Practical Approaches for Seborrheic Keratosis Treatment: Curettage Versus 532-nm Lithium Borate Laser Versus Cryotherapy: A Prospective Interventional Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Vanessa Timmermann, Sven Krengel, Petra Mrowka, Ozan Haase
{"title":"Practical Approaches for Seborrheic Keratosis Treatment: Curettage Versus 532-nm Lithium Borate Laser Versus Cryotherapy: A Prospective Interventional Study.","authors":"Vanessa Timmermann, Sven Krengel, Petra Mrowka, Ozan Haase","doi":"10.1002/lsm.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is the most prevalent benign skin tumor associated with aging, posing esthetic concerns and potential discomfort. The rising demand for cosmetic interventions prompts the exploration of effective removal methods. This study compares three treatment modalities: curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective interventional clinical study was conducted with 30 subjects, treating 123 SK using curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy. Randomized allocation and evaluations at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks were employed. Objective measures included clearance rates (assessed by a dermatologist) and blinded cosmetic ratings by 125 observers. Subjective outcomes encompassed patient-reported pain (VAS), side effects, satisfaction, and preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Curettage achieved the highest clearance rate (87.5% vs. laser: 55%, cryotherapy: 50%; p < 0.01). However, patients perceived complete healing most frequently with laser (90% vs. curettage: 87%, cryotherapy: 53%). Despite lower efficacy, 67% favored laser for future treatments, valuing minimal bleeding and no dressings. Observers rated curettage's cosmetic outcomes superior (50% vs. laser: 22.5%). Laser caused the fewest side effects (mean 0.93/lesion) but highest pain (VAS: 4.62 vs. cryotherapy: 3.85). Cryotherapy showed efficacy comparable to laser (50% vs. 55%) but more adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Curettage remains optimal for thick, hyperkeratotic SKs, enabling histopathological confirmation. The 532 nm laser, preferred subjectively for convenience, may suit small, non-hyperkeratotic lesions but warrants further validation. Propane-butane cryotherapy offers a cost-effective alternative. The discordance between patient preferences (prioritizing convenience) and clinical efficacy underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies balancing outcomes, tolerability, and cosmetic expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is the most prevalent benign skin tumor associated with aging, posing esthetic concerns and potential discomfort. The rising demand for cosmetic interventions prompts the exploration of effective removal methods. This study compares three treatment modalities: curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy.

Methods: A prospective interventional clinical study was conducted with 30 subjects, treating 123 SK using curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy. Randomized allocation and evaluations at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks were employed. Objective measures included clearance rates (assessed by a dermatologist) and blinded cosmetic ratings by 125 observers. Subjective outcomes encompassed patient-reported pain (VAS), side effects, satisfaction, and preferences.

Results: Curettage achieved the highest clearance rate (87.5% vs. laser: 55%, cryotherapy: 50%; p < 0.01). However, patients perceived complete healing most frequently with laser (90% vs. curettage: 87%, cryotherapy: 53%). Despite lower efficacy, 67% favored laser for future treatments, valuing minimal bleeding and no dressings. Observers rated curettage's cosmetic outcomes superior (50% vs. laser: 22.5%). Laser caused the fewest side effects (mean 0.93/lesion) but highest pain (VAS: 4.62 vs. cryotherapy: 3.85). Cryotherapy showed efficacy comparable to laser (50% vs. 55%) but more adverse events.

Conclusion: Curettage remains optimal for thick, hyperkeratotic SKs, enabling histopathological confirmation. The 532 nm laser, preferred subjectively for convenience, may suit small, non-hyperkeratotic lesions but warrants further validation. Propane-butane cryotherapy offers a cost-effective alternative. The discordance between patient preferences (prioritizing convenience) and clinical efficacy underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies balancing outcomes, tolerability, and cosmetic expectations.

脂流变性角化病治疗的实用方法:刮除与532纳米硼酸锂激光与冷冻治疗:一项前瞻性介入研究。
背景:脂溢性角化病(SK)是最常见的与衰老相关的良性皮肤肿瘤,引起审美问题和潜在的不适。对美容干预的不断增长的需求促使探索有效的去除方法。本研究比较了三种治疗方式:刮除、532 nm激光和丙烷-丁烷冷冻疗法。方法:对30例患者进行前瞻性介入临床研究,采用刮除、532 nm激光联合丙烷-丁烷冷冻治疗123例SK。在0、4、8和12周采用随机分配和评估。客观测量包括清除率(由皮肤科医生评估)和125名观察员的盲法化妆品评分。主观结果包括患者报告的疼痛(VAS)、副作用、满意度和偏好。结果:刮除清除率最高(87.5%),激光清除率为55%,冷冻清除率为50%;p结论:对于厚的角化过度的SKs,刮痧仍然是最佳的,可以进行组织病理学证实。532 nm激光,主观上更倾向于方便,可能适合小的,非角化过度病变,但需要进一步验证。丙烷-丁烷冷冻疗法提供了一种具有成本效益的替代方案。患者偏好(优先考虑便利性)和临床疗效之间的不一致强调了个性化治疗策略平衡结果、耐受性和美容期望的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信