Practical Approaches for Seborrheic Keratosis Treatment: Curettage Versus 532-nm Lithium Borate Laser Versus Cryotherapy: A Prospective Interventional Study.
Vanessa Timmermann, Sven Krengel, Petra Mrowka, Ozan Haase
{"title":"Practical Approaches for Seborrheic Keratosis Treatment: Curettage Versus 532-nm Lithium Borate Laser Versus Cryotherapy: A Prospective Interventional Study.","authors":"Vanessa Timmermann, Sven Krengel, Petra Mrowka, Ozan Haase","doi":"10.1002/lsm.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is the most prevalent benign skin tumor associated with aging, posing esthetic concerns and potential discomfort. The rising demand for cosmetic interventions prompts the exploration of effective removal methods. This study compares three treatment modalities: curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective interventional clinical study was conducted with 30 subjects, treating 123 SK using curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy. Randomized allocation and evaluations at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks were employed. Objective measures included clearance rates (assessed by a dermatologist) and blinded cosmetic ratings by 125 observers. Subjective outcomes encompassed patient-reported pain (VAS), side effects, satisfaction, and preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Curettage achieved the highest clearance rate (87.5% vs. laser: 55%, cryotherapy: 50%; p < 0.01). However, patients perceived complete healing most frequently with laser (90% vs. curettage: 87%, cryotherapy: 53%). Despite lower efficacy, 67% favored laser for future treatments, valuing minimal bleeding and no dressings. Observers rated curettage's cosmetic outcomes superior (50% vs. laser: 22.5%). Laser caused the fewest side effects (mean 0.93/lesion) but highest pain (VAS: 4.62 vs. cryotherapy: 3.85). Cryotherapy showed efficacy comparable to laser (50% vs. 55%) but more adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Curettage remains optimal for thick, hyperkeratotic SKs, enabling histopathological confirmation. The 532 nm laser, preferred subjectively for convenience, may suit small, non-hyperkeratotic lesions but warrants further validation. Propane-butane cryotherapy offers a cost-effective alternative. The discordance between patient preferences (prioritizing convenience) and clinical efficacy underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies balancing outcomes, tolerability, and cosmetic expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is the most prevalent benign skin tumor associated with aging, posing esthetic concerns and potential discomfort. The rising demand for cosmetic interventions prompts the exploration of effective removal methods. This study compares three treatment modalities: curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy.
Methods: A prospective interventional clinical study was conducted with 30 subjects, treating 123 SK using curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy. Randomized allocation and evaluations at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks were employed. Objective measures included clearance rates (assessed by a dermatologist) and blinded cosmetic ratings by 125 observers. Subjective outcomes encompassed patient-reported pain (VAS), side effects, satisfaction, and preferences.
Results: Curettage achieved the highest clearance rate (87.5% vs. laser: 55%, cryotherapy: 50%; p < 0.01). However, patients perceived complete healing most frequently with laser (90% vs. curettage: 87%, cryotherapy: 53%). Despite lower efficacy, 67% favored laser for future treatments, valuing minimal bleeding and no dressings. Observers rated curettage's cosmetic outcomes superior (50% vs. laser: 22.5%). Laser caused the fewest side effects (mean 0.93/lesion) but highest pain (VAS: 4.62 vs. cryotherapy: 3.85). Cryotherapy showed efficacy comparable to laser (50% vs. 55%) but more adverse events.
Conclusion: Curettage remains optimal for thick, hyperkeratotic SKs, enabling histopathological confirmation. The 532 nm laser, preferred subjectively for convenience, may suit small, non-hyperkeratotic lesions but warrants further validation. Propane-butane cryotherapy offers a cost-effective alternative. The discordance between patient preferences (prioritizing convenience) and clinical efficacy underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies balancing outcomes, tolerability, and cosmetic expectations.
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.