A Medium to Long-Term Study Comparing Stress Urinary Incontinence Procedures.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Neurourology and Urodynamics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-07 DOI:10.1002/nau.70101
Ifeoma Offiah, D Carolina Ochoa, Jennifer M Alvarado, Millie Mercer, Chendrimada Madhu, Herney A Garcia-Perdomo, Hashim Hashim
{"title":"A Medium to Long-Term Study Comparing Stress Urinary Incontinence Procedures.","authors":"Ifeoma Offiah, D Carolina Ochoa, Jennifer M Alvarado, Millie Mercer, Chendrimada Madhu, Herney A Garcia-Perdomo, Hashim Hashim","doi":"10.1002/nau.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Concerns remain regarding the safety of the retropubic tape (TVT) procedure. We assess the efficacy, satisfaction and long-term outcomes of the TVT procedure and compare it to the autologous fascial sling (AFS), colposuspension, and urethral bulking procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of prospective data of all patients post stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery in our tertiary center between January 2012 and December 2020 was performed. Patients were invited to complete three validated questionnaires: International Consultation of Incontinence Modular Questionnaire Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS), ICIQ Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS) and ICIQ satisfaction (ICIQ-S). Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate complications. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Eight hundred fifty-three SUI procedures were performed in the study period. The responses from 395 questionnaires were analyzed. Median follow up: 5.9 years (range 1-10.1). The TVT and AFS procedures were the most efficacious procedures: 64% TVT, 62% AFS, 40% Colposuspension, 26% urethral bulking, p < 0.001. The AFS group had the lowest reported rate of complications: 22.6% AFS, 65.7% TVT, 67.1% colposuspension, 71.74% Urethral bulking (p < 0.001). Pain was the most reported complication and the AFS group had the lowest reporting of severe pain: 68% AFS, 74% TVT, 80% Colposuspension, 78% urethral bulking (p = 0.350).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Mesh exposure was not evaluated due to the lack of validated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AFS and TVT procedures are reported as the most successful procedures for the surgical management of SUI. Due to the associated risk of mesh complications, we recommend AFS as the procedure of choice for the surgical management of SUI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"1425-1431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Concerns remain regarding the safety of the retropubic tape (TVT) procedure. We assess the efficacy, satisfaction and long-term outcomes of the TVT procedure and compare it to the autologous fascial sling (AFS), colposuspension, and urethral bulking procedures.

Methods: A review of prospective data of all patients post stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery in our tertiary center between January 2012 and December 2020 was performed. Patients were invited to complete three validated questionnaires: International Consultation of Incontinence Modular Questionnaire Vaginal Symptoms (ICIQ-VS), ICIQ Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS) and ICIQ satisfaction (ICIQ-S). Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate complications. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate satisfaction.

Key findings: Eight hundred fifty-three SUI procedures were performed in the study period. The responses from 395 questionnaires were analyzed. Median follow up: 5.9 years (range 1-10.1). The TVT and AFS procedures were the most efficacious procedures: 64% TVT, 62% AFS, 40% Colposuspension, 26% urethral bulking, p < 0.001. The AFS group had the lowest reported rate of complications: 22.6% AFS, 65.7% TVT, 67.1% colposuspension, 71.74% Urethral bulking (p < 0.001). Pain was the most reported complication and the AFS group had the lowest reporting of severe pain: 68% AFS, 74% TVT, 80% Colposuspension, 78% urethral bulking (p = 0.350).

Limitations: Mesh exposure was not evaluated due to the lack of validated questionnaires.

Conclusion: The AFS and TVT procedures are reported as the most successful procedures for the surgical management of SUI. Due to the associated risk of mesh complications, we recommend AFS as the procedure of choice for the surgical management of SUI.

一项比较压力性尿失禁治疗方法的中长期研究。
背景和目的:关于耻骨后带(TVT)手术的安全性仍然存在担忧。我们评估了TVT手术的疗效、满意度和长期结果,并将其与自体筋膜悬吊(AFS)、阴道悬吊和尿道膨胀手术进行了比较。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2020年12月我院三级中心所有压力性尿失禁(SUI)术后患者的前瞻性资料。患者被邀请完成三份有效问卷:国际失禁咨询阴道症状模块问卷(ICIQ- vs)、ICIQ女性下尿路症状(ICIQ- fluts)和ICIQ满意度(ICIQ- s)。Fisher的精确测试被用来评估并发症。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验评价满意度。主要发现:在研究期间进行了853例SUI手术。对395份问卷的回复进行了分析。中位随访:5.9年(范围1-10.1年)。TVT和AFS手术是最有效的手术:TVT为64%,AFS为62%,阴道悬吊为40%,尿道膨胀为26%,p局限性:由于缺乏有效的问卷,未对网状物暴露进行评估。结论:AFS和TVT是SUI最成功的手术治疗方法。由于相关的补片并发症的风险,我们推荐AFS作为SUI手术治疗的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信