Long-term prediction of blood pressure reduction after renal denervation for arterial hypertension.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Paula Sagmeister, Garnik Asatryan, Luise Mentzel, Parham Shahidi, Natalie Fischer, Philipp Lurz, Karl-Philipp Rommel, Steffen Desch, Maximilian von Roeder, Stephan Blazek, Holger Thiele, Karl Fengler
{"title":"Long-term prediction of blood pressure reduction after renal denervation for arterial hypertension.","authors":"Paula Sagmeister, Garnik Asatryan, Luise Mentzel, Parham Shahidi, Natalie Fischer, Philipp Lurz, Karl-Philipp Rommel, Steffen Desch, Maximilian von Roeder, Stephan Blazek, Holger Thiele, Karl Fengler","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged as a potential therapy for lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients with arterial hypertension. However, approximately one-third of patients do not experience significant BP reductions, underscoring the need for reliