Eena S Lin, Alexandra Seabury, Mohammadsadegh Mikaeili, Joshua Bosire, Anthony Mazzarelli, Michael B Roberts, Stephen Trzeciak, Brian W Roberts, Rafat Ahmed
{"title":"Validation of a 5-item tool to measure parent assessment of clinician compassion during pediatric visits.","authors":"Eena S Lin, Alexandra Seabury, Mohammadsadegh Mikaeili, Joshua Bosire, Anthony Mazzarelli, Michael B Roberts, Stephen Trzeciak, Brian W Roberts, Rafat Ahmed","doi":"10.1177/10815589251359684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our objective was to validate a 5-item compassion measurement tool as a reliable measure of patient assessments of clinician compassion in the pediatric outpatient setting. We completed a cross-sectional study in a U.S. academic healthcare system consisting of six pediatric clinics between February and September 2023. We adapted the original 5-item tool to elicit responses regarding the pediatric patient. The measure was disseminated with the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (CG-CAHPS) survey. We included patients aged <18 years old who had an outpatient clinic visit and had a parent complete the CG-CAHPS survey. Validity testing of the 5-item tool was performed using confirmatory factor analysis. Internal reliability was tested using Cronbach's α, and convergent validity with overall provider rating questions from the CG-CAHPS survey was evaluated using Spearman correlation. We analyzed 640 responses. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 8 (3-13) years, and 47% of patients were female. Sixty-one percent of patients were White/Caucasian and 25% were Black/African American. Confirmatory factor analyses found a good fit. The compassion measure demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.97) and convergent validity with overall provider rating (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.70)) but reflected a patient experience domain distinctly different from what is currently captured in CG-CAHPS surveys. Our results suggest that the 5-item compassion measure is a valid tool that can reliably and distinctly measure patient assessments of clinician compassion in the pediatric outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":520677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","volume":" ","pages":"10815589251359684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589251359684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our objective was to validate a 5-item compassion measurement tool as a reliable measure of patient assessments of clinician compassion in the pediatric outpatient setting. We completed a cross-sectional study in a U.S. academic healthcare system consisting of six pediatric clinics between February and September 2023. We adapted the original 5-item tool to elicit responses regarding the pediatric patient. The measure was disseminated with the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (CG-CAHPS) survey. We included patients aged <18 years old who had an outpatient clinic visit and had a parent complete the CG-CAHPS survey. Validity testing of the 5-item tool was performed using confirmatory factor analysis. Internal reliability was tested using Cronbach's α, and convergent validity with overall provider rating questions from the CG-CAHPS survey was evaluated using Spearman correlation. We analyzed 640 responses. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 8 (3-13) years, and 47% of patients were female. Sixty-one percent of patients were White/Caucasian and 25% were Black/African American. Confirmatory factor analyses found a good fit. The compassion measure demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.97) and convergent validity with overall provider rating (rs = 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.70)) but reflected a patient experience domain distinctly different from what is currently captured in CG-CAHPS surveys. Our results suggest that the 5-item compassion measure is a valid tool that can reliably and distinctly measure patient assessments of clinician compassion in the pediatric outpatient setting.
我们的目的是验证一个5项同情心测量工具作为一个可靠的衡量在儿科门诊设置临床医生的同情心的病人评估。我们在2023年2月至9月期间完成了一项由6个儿科诊所组成的美国学术医疗保健系统的横断面研究。我们调整了原来的5项工具来引出关于儿科患者的回答。该措施与临床医生和医疗保健提供者和系统的群体消费者评估(CG-CAHPS)调查一起传播。我们纳入了年龄小于18岁的门诊就诊患者,他们的父母完成了CG-CAHPS调查。采用验证性因子分析对五项工具进行效度检验。内部信度采用Cronbach's alpha检验,CG-CAHPS调查中总体满意度问题的收敛效度采用Spearman相关评价。我们分析了640份回复。患者年龄中位数(四分位数间距)为8(3-13)岁,47%的患者为女性。61%的患者为白人/高加索人,25%为黑人/非裔美国人。验证性因素分析发现了很好的契合度。同情心测量显示出良好的内部一致性(alpha=0.97)和总体满意度的收敛效度[rs=0.63 (95% CI 0.56-0.70)],但反映的患者体验领域与目前CG-CAHPS调查中捕获的截然不同。我们的研究结果表明,五项同情心量表是一种有效的工具,可以可靠而清晰地衡量儿科门诊患者对临床医生同情心的评估。