Krystal A Tolley, Graham J Alexander, Isabelle C Winder, Claire Dobson, Cara Hall, Axel Barlow, Elysha McBride, Jens Reissig, Jean-François Trape, Zoltan T Nagy, Catharine Wüster, Wolfgang Wüster
{"title":"Phylogeny and species delimitation in an iconic snake genus: the African mambas (Serpentes: Elapidae: Dendroaspis)","authors":"Krystal A Tolley, Graham J Alexander, Isabelle C Winder, Claire Dobson, Cara Hall, Axel Barlow, Elysha McBride, Jens Reissig, Jean-François Trape, Zoltan T Nagy, Catharine Wüster, Wolfgang Wüster","doi":"10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The African mambas (Dendroaspis) comprise an iconic genus of four large-bodied, highly venomous elapid snakes: the black mamba (D. polylepis) from open formations across sub-Saharan Africa is comprised of two allopatric populations, and three species of green mamba (D. angusticeps, D. jamesoni, and D. viridis) from tropical and sub-tropical forests. Dendroaspis angusticeps occurs in multiple isolated forest patches, and the presence of cryptic species within D. angusticeps has been suggested. The striking coloration of the three green species, a trait unique among elapids, suggests their monophyly to the exclusion of D. polylepis. We generated a dated, multilocus phylogeny of the mambas and assessed species boundaries. Species distribution modelling (SDM) was used to assess the past and present potential connectivity between allopatric populations of D. angusticeps and D. polylepis. The phylogeny suggests that diversification of the crown clade began c. 6 Mya and, contrary to previous suggestions, we found no convincing signal of species-level diversification within D. polylepis or D. angusticeps. The hypothesis of green mamba monophyly was rejected, with D. angusticeps being sister to D. polylepis. The SDMs suggested that allopatric populations of D. polylepis and D. angusticeps were historically connected, and that their vicariance is recent.","PeriodicalId":49333,"journal":{"name":"Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaf062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The African mambas (Dendroaspis) comprise an iconic genus of four large-bodied, highly venomous elapid snakes: the black mamba (D. polylepis) from open formations across sub-Saharan Africa is comprised of two allopatric populations, and three species of green mamba (D. angusticeps, D. jamesoni, and D. viridis) from tropical and sub-tropical forests. Dendroaspis angusticeps occurs in multiple isolated forest patches, and the presence of cryptic species within D. angusticeps has been suggested. The striking coloration of the three green species, a trait unique among elapids, suggests their monophyly to the exclusion of D. polylepis. We generated a dated, multilocus phylogeny of the mambas and assessed species boundaries. Species distribution modelling (SDM) was used to assess the past and present potential connectivity between allopatric populations of D. angusticeps and D. polylepis. The phylogeny suggests that diversification of the crown clade began c. 6 Mya and, contrary to previous suggestions, we found no convincing signal of species-level diversification within D. polylepis or D. angusticeps. The hypothesis of green mamba monophyly was rejected, with D. angusticeps being sister to D. polylepis. The SDMs suggested that allopatric populations of D. polylepis and D. angusticeps were historically connected, and that their vicariance is recent.
期刊介绍:
The Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society publishes papers on systematic and evolutionary zoology and comparative, functional and other studies where relevant to these areas. Studies of extinct as well as living animals are included. Reviews are also published; these may be invited by the Editorial Board, but uninvited reviews may also be considered. The Zoological Journal also has a wide circulation amongst zoologists and although narrowly specialized papers are not excluded, potential authors should bear that readership in mind.