Switching to subcutaneous zilucoplan from intravenous complement component 5 inhibitors in generalised myasthenia gravis: a phase IIIb, open-label study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2025-07-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864251347283
Miriam Freimer, Urvi Desai, Raghav Govindarajan, Min K Kang, Shaida Khan, Bhupendra Khatri, Todd Levine, Samir Macwan, Perry B Shieh, Michael D Weiss, Jos Bloemers, Babak Boroojerdi, Eumorphia Maria Delicha, Andreea Lavrov, Puneet Singh, James F Howard
{"title":"Switching to subcutaneous zilucoplan from intravenous complement component 5 inhibitors in generalised myasthenia gravis: a phase IIIb, open-label study.","authors":"Miriam Freimer, Urvi Desai, Raghav Govindarajan, Min K Kang, Shaida Khan, Bhupendra Khatri, Todd Levine, Samir Macwan, Perry B Shieh, Michael D Weiss, Jos Bloemers, Babak Boroojerdi, Eumorphia Maria Delicha, Andreea Lavrov, Puneet Singh, James F Howard","doi":"10.1177/17562864251347283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zilucoplan, a peptide complement component 5 (C5) inhibitor, is self-administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection, which offers an alternative to intravenous infusion of antibody-based complement C5 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate subcutaneous zilucoplan in adults with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) who switched from intravenous complement C5 inhibitors to zilucoplan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>MG0017 (NCT05514873) was a phase IIIb, open-label, single-arm study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients had clinically stable gMG on an intravenous complement C5 inhibitor and were willing to switch to zilucoplan. Patients received a 12-week treatment period of daily subcutaneous zilucoplan 0.3 mg/kg. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was the primary endpoint. Change from baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score at Week 12 was a secondary endpoint. Treatment preference (Week 12) and treatment satisfaction (9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9)) were both exploratory endpoints. Assessments by prior intravenous complement C5 inhibitor were conducted post hoc.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients enrolled and received zilucoplan; 16 switched from eculizumab and 10 from ravulizumab. TEAEs occurred in 19/26 (73.1%) patients and were mostly mild in severity. At Week 12, least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval) MG-ADL scores improved from baseline by -1.15 (-2.11, -0.19), <i>p</i> = 0.0217 and Quantitative MG (QMG) scores by -1.24 (-2.64, 0.16), <i>p</i> = 0.0802. Clinically meaningful improvement from baseline in mean MG-ADL and QMG scores was observed at Week 12 among patients who switched from ravulizumab (-2.41 (-4.52, -0.30; <i>p</i> = 0.0307) and -3.52 (-6.14, -0.90; <i>p</i> = 0.0149), respectively). At Week 12, 76.9% (<i>n</i> = 20) patients preferred subcutaneous injection compared with intravenous infusion. Mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline in the TSQM-9 Global Satisfaction, Effectiveness and Convenience subscores at Week 12 were +19.410 (27.429), +13.889 (21.534) and +21.739 (19.955), respectively. Complement inhibition increased from baseline and was complete (>95%) by Week 2 and maintained to Week 12.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zilucoplan demonstrated a favourable safety profile. gMG symptoms improved during zilucoplan treatment; this was clinically meaningful for those switching from ravulizumab.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05514873); 22 August 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05514873.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251347283"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251347283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Zilucoplan, a peptide complement component 5 (C5) inhibitor, is self-administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection, which offers an alternative to intravenous infusion of antibody-based complement C5 inhibitors.

Objective: To evaluate subcutaneous zilucoplan in adults with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) who switched from intravenous complement C5 inhibitors to zilucoplan.

Design: MG0017 (NCT05514873) was a phase IIIb, open-label, single-arm study.

