Hein Rune Skjoldal, Elena Eriksen, Harald Gjøsæter, Vidar Lien, Øystein Skagseth, Jarle Berntsen
{"title":"Spatial Distribution of Numerical Density of Pelagic Juveniles (0‐Group) of Broadcast Spawning Fish Stocks Follows a Common Statistical Pattern","authors":"Hein Rune Skjoldal, Elena Eriksen, Harald Gjøsæter, Vidar Lien, Øystein Skagseth, Jarle Berntsen","doi":"10.1111/faf.12908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistical distributions of spatial abundance data of animal populations can be informative about underlying processes and mechanisms that govern the spatial distributions. Here, we examine a large data set from annual 0‐group fish surveys in the Barents Sea (1980–2017) collected with standardised trawl sampling from a regular grid with 30–35 nautical miles between stations. The primary data are expressed as swept‐area density of 0‐group individuals for six fish species. The annual data series are highly right‐skewed with a tail of high values on a linear scale but are close to lognormal with log‐transformed data. The 0‐group density spans typically 4–5 orders of magnitude for the annual series. When stations are ranked in order from highest to lowest density, they show a common pattern for the six species across the annual series. With log‐transformed data, this pattern is a near log‐linear relationship but with an upswing in the high‐density end revealing higher variability for the top stations. The cumulative version with linear‐scale data is approximated by a simple asymptotic model. Between 14 and 42% of the total number of sampled individuals of a year‐class were on average contained in the highest ranked station for the six species, while 50% of the sampled individuals were found in the first 2–7 highest ranked stations. The common and consistent pattern of the ranked distributions is interpreted to reflect the opposing forces of physical dispersion, on the one hand and aggregation by swimming and schooling, on the other.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12908","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statistical distributions of spatial abundance data of animal populations can be informative about underlying processes and mechanisms that govern the spatial distributions. Here, we examine a large data set from annual 0‐group fish surveys in the Barents Sea (1980–2017) collected with standardised trawl sampling from a regular grid with 30–35 nautical miles between stations. The primary data are expressed as swept‐area density of 0‐group individuals for six fish species. The annual data series are highly right‐skewed with a tail of high values on a linear scale but are close to lognormal with log‐transformed data. The 0‐group density spans typically 4–5 orders of magnitude for the annual series. When stations are ranked in order from highest to lowest density, they show a common pattern for the six species across the annual series. With log‐transformed data, this pattern is a near log‐linear relationship but with an upswing in the high‐density end revealing higher variability for the top stations. The cumulative version with linear‐scale data is approximated by a simple asymptotic model. Between 14 and 42% of the total number of sampled individuals of a year‐class were on average contained in the highest ranked station for the six species, while 50% of the sampled individuals were found in the first 2–7 highest ranked stations. The common and consistent pattern of the ranked distributions is interpreted to reflect the opposing forces of physical dispersion, on the one hand and aggregation by swimming and schooling, on the other.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.