Adaptation and validation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire for Dutch pre-vocational students.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bernard Brouwer, Matthijs J Warrens, Hanke Korpershoek
{"title":"Adaptation and validation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire for Dutch pre-vocational students.","authors":"Bernard Brouwer, Matthijs J Warrens, Hanke Korpershoek","doi":"10.1186/s40461-025-00188-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To study self-regulated learning in pre-vocational education, researchers need instruments that have high reliability and validity. This study investigated, for the first time, the factorial validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for students in pre-vocational education in the Netherlands. The MSLQ was administered to 594 Dutch pre-vocational students. Reliability analyses of the MSLQ sections and subscales were conducted. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factor structures of the MSLQ sections, scales and subscales. High reliability was found for both sections of the MSLQ, i.e., the sections Motivation and Learning Strategies, but varying levels of reliability were obtained for the fifteen MSLQ subscales. With regard to factorial validity, a moderate to good model fit for most subscales was found. For some subscales, certain modifications were required to obtain a good model fit. Each of the modifications made could be justified substantially. Furthermore, for two subscales the factor model was exactly identified and factor validity could not be studied. For most MSLQ subscales, evidence was found that the constructs measured with these subscales can be assessed quite well among Dutch pre-vocational students. However, scores based on the complete MSLQ or the two sections should not be used.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40461-025-00188-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":38550,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training","volume":"17 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-025-00188-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To study self-regulated learning in pre-vocational education, researchers need instruments that have high reliability and validity. This study investigated, for the first time, the factorial validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for students in pre-vocational education in the Netherlands. The MSLQ was administered to 594 Dutch pre-vocational students. Reliability analyses of the MSLQ sections and subscales were conducted. Furthermore, confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factor structures of the MSLQ sections, scales and subscales. High reliability was found for both sections of the MSLQ, i.e., the sections Motivation and Learning Strategies, but varying levels of reliability were obtained for the fifteen MSLQ subscales. With regard to factorial validity, a moderate to good model fit for most subscales was found. For some subscales, certain modifications were required to obtain a good model fit. Each of the modifications made could be justified substantially. Furthermore, for two subscales the factor model was exactly identified and factor validity could not be studied. For most MSLQ subscales, evidence was found that the constructs measured with these subscales can be assessed quite well among Dutch pre-vocational students. However, scores based on the complete MSLQ or the two sections should not be used.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40461-025-00188-2.

荷兰职前学生学习问卷动机策略的调整与验证。
为了研究职前教育中的自我调节学习,研究者需要具有高信度和效度的工具。本研究首次对荷兰职业教育学生学习动机策略问卷(MSLQ)的因子效度和信度进行了调查。对594名荷兰职前学生进行了MSLQ测试。对MSLQ各部分和子量表进行了信度分析。此外,采用验证性因子分析对MSLQ各部分、量表和子量表的因子结构进行检验。MSLQ的两个部分,即动机和学习策略部分,都有很高的信度,但15个MSLQ分量表的信度不同。关于因子效度,一个中等到良好的模型适合大多数子量表被发现。对于某些子量表,需要进行某些修改以获得良好的模型拟合。所作的每一项修改都有充分的理由。此外,两个子量表的因子模型识别不准确,无法研究因子效度。对于大多数MSLQ子量表,有证据表明,用这些子量表测量的构念可以很好地评估荷兰职业前学生。但是,基于完整的MSLQ或两个部分的分数不应该被使用。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1186/s40461-025-00188-2获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
9
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of this journal is to provide a platform for original empirical investigations in the field of professional, vocational and technical education, comparing the effectiveness, efficiency and equity of different vocational education systems at the school, company and systemic level. The journal fills a gap in the existing literature focusing on empirically-oriented academic research and stimulating the interest in strengthening the vocational part of the educational system, both at the basic and higher education level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信