Methods: Eligible patients had clinically stable gMG on an intravenous complement C5 inhibitor and were willing to switch to zilucoplan. Patients received a 12-week treatment period of daily subcutaneous zilucoplan 0.3 mg/kg. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was the primary endpoint. Change from baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score at Week 12 was a secondary endpoint. Treatment preference (Week 12) and treatment satisfaction (9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9)) were both exploratory endpoints. Assessments by prior intravenous complement C5 inhibitor were conducted post hoc.

Results: Twenty-six patients enrolled and received zilucoplan; 16 switched from eculizumab and 10 from ravulizumab. TEAEs occurred in 19/26 (73.1%) patients and were mostly mild in severity. At Week 12, least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval) MG-ADL scores improved from baseline by -1.15 (-2.11, -0.19), p = 0.0217 and Quantitative MG (QMG) scores by -1.24 (-2.64, 0.16), p = 0.0802. Clinically meaningful improvement from baseline in mean MG-ADL and QMG scores was observed at Week 12 among patients who switched from ravulizumab (-2.41 (-4.52, -0.30; p = 0.0307) and -3.52 (-6.14, -0.90; p = 0.0149), respectively). At Week 12, 76.9% (n = 20) patients preferred subcutaneous injection compared with intravenous infusion. Mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline in the TSQM-9 Global Satisfaction, Effectiveness and Convenience subscores at Week 12 were +19.410 (27.429), +13.889 (21.534) and +21.739 (19.955), respectively. Complement inhibition increased from baseline and was complete (>95%) by Week 2 and maintained to Week 12.

Conclusion: Zilucoplan demonstrated a favourable safety profile. gMG symptoms improved during zilucoplan treatment; this was clinically meaningful for those switching from ravulizumab.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05514873); 22 August 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05514873.

广泛性重症肌无力患者从静脉补体成分5抑制剂转为皮下zilucoplan:一项IIIb期开放标签研究
背景:Zilucoplan是一种肽补体成分5 (C5)抑制剂,可作为皮下(SC)注射自我给药,这是静脉输注基于抗体的补体C5抑制剂的替代方案。目的:评价乙酰胆碱受体自身抗体阳性的成人全身性重症肌无力(gMG)患者从静脉补体C5抑制剂转为zilucoplan后皮下注射zilucoplan的疗效。设计:MG0017 (NCT05514873)是一项IIIb期、开放标签、单臂研究。方法:符合条件的患者在静脉注射补体C5抑制剂后gMG临床稳定,并愿意改用zilucoplan。疗程为12周,每日皮下注射zilucoplan 0.3 mg/kg。治疗发生不良事件(teae)的发生率是主要终点。第12周重症肌无力日常生活活动(MG-ADL)评分与基线的变化是次要终点。治疗偏好(第12周)和治疗满意度(9项用药治疗满意度问卷(TSQM-9))均为探索性终点。事后进行静脉补体C5抑制剂评估。结果:26例患者入组并接受zilucoplan治疗;16人从eculizumab切换,10人从ravulizumab切换。teae发生在19/26(73.1%)例患者中,大多数严重程度较轻。在第12周,最小二乘(LS)平均值(95%置信区间)MG- adl评分较基线提高了-1.15 (-2.11,-0.19),p = 0.0217,定量MG (QMG)评分提高了-1.24 (-2.64,0.16),p = 0.0802。在第12周,从拉乌利珠单抗(-2.41 (-4.52,-0.30;P = 0.0307)和-3.52 (-6.14,-0.90;P = 0.0149)。在第12周,76.9% (n = 20)的患者更倾向于皮下注射而不是静脉输液。在第12周,TSQM-9整体满意度、有效性和便利性评分与基线的平均(标准差)变化分别为+19.410(27.429)、+13.889(21.534)和+21.739(19.955)。补体抑制从基线开始增加,到第2周完全(>95%),并维持到第12周。结论:Zilucoplan具有良好的安全性。治疗期间gMG症状改善;这对于从ravulizumab切换的患者具有临床意义。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05514873);2022年8月22日。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05514873。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信