Prospective comparative study between extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound-guided ozone (O2-O3) injection in patients with plantar fasciitis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Ömer Kuzu, Merve Çakır, Berke Aras, Ayşe Merve Ata, Bilge Kesikburun
{"title":"Prospective comparative study between extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound-guided ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) injection in patients with plantar fasciitis.","authors":"Ömer Kuzu, Merve Çakır, Berke Aras, Ayşe Merve Ata, Bilge Kesikburun","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and local ozone (O<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) injection in patients with plantar fasciitis. This prospective study included 47 patients who were scheduled for ESWT or local ozone (O<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) injection with the diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. ESWT group (n = 23) received 2000 radial shock waves (session of 2.8 Bars with a frequency of 12 Hz). Local ozone (O<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) injection group (n = 24) underwent an ultrasound-guided injection of 5 cc ozone (O<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) gas with a 10 μg/mL. ESWT and local ozone (O<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) injection were applied once a week for three sessions. The outcome measures were assessed prior to treatment, after the last intervention, and 3rd month follow-up; morning and overall pain via Visual Analog Scale (VAS), foot functions via Foot Function Index (FFI), and plantar fascia thickness via ultrasound. In both ESWT and ozone groups, there were statistically significant improvements in morning VAS, overall VAS, FFI, and plantar fascia thickness scores post-treatment and at 3rd month follow-up compared to pre-treatment (p ˂ 0.017). There was no significant difference between ESWT and ozone groups on changes of morning VAS, overall VAS, FFI, and plantar fascia thickness scores at post-treatment and at 3rd month follow-up compared to pre-treatment (p > 0.05). In the present study, it was observed that both ultrasound-guided local ozone (O<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) injections and ESWT were effective in reducing pain, improving functionality, and reducing plantar fascia thickness in patients with plantar fasciitis but they were not superior to each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.05.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and local ozone (O2O3) injection in patients with plantar fasciitis. This prospective study included 47 patients who were scheduled for ESWT or local ozone (O2O3) injection with the diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. ESWT group (n = 23) received 2000 radial shock waves (session of 2.8 Bars with a frequency of 12 Hz). Local ozone (O2O3) injection group (n = 24) underwent an ultrasound-guided injection of 5 cc ozone (O2O3) gas with a 10 μg/mL. ESWT and local ozone (O2O3) injection were applied once a week for three sessions. The outcome measures were assessed prior to treatment, after the last intervention, and 3rd month follow-up; morning and overall pain via Visual Analog Scale (VAS), foot functions via Foot Function Index (FFI), and plantar fascia thickness via ultrasound. In both ESWT and ozone groups, there were statistically significant improvements in morning VAS, overall VAS, FFI, and plantar fascia thickness scores post-treatment and at 3rd month follow-up compared to pre-treatment (p ˂ 0.017). There was no significant difference between ESWT and ozone groups on changes of morning VAS, overall VAS, FFI, and plantar fascia thickness scores at post-treatment and at 3rd month follow-up compared to pre-treatment (p > 0.05). In the present study, it was observed that both ultrasound-guided local ozone (O2O3) injections and ESWT were effective in reducing pain, improving functionality, and reducing plantar fascia thickness in patients with plantar fasciitis but they were not superior to each other.

体外冲击波治疗与超声引导臭氧(O2-O3)注射治疗足底筋膜炎的前瞻性比较研究。
本研究的目的是比较体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)和局部臭氧(O2-O3)注射对足底筋膜炎患者的疗效。这项前瞻性研究包括47例诊断为足底筋膜炎的患者,他们计划进行ESWT或局部臭氧(O2-O3)注射。ESWT组(n=23)接受2000次径向激波(2.8 bar,频率为12 Hz)。局部臭氧(O2-O3)注射组24例,超声引导下注射浓度为10 μg/mL的臭氧(O2-O3)气体5 cc。ESWT和局部臭氧(O2-O3)注射每周1次,共3次。在治疗前、最后一次干预后和第3个月随访时评估结果指标;通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量晨痛和全身疼痛,通过足功能指数(FFI)测量足部功能,通过超声测量足底筋膜厚度。在ESWT组和臭氧组中,与治疗前相比,治疗后和随访第3个月时晨间VAS、总VAS、FFI和足底筋膜厚度评分均有统计学意义上的改善(p小于0.017)。ESWT组与臭氧组治疗后及随访第3个月时晨间VAS、总VAS、FFI、足底筋膜厚度评分变化与治疗前比较,差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。本研究观察到超声引导下局部臭氧(O2-O3)注射与ESWT均能有效减轻足底筋膜炎患者的疼痛、改善功能、减轻足底筋膜厚度,但两者并不具有优势。证据水平:ii。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信