A comparative study of machine learning models predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure: enhancing risk estimation in over 25,000 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patients.

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gautham Nair, Ali Hadi, Kartik Gupta, Edward Tran, Geerthan Srikantharajah, Evelyn Waugh, Ephraim Tang, Anton Skaro, Juan Glinka
{"title":"A comparative study of machine learning models predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure: enhancing risk estimation in over 25,000 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patients.","authors":"Gautham Nair, Ali Hadi, Kartik Gupta, Edward Tran, Geerthan Srikantharajah, Evelyn Waugh, Ephraim Tang, Anton Skaro, Juan Glinka","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.25-046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a significant complication with an incidence rate between 8% and 12%. Machine learning (ML) can analyze large datasets to uncover patterns not apparent through traditional methods, enhancing PHLF prediction and potentially mitigate complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, patients who underwent hepatectomy were randomized into training and testing sets. ML algorithms, including LightGBM, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Deep Neural Networks, were evaluated against logistic regression. Performance metrics included receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) and Brier score loss. Shapley Additive exPlanations was used to identify individual variable relevance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28,192 patients from 2013 to 2021 who underwent hepatectomy were included; PHLF occurred in 1,305 patients (4.6%). Preoperative and intraoperative factors most contributed to PHLF. Preoperative factors were international normalized ratio > 1.0, sodium < 139 mEq/L, albumin < 3.9 g/dL, American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, total bilirubin > 0.65 mg/dL. Intraoperative risks include transfusion requirements, trisectionectomy, operative time > 266.5 minutes, open surgical approach. The LightGBM model performed best with an ROC AUC of 0.8349 and a Brier Score loss of 0.0834.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While topical, the role of ML models in surgical risk stratification is evolving. This paper shows the potential of ML algorithms in identifying important subclinical changes that could affect surgical outcomes. Thresholds explored should not be taken as clinical cutoffs but as a proof of concept of how ML models could provide clinicians more information. Such integration could lead to improved clinical outcomes and efficiency in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.25-046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a significant complication with an incidence rate between 8% and 12%. Machine learning (ML) can analyze large datasets to uncover patterns not apparent through traditional methods, enhancing PHLF prediction and potentially mitigate complications.

Methods: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, patients who underwent hepatectomy were randomized into training and testing sets. ML algorithms, including LightGBM, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Deep Neural Networks, were evaluated against logistic regression. Performance metrics included receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) and Brier score loss. Shapley Additive exPlanations was used to identify individual variable relevance.

Results: 28,192 patients from 2013 to 2021 who underwent hepatectomy were included; PHLF occurred in 1,305 patients (4.6%). Preoperative and intraoperative factors most contributed to PHLF. Preoperative factors were international normalized ratio > 1.0, sodium < 139 mEq/L, albumin < 3.9 g/dL, American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, total bilirubin > 0.65 mg/dL. Intraoperative risks include transfusion requirements, trisectionectomy, operative time > 266.5 minutes, open surgical approach. The LightGBM model performed best with an ROC AUC of 0.8349 and a Brier Score loss of 0.0834.

Conclusions: While topical, the role of ML models in surgical risk stratification is evolving. This paper shows the potential of ML algorithms in identifying important subclinical changes that could affect surgical outcomes. Thresholds explored should not be taken as clinical cutoffs but as a proof of concept of how ML models could provide clinicians more information. Such integration could lead to improved clinical outcomes and efficiency in patient care.

预测肝切除术后肝衰竭的机器学习模型的比较研究:增强25000多名国家手术质量改进计划患者的风险评估。
背景/目的:肝切除术后肝功能衰竭(PHLF)是一种重要的并发症,发生率在8% - 12%之间。机器学习(ML)可以分析大型数据集,发现传统方法无法发现的模式,增强PHLF预测,并可能减轻并发症。方法:使用国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库,将肝切除术患者随机分为训练组和测试组。ML算法,包括LightGBM, Random Forest, XGBoost和Deep Neural Networks,根据逻辑回归进行评估。性能指标包括受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC AUC)和Brier评分损失。沙普利加性解释用于确定个体变量的相关性。结果:纳入2013年至2021年接受肝切除术的28,192例患者;PHLF发生1305例(4.6%)。术前和术中因素是导致PHLF的主要原因。术前因素:国际标准化比值>.0,钠< 139 mEq/L,白蛋白< 3.9 g/dL,美国麻醉医师学会评分> 2,总胆红素> 0.65 mg/dL。术中风险包括输血要求、三节切除、手术时间bbb10266.5分钟、开放手术入路。LightGBM模型表现最佳,ROC AUC为0.8349,Brier Score损失为0.0834。结论:虽然是局部的,但ML模型在手术风险分层中的作用正在发展。本文展示了ML算法在识别可能影响手术结果的重要亚临床变化方面的潜力。探索的阈值不应被视为临床截止值,而应被视为ML模型如何为临床医生提供更多信息的概念证明。这种整合可以改善临床结果和患者护理效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信