Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Diagnosis: A Comparative Study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S521279
Manli Zhang, Junzhi Sang, Chunpeng Yang, Haiyan Liu, Yang Xiao, Jinfeng Li, Guangwei Li
{"title":"Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Diagnosis: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Manli Zhang, Junzhi Sang, Chunpeng Yang, Haiyan Liu, Yang Xiao, Jinfeng Li, Guangwei Li","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S521279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the imaging characteristics of temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to compare their diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from 53 TMD patients and 53 healthy controls were retrospectively reviewed. All participants underwent both CBCT and MRI within a two-week interval. Key measurements included condylar dimensions and joint space assessments. The study evaluated each modality's ability to detect TMD-related abnormalities in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and masticatory muscles, such as joint space narrowing, bone changes, disc displacement, and muscle pathology. Statistical analysis compared diagnostic findings between the imaging techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image quality was comparable between CBCT and MRI (P > 0.05). Both modalities showed no significant differences in superior and anterior joint spaces between TMD and control groups, but the posterior joint space, condylar width, and anteroposterior diameter were significantly different (P < 0.05). Across all participants, significant differences were observed between CBCT and MRI measurements for superior and anterior joint spaces (P < 0.05). Among TMD patients, 69.81% had pain disorders and 30.19% had joint disorders. Both modalities demonstrated high inter- and intra-observer consistency (P < 0.05). CBCT showed high agreement for most bony abnormalities but only moderate for disc and muscle pathology. MRI had high agreement for most findings but was moderate in detecting bone hyperplasia and sclerosis. MRI detected significantly more soft tissue abnormalities, including disc displacement and joint effusion (P < 0.05), while CBCT was more effective in identifying bone hyperplasia, sclerosis, and condylar deformation (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CBCT and MRI are highly valuable tools for differentiating and assessing TMD. CBCT excels in evaluating bone-related changes, whereas MRI is superior for assessing the articular disc and soft tissue abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"3793-3802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S521279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the imaging characteristics of temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to compare their diagnostic performance.

Methods: Clinical data from 53 TMD patients and 53 healthy controls were retrospectively reviewed. All participants underwent both CBCT and MRI within a two-week interval. Key measurements included condylar dimensions and joint space assessments. The study evaluated each modality's ability to detect TMD-related abnormalities in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and masticatory muscles, such as joint space narrowing, bone changes, disc displacement, and muscle pathology. Statistical analysis compared diagnostic findings between the imaging techniques.

Results: Image quality was comparable between CBCT and MRI (P > 0.05). Both modalities showed no significant differences in superior and anterior joint spaces between TMD and control groups, but the posterior joint space, condylar width, and anteroposterior diameter were significantly different (P < 0.05). Across all participants, significant differences were observed between CBCT and MRI measurements for superior and anterior joint spaces (P < 0.05). Among TMD patients, 69.81% had pain disorders and 30.19% had joint disorders. Both modalities demonstrated high inter- and intra-observer consistency (P < 0.05). CBCT showed high agreement for most bony abnormalities but only moderate for disc and muscle pathology. MRI had high agreement for most findings but was moderate in detecting bone hyperplasia and sclerosis. MRI detected significantly more soft tissue abnormalities, including disc displacement and joint effusion (P < 0.05), while CBCT was more effective in identifying bone hyperplasia, sclerosis, and condylar deformation (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Both CBCT and MRI are highly valuable tools for differentiating and assessing TMD. CBCT excels in evaluating bone-related changes, whereas MRI is superior for assessing the articular disc and soft tissue abnormalities.

锥束计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像在颞下颌关节疾病诊断中的比较研究。
目的:探讨锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和磁共振成像(MRI)对颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)的影像学特征,并比较两者的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析53例TMD患者和53例健康对照者的临床资料。所有参与者都在两周内接受了CBCT和MRI检查。关键测量包括髁突尺寸和关节空间评估。该研究评估了每种模式检测颞下颌关节(TMJ)和咀嚼肌中tmd相关异常的能力,如关节间隙狭窄、骨改变、椎间盘移位和肌肉病理。统计学分析比较了两种成像技术的诊断结果。结果:CBCT与MRI图像质量相当(P < 0.05)。两种模式下TMD组与对照组的上、前关节间隙差异无统计学意义,但后关节间隙、髁突宽度、前后直径差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在所有参与者中,CBCT和MRI测量上关节间隙和前关节间隙之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。TMD患者中有疼痛障碍的占69.81%,有关节障碍的占30.19%。两种模式均表现出高度的观察者之间和观察者内部一致性(P < 0.05)。CBCT显示大多数骨异常高度一致,但对椎间盘和肌肉病理只有中等程度的一致。MRI对大多数发现的一致性很高,但对骨质增生和硬化症的检测不高。MRI检查椎间盘移位、关节积液等软组织异常较多(P < 0.05),而CBCT检查骨质增生、硬化症、髁突变形更有效(P < 0.05)。结论:CBCT和MRI是鉴别和评估TMD的重要工具。CBCT在评估骨相关变化方面表现出色,而MRI在评估关节盘和软组织异常方面表现出色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信