{"title":"What is the Role of Caffeine in the Management of Preterm Infants?","authors":"David M Rub, Eric C Eichenwald","doi":"10.1007/s40746-025-00329-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To describe how clinical practice around caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity has shifted in response to emerging data, with particular emphasis on changes in initiation timing, dosing strategies, and treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several new studies have begun to explore alternative approaches to caffeine therapy, including trials of caffeine initiation in the delivery room, increased loading and maintenance dosing, and extended use through later postmenstrual ages. Notably, the MOCHA and ICAF trials offer new insights into the potential risks and benefits of prolonging therapy beyond traditional discontinuation thresholds. These studies reflect growing interest in tailoring caffeine treatment to the evolving physiology of preterm infants, though long-term outcomes remain under investigation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Clinical use of caffeine has evolved far beyond the original CAP protocol, driven by physiologic rationale and early trial signals, but often outpaces the strength of the evidence. Future multicenter, randomized trials are essential to confirm safety and efficacy of earlier initiation, higher dosing, and extended duration and to ensure that practice refinements translate into durable improvements in preterm infant outcomes worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":37445,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics","volume":"11 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-025-00329-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: To describe how clinical practice around caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity has shifted in response to emerging data, with particular emphasis on changes in initiation timing, dosing strategies, and treatment duration.
Recent findings: Several new studies have begun to explore alternative approaches to caffeine therapy, including trials of caffeine initiation in the delivery room, increased loading and maintenance dosing, and extended use through later postmenstrual ages. Notably, the MOCHA and ICAF trials offer new insights into the potential risks and benefits of prolonging therapy beyond traditional discontinuation thresholds. These studies reflect growing interest in tailoring caffeine treatment to the evolving physiology of preterm infants, though long-term outcomes remain under investigation.
Summary: Clinical use of caffeine has evolved far beyond the original CAP protocol, driven by physiologic rationale and early trial signals, but often outpaces the strength of the evidence. Future multicenter, randomized trials are essential to confirm safety and efficacy of earlier initiation, higher dosing, and extended duration and to ensure that practice refinements translate into durable improvements in preterm infant outcomes worldwide.
期刊介绍:
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics aims to review the most important, recently published research on treatment in the field of pediatrics. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of children of all ages.We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas covering all the major medical and surgical disciplines in pediatrics. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive treatment-focused review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also occasionally provided.