Monotonic/cyclic behavior of postfire RC beam-column joints without/with CFRP retrofitting: Experiments

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Vui Van Cao, Det Van Doan, Luan Hoai Dinh, Huy Ba Vo
{"title":"Monotonic/cyclic behavior of postfire RC beam-column joints without/with CFRP retrofitting: Experiments","authors":"Vui Van Cao, Det Van Doan, Luan Hoai Dinh, Huy Ba Vo","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, one control, four 45-min, and four 75-min fire-exposed reinforced concrete (RC) joints without/with CFRP retrofitting were tested under monotonic/cyclic loadings. In each of the four postfire joints, two joints were not retrofitted, and two joints were retrofitted with CFRP. The results showed that, under monotonic loading, the control joint formed a plastic hinge <ce:italic>l</ce:italic><ce:inf loc=\"post\"><ce:italic>p</ce:italic></ce:inf> = <ce:italic>h/2</ce:italic> from the column surface. Fires elongated the plastic hinge length to <ce:italic>l</ce:italic><ce:inf loc=\"post\"><ce:italic>p</ce:italic></ce:inf> = <ce:italic>h</ce:italic>. Cyclic loading formed a thorough crack running from one side to the other side at the beam end. CFRP retrofitting further concentrated a main crack on the beam-end section and developed toward the joint center. The combination of fire, CFRP retrofitting, and cyclic loading further shifted the damage and cracks to the joint center and prevented the damage in the retrofitted regions of beams and columns. The performance and mechanical properties of postfire RC joints were affected detrimentally by fire and/or cyclic loading, and beneficially by CFRP retrofitting. Compared with the control joint, fire decreased the stiffness of postfire RC joints by 14.2%−25.5%, ultimate load by about 11%, while it marginally reduced the yield load. The combination of fire and cyclic loading decreased the stiffness of postfire RC joints by 12.8%−27.0%, ultimate load by 21%, ductility by 82.2% (to low ductile behavior), and yield load by 4.6%−9.1%. CFRP retrofitting almost recovered the stiffness and improved the ultimate load by 15% and yield load by 0.1%−9.7% of postfire RC joints compared with the control joint. It improved the ductility to ‘highly ductile’. Cyclic loading caused a significant degradation in secant stiffness at an average value of 4.0%/cycle. It also caused minor strength degradation for small-amplitude cycles, significant strength degradation for cycles larger than critical cycles. Un-retrofitted and retrofitted joints under cyclic loading had an average pinching index of 0.75, showing a significantly high level of pinching.","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, one control, four 45-min, and four 75-min fire-exposed reinforced concrete (RC) joints without/with CFRP retrofitting were tested under monotonic/cyclic loadings. In each of the four postfire joints, two joints were not retrofitted, and two joints were retrofitted with CFRP. The results showed that, under monotonic loading, the control joint formed a plastic hinge lp = h/2 from the column surface. Fires elongated the plastic hinge length to lp = h. Cyclic loading formed a thorough crack running from one side to the other side at the beam end. CFRP retrofitting further concentrated a main crack on the beam-end section and developed toward the joint center. The combination of fire, CFRP retrofitting, and cyclic loading further shifted the damage and cracks to the joint center and prevented the damage in the retrofitted regions of beams and columns. The performance and mechanical properties of postfire RC joints were affected detrimentally by fire and/or cyclic loading, and beneficially by CFRP retrofitting. Compared with the control joint, fire decreased the stiffness of postfire RC joints by 14.2%−25.5%, ultimate load by about 11%, while it marginally reduced the yield load. The combination of fire and cyclic loading decreased the stiffness of postfire RC joints by 12.8%−27.0%, ultimate load by 21%, ductility by 82.2% (to low ductile behavior), and yield load by 4.6%−9.1%. CFRP retrofitting almost recovered the stiffness and improved the ultimate load by 15% and yield load by 0.1%−9.7% of postfire RC joints compared with the control joint. It improved the ductility to ‘highly ductile’. Cyclic loading caused a significant degradation in secant stiffness at an average value of 4.0%/cycle. It also caused minor strength degradation for small-amplitude cycles, significant strength degradation for cycles larger than critical cycles. Un-retrofitted and retrofitted joints under cyclic loading had an average pinching index of 0.75, showing a significantly high level of pinching.
无/加CFRP加固的RC梁柱节点火灾后的单调/循环性能:试验
在这项研究中,在单调/循环荷载下测试了一个对照,四个45分钟和四个75分钟的未/有CFRP加固的火灾暴露钢筋混凝土(RC)节点。在4个火灾后节点中,每个节点有2个节点未进行改造,2个节点采用CFRP进行改造。结果表明:单调荷载作用下,控制节点与柱表面形成塑性铰lp = h/2;火灾将塑性铰长度拉长至lp = h。循环荷载在梁端形成了从一侧到另一侧的彻底裂缝。CFRP加固使主裂缝在梁端段进一步集中,并向节点中心方向发展。火灾、CFRP加固和循环荷载的联合作用进一步将损伤和裂缝转移到节点中心,阻止了梁柱加固区域的损伤。火灾和/或循环荷载对火灾后RC节点的性能和力学性能产生不利影响,而CFRP加固对其性能和力学性能产生有利影响。与对照节点相比,火灾使火后RC节点刚度降低14.2% ~ 25.5%,极限荷载降低约11%,而屈服荷载略有降低。火灾和循环荷载的组合使火灾后RC节点的刚度降低了12.8% ~ 27.0%,极限荷载降低了21%,延性降低了82.2%(低延性行为),屈服荷载降低了4.6% ~ 9.1%。与对照节点相比,CFRP加固几乎恢复了火灾后RC节点的刚度,并将极限荷载提高了15%,屈服荷载提高了0.1% ~ 9.7%。它将延展性提高到“高延展性”。循环加载导致割线刚度显著下降,平均为4.0%/循环。对于小振幅循环,它也会引起轻微的强度退化,而对于大于临界周期的循环,它会引起显著的强度退化。在循环荷载作用下,未改造和改造后的关节平均捏捏指数为0.75,显示出明显的高捏捏水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信