Inter-rater Reliability and Accuracy of NBI Score for Activity Evaluation in Ulcerative Colitis.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Gianpiero Stefanelli, Marco Valvano, Annalisa Capannolo, Stefano Necozione, Angelo Viscido, Giovanni Latella, Michele Marchese
{"title":"Inter-rater Reliability and Accuracy of NBI Score for Activity Evaluation in Ulcerative Colitis.","authors":"Gianpiero Stefanelli, Marco Valvano, Annalisa Capannolo, Stefano Necozione, Angelo Viscido, Giovanni Latella, Michele Marchese","doi":"10.2174/0115748871367645250623062144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopy is a critical tool for the management of Ulcerative Colitis (UC). In this study, we aim to explore the accuracy of Virtual Chromoendoscopy (VCE) using Narrow Banding Imaging (NBI), and magnification using Near Focus (NF) for a better definition of endoscopic inflammation grade in UC patients compared to standard white light (WL) endoscopy alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a non-randomized prospective study including all the patients who underwent a colonoscopy (for any reason) between April and September 2023 (with protocol number n. 60/2019.20). During the endoscopic evaluation, at least one image with white light - evaluated using the Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), one image with NBI, one image with NBI plus NF, and a biopsy were obtained in each colonic tract (cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum). All the stored images were evaluated by three endoscopists separately and compared with the results of the histological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 UC patients were included. The inter-rater reliability concerning the different scores used (MES, NBI score, and NBI plus NF score), which was evaluated with Cohen's kappa coefficient, was good for the MES, good to excellent for the NBI score, and good for the NBI plus NF score. The concordance between histological evaluation (using the Nancy Index) and the MES was unsatisfactory for all the endoscopists, while the concordance between the NBI evaluation score and the Nancy Index was good to excellent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results in the present study suggest that the new endoscopic technologies could be useful to better define disease activity in IBD patients driving better therapeutic strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21174,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748871367645250623062144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy is a critical tool for the management of Ulcerative Colitis (UC). In this study, we aim to explore the accuracy of Virtual Chromoendoscopy (VCE) using Narrow Banding Imaging (NBI), and magnification using Near Focus (NF) for a better definition of endoscopic inflammation grade in UC patients compared to standard white light (WL) endoscopy alone.

Methods: This is a non-randomized prospective study including all the patients who underwent a colonoscopy (for any reason) between April and September 2023 (with protocol number n. 60/2019.20). During the endoscopic evaluation, at least one image with white light - evaluated using the Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), one image with NBI, one image with NBI plus NF, and a biopsy were obtained in each colonic tract (cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum). All the stored images were evaluated by three endoscopists separately and compared with the results of the histological evaluation.

Results: A total of 31 UC patients were included. The inter-rater reliability concerning the different scores used (MES, NBI score, and NBI plus NF score), which was evaluated with Cohen's kappa coefficient, was good for the MES, good to excellent for the NBI score, and good for the NBI plus NF score. The concordance between histological evaluation (using the Nancy Index) and the MES was unsatisfactory for all the endoscopists, while the concordance between the NBI evaluation score and the Nancy Index was good to excellent.

Conclusion: The results in the present study suggest that the new endoscopic technologies could be useful to better define disease activity in IBD patients driving better therapeutic strategy.

溃疡性结肠炎患者活动评估NBI评分的可信度和准确性。
背景:结肠镜检查是治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的重要工具。在这项研究中,我们的目的是探索使用窄带成像(NBI)的虚拟彩色内镜(VCE)和使用近焦(NF)放大的准确性,以便与单独的标准白光(WL)内镜相比,更好地定义UC患者的内窥镜炎症等级。方法:这是一项非随机前瞻性研究,包括所有在2023年4月至9月(方案号60/2019.20)接受结肠镜检查的患者(任何原因)。在内镜评估期间,在每个结肠道(盲肠、升结肠、横结肠、降结肠、乙状结肠和直肠)至少获得一张白光图像-使用梅奥内镜评分(MES)进行评估,一张NBI图像,一张NBI + NF图像,并进行活检。所有存储的图像分别由三名内镜医师评估,并与组织学评估结果进行比较。结果:共纳入31例UC患者。使用Cohen's kappa系数评估的不同评分(MES、NBI评分和NBI + NF评分)的评分者间信度,MES为良好,NBI评分为良好至优秀,NBI + NF评分为良好。所有内镜医师的组织学评价(使用Nancy指数)与MES的一致性不理想,而NBI评价评分与Nancy指数的一致性为良好至优秀。结论:本研究的结果表明,新的内镜技术可能有助于更好地确定IBD患者的疾病活动,从而推动更好的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews on recent clinical trials
Reviews on recent clinical trials PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials publishes frontier reviews on recent clinical trials of major importance. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles in the field. Topics covered include: important Phase I – IV clinical trial studies, clinical investigations at all stages of development and therapeutics. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug therapy and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信