Preparation of time-lapse culture dishes with refrigerated medium, rather than pre-warmed, may result in better clinical outcomes.

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Zygote Pub Date : 2025-07-07 DOI:10.1017/S0967199425100051
Yasong Geng, Fangfang Dai, Zhiwei Yang, Guozhen Li, Linlin Tao, Haoyang Dai, Shusong Wang, Bo Zheng
{"title":"Preparation of time-lapse culture dishes with refrigerated medium, rather than pre-warmed, may result in better clinical outcomes.","authors":"Yasong Geng, Fangfang Dai, Zhiwei Yang, Guozhen Li, Linlin Tao, Haoyang Dai, Shusong Wang, Bo Zheng","doi":"10.1017/S0967199425100051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of using refrigerated versus pre-warmed media for preparing time-lapse dishes in <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF). Patients undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle were divided into two groups. The control group used pre-warmed culture media, while the experimental group used refrigerated culture media. The osmotic pressure of the culture droplets in both groups was tested. No statistical differences were found between the two groups' basic data. The proportion of air microbubbles affecting imaging significantly decreased (4.55% vs. 37.97%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) when using pre-warmed media. However, the blastocyst formation rate (56.62% vs. 49.70%, <i>P</i> = 0.046) and total high-quality embryo rate (22.26% vs. 17.06%, <i>P</i> = 0.047) were significantly higher in the refrigerated media group compared to the pre-warmed media group. The higher rate of high-quality embryos in the refrigerated media group might result in a higher single embryo transfer rate (45.10% vs. 18.52%, <i>P</i> = 0.020) and implantation rate (58.23% vs. 34.69%, <i>P</i> = 0.010). From day -1 to day 1, osmolality increased, with the P-3.5 group showing a significant elevation compared to the other three groups. After 5 days of incubation, the osmotic pressure of group R-4.0 was significantly lower than that of groups P-3.5, P-4.0 and P-3.5. In conclusion, refrigerated culture media dishes helped stabilize the osmotic pressure of the culture microenvironment and reduce water evaporation. The refrigerated group showed a higher rate of high-quality embryos and live births, although pre-warmed culture media effectively reduced the occurrence of air microbubbles that affect embryo imaging in the next day's dishes.</p>","PeriodicalId":24075,"journal":{"name":"Zygote","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zygote","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199425100051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of using refrigerated versus pre-warmed media for preparing time-lapse dishes in in vitro fertilization (IVF). Patients undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle were divided into two groups. The control group used pre-warmed culture media, while the experimental group used refrigerated culture media. The osmotic pressure of the culture droplets in both groups was tested. No statistical differences were found between the two groups' basic data. The proportion of air microbubbles affecting imaging significantly decreased (4.55% vs. 37.97%, P < 0.001) when using pre-warmed media. However, the blastocyst formation rate (56.62% vs. 49.70%, P = 0.046) and total high-quality embryo rate (22.26% vs. 17.06%, P = 0.047) were significantly higher in the refrigerated media group compared to the pre-warmed media group. The higher rate of high-quality embryos in the refrigerated media group might result in a higher single embryo transfer rate (45.10% vs. 18.52%, P = 0.020) and implantation rate (58.23% vs. 34.69%, P = 0.010). From day -1 to day 1, osmolality increased, with the P-3.5 group showing a significant elevation compared to the other three groups. After 5 days of incubation, the osmotic pressure of group R-4.0 was significantly lower than that of groups P-3.5, P-4.0 and P-3.5. In conclusion, refrigerated culture media dishes helped stabilize the osmotic pressure of the culture microenvironment and reduce water evaporation. The refrigerated group showed a higher rate of high-quality embryos and live births, although pre-warmed culture media effectively reduced the occurrence of air microbubbles that affect embryo imaging in the next day's dishes.

用冷藏培养基而不是预热培养基制备延时培养皿可能会产生更好的临床结果。
本研究旨在比较在体外受精(IVF)中使用冷藏培养基与预热培养基制备延时培养皿的临床结果。接受第一次IVF/ICSI周期的患者分为两组。对照组采用预热培养基,试验组采用冷藏培养基。测定两组培养滴的渗透压。两组基本资料无统计学差异。使用预热介质时,空气微泡影响成像的比例显著降低(4.55% vs. 37.97%, P < 0.001)。但冷藏培养基组囊胚形成率(56.62% vs 49.70%, P = 0.046)和总优质胚率(22.26% vs 17.06%, P = 0.047)显著高于预热培养基组。高质量胚率的冷冻培养基组单胚胎移植率(45.10% vs. 18.52%, P = 0.020)和着床率(58.23% vs. 34.69%, P = 0.010)较高。从第1天到第1天,渗透压升高,与其他三组相比,P-3.5组明显升高。孵育5 d后,R-4.0组的渗透压显著低于P-3.5、P-4.0和P-3.5组。综上所述,冷藏培养皿有助于稳定培养微环境的渗透压,减少水分蒸发。冷藏组显示出更高的高质量胚胎和活产率,尽管预热的培养基有效地减少了影响第二天培养皿中胚胎成像的空气微泡的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zygote
Zygote 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: An international journal dedicated to the rapid publication of original research in early embryology, Zygote covers interdisciplinary studies on gametogenesis through fertilization to gastrulation in animals and humans. The scope has been expanded to include clinical papers, molecular and developmental genetics. The editors will favour work describing fundamental processes in the cellular and molecular mechanisms of animal development, and, in particular, the identification of unifying principles in biology. Nonetheless, new technologies, review articles, debates and letters will become a prominent feature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信