Yun-Ru Lai MD , Yi-Hsueh Liao MD , Li Huang MD , Huynh Ba Phuong Linh MD, PhD , Fasty Arum Utami MS , Michele Miraglia Del Giudice MD , Giorgio Ciprandi MD , Yang-Ching Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"Clinical Effects of Polyphenolic Compounds on Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Yun-Ru Lai MD , Yi-Hsueh Liao MD , Li Huang MD , Huynh Ba Phuong Linh MD, PhD , Fasty Arum Utami MS , Michele Miraglia Del Giudice MD , Giorgio Ciprandi MD , Yang-Ching Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.06.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Polyphenolic compounds (eg, catechins or quercetin) may reduce hypersensitivity and allergic symptoms, but clinical evidence remains inconsistent.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the therapeutic potential of polyphenolic compounds for managing allergic rhinitis (AR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the effects of polyphenolic compounds on AR symptoms and quality of life (QoL).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirteen RCTs (823 participants) were included: 7 enrolling patients with seasonal AR and 6 with perennial AR. In seasonal AR, polyphenolic compounds significantly reduced total nasal symptom scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.75, <em>P</em> = .0001; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 52.8%), sneezing (SMD = 0.58, <em>P</em> = .0042; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 45.6%), and nasal itching (SMD = 0.54, <em>P</em> = .011; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 41.7%). In perennial AR, total nasal symptom scores improved, whereas individual symptoms were inconclusive. The combined analysis of seasonal and perennial AR, along with a sensitivity analysis excluding 2 outlier trials, yielded a more conservative and robust estimate, showing reductions in total nasal symptom scores (SMD = 0.73, <em>P</em> < .0001; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 38.1%), nasal obstruction (SMD = 0.50, <em>P</em> = .0003; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 36.4%), and sneezing (SMD = 0.57, <em>P</em> < .0001; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 25.7%). Overall certainty of evidence for key nasal symptom outcomes was low to very low due to inconsistency and risk of bias. Effects on QoL were not significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Polyphenolic compounds may serve as a complementary option for alleviating nasal symptoms in patients with AR, but findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future large-scale, rigorous RCTs are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"13 9","pages":"Pages 2475-2491.e16"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219825006130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Polyphenolic compounds (eg, catechins or quercetin) may reduce hypersensitivity and allergic symptoms, but clinical evidence remains inconsistent.
Objective
To evaluate the therapeutic potential of polyphenolic compounds for managing allergic rhinitis (AR).
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the effects of polyphenolic compounds on AR symptoms and quality of life (QoL).
Results
Thirteen RCTs (823 participants) were included: 7 enrolling patients with seasonal AR and 6 with perennial AR. In seasonal AR, polyphenolic compounds significantly reduced total nasal symptom scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.75, P = .0001; I2 = 52.8%), sneezing (SMD = 0.58, P = .0042; I2 = 45.6%), and nasal itching (SMD = 0.54, P = .011; I2 = 41.7%). In perennial AR, total nasal symptom scores improved, whereas individual symptoms were inconclusive. The combined analysis of seasonal and perennial AR, along with a sensitivity analysis excluding 2 outlier trials, yielded a more conservative and robust estimate, showing reductions in total nasal symptom scores (SMD = 0.73, P < .0001; I2 = 38.1%), nasal obstruction (SMD = 0.50, P = .0003; I2 = 36.4%), and sneezing (SMD = 0.57, P < .0001; I2 = 25.7%). Overall certainty of evidence for key nasal symptom outcomes was low to very low due to inconsistency and risk of bias. Effects on QoL were not significant.
Conclusion
Polyphenolic compounds may serve as a complementary option for alleviating nasal symptoms in patients with AR, but findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future large-scale, rigorous RCTs are needed.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.