Evaluation of Brain Abscess Prognostic Factors and Role of Surgical Intervention Within a Single Health System.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jamie E Cronin, Timothy H Ung, Amanda L Piquet, Kelli M Money
{"title":"Evaluation of Brain Abscess Prognostic Factors and Role of Surgical Intervention Within a Single Health System.","authors":"Jamie E Cronin, Timothy H Ung, Amanda L Piquet, Kelli M Money","doi":"10.1177/19418744251353544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluate patient, clinical, and treatment variables impacting mortality in patients with brain abscesses.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain abscesses are intraparenchymal infectious foci with significant morbidity and mortality. Management includes antimicrobial therapy +/- surgical intervention, and is dependent on suspected pathogen/source, patient factors, and clinician judgement. Treatment type and duration vary substantially and are often guided by imaging, inflammatory markers, and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>186 patients with brain abscesses admitted at a single health system between 2010 and 2022 were analyzed. Patient demographics, clinical course, diagnostic studies, and abscess treatment were assessed for impact on mortality during admission via univariate and stepwise multivariate nominal logistic regression. Secondary outcomes of surgical drainage were evaluated with univariate and multivariate nominal logistic regression, and survival over time of those who received surgical drainage vs those who did not was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>10.7% of patients died during initial admission. Intravenous drug use, deep-seated abscess location, and surgical complication were independently predictive of death during admission. Patients without surgical intervention demonstrated increased likelihood of mortality over time but not during admission. Independent predictors of surgical intervention include lack of ventriculitis, larger abscess diameter, non-hematogenous or -pulmonary source, and mass effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest surgical intervention is generally avoided when infection is systemic, severe, or with intraventricular abscess rupture. Patients with overt symptoms of brain infection were more likely to receive prompt surgical drainage. In our patient population, surgical drainage in addition to antimicrobial therapy did not independently impact inpatient mortality although did impact overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":" ","pages":"19418744251353544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744251353544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate patient, clinical, and treatment variables impacting mortality in patients with brain abscesses.

Background: Brain abscesses are intraparenchymal infectious foci with significant morbidity and mortality. Management includes antimicrobial therapy +/- surgical intervention, and is dependent on suspected pathogen/source, patient factors, and clinician judgement. Treatment type and duration vary substantially and are often guided by imaging, inflammatory markers, and symptoms.

Methods: 186 patients with brain abscesses admitted at a single health system between 2010 and 2022 were analyzed. Patient demographics, clinical course, diagnostic studies, and abscess treatment were assessed for impact on mortality during admission via univariate and stepwise multivariate nominal logistic regression. Secondary outcomes of surgical drainage were evaluated with univariate and multivariate nominal logistic regression, and survival over time of those who received surgical drainage vs those who did not was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results: 10.7% of patients died during initial admission. Intravenous drug use, deep-seated abscess location, and surgical complication were independently predictive of death during admission. Patients without surgical intervention demonstrated increased likelihood of mortality over time but not during admission. Independent predictors of surgical intervention include lack of ventriculitis, larger abscess diameter, non-hematogenous or -pulmonary source, and mass effect.

Conclusions: These findings suggest surgical intervention is generally avoided when infection is systemic, severe, or with intraventricular abscess rupture. Patients with overt symptoms of brain infection were more likely to receive prompt surgical drainage. In our patient population, surgical drainage in addition to antimicrobial therapy did not independently impact inpatient mortality although did impact overall survival.

单一医疗系统内脑脓肿预后因素及手术干预作用的评估。
目的:评估影响脑脓肿患者死亡率的患者、临床和治疗变量。背景:脑脓肿是肺实质内的感染性病灶,发病率和死亡率都很高。管理包括抗菌药物治疗+/-手术干预,并取决于疑似病原体/来源,患者因素和临床医生的判断。治疗类型和持续时间差别很大,通常以影像学、炎症标志物和症状为指导。方法:对2010年至2022年同一卫生系统收治的186例脑脓肿患者进行分析。通过单变量和逐步多变量名义逻辑回归,评估患者人口统计学、临床病程、诊断研究和脓肿治疗对入院期间死亡率的影响。采用单变量和多变量名义逻辑回归评估手术引流的次要结局,采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估接受手术引流与未接受手术引流的患者随时间的生存率。结果:10.7%的患者在初次入院时死亡。静脉用药、深部脓肿位置和手术并发症是入院期间死亡的独立预测因素。未经手术干预的患者随着时间的推移显示出死亡率增加的可能性,但在入院期间没有。手术干预的独立预测因素包括没有脑室炎、较大脓肿直径、非血源性或肺源性以及肿块效应。结论:这些发现表明,当感染是全身性的、严重的或脑室内脓肿破裂时,一般避免手术干预。有明显脑感染症状的患者更有可能接受及时的手术引流。在我们的患者群体中,除抗菌治疗外的手术引流不会单独影响住院患者死亡率,尽管会影响总体生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信