of diagnostic competence in health situations is essential in medical education, but traditional strategies often limit the development of critical thinking. This study analyzes the use of oral clinical cases as an assessment tool to enhance this competence in students of Medical Semiotics II.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methods study with an intrinsic and interpretative case study design was conducted with 80 fifth-semester medical students at Universidad Icesi. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, focus groups, evaluation rubrics, and non-participant observation. Data analysis was categorical, allowing key patterns to be identified from various sources.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The strategy promoted skills such as metacognition and clinical reasoning. Students positively valued immediate feedback, while faculty members highlighted its practical applicability. Logistical challenges and the need to establish standardized evaluation criteria were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Oral clinical cases are an effective strategy for formative assessment in medical education, fostering diagnostic competencies in real-life scenarios and strengthening skills such as clinical reasoning and reflection. Immediate feedback was identified as a key element in recognizing strengths and areas for improvement. However, standardizing evaluation criteria and enhancing faculty training are necessary to optimize the impact of this strategy on medical education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 5","pages":"Article 101078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181325000567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The assessment of diagnostic competence in health situations is essential in medical education, but traditional strategies often limit the development of critical thinking. This study analyzes the use of oral clinical cases as an assessment tool to enhance this competence in students of Medical Semiotics II.

Methods

A mixed-methods study with an intrinsic and interpretative case study design was conducted with 80 fifth-semester medical students at Universidad Icesi. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, focus groups, evaluation rubrics, and non-participant observation. Data analysis was categorical, allowing key patterns to be identified from various sources.

Results

The strategy promoted skills such as metacognition and clinical reasoning. Students positively valued immediate feedback, while faculty members highlighted its practical applicability. Logistical challenges and the need to establish standardized evaluation criteria were identified.

Conclusion

Oral clinical cases are an effective strategy for formative assessment in medical education, fostering diagnostic competencies in real-life scenarios and strengthening skills such as clinical reasoning and reflection. Immediate feedback was identified as a key element in recognizing strengths and areas for improvement. However, standardizing evaluation criteria and enhancing faculty training are necessary to optimize the impact of this strategy on medical education.
评价医学符号学二专业学生在发展健康状况诊断能力方面使用口腔临床病例作为评估工具的情况
在医学教育中,评估健康状况下的诊断能力是必不可少的,但传统的策略往往限制了批判性思维的发展。本研究分析使用口腔临床案例作为评估工具,以提高医学符号学II学生的这一能力。方法采用混合方法对80名伊塞西大学医学院五学期学生进行了本征性和解释性案例研究。通过半结构化访谈、焦点小组、评估标准和非参与性观察收集数据。数据分析是分类的,允许从各种来源识别关键模式。结果该策略提高了元认知和临床推理能力。学生们积极评价即时反馈,而教师们则强调了它的实用性。会议确定了后勤方面的挑战和建立标准化评价标准的必要性。结论口腔临床案例是医学教育形成性评价的有效手段,可培养学生在现实生活情境中的诊断能力,增强学生的临床推理和反思能力。即时反馈被认为是识别优势和需要改进的领域的关键因素。然而,规范评价标准和加强师资培训是优化这一战略对医学教育影响的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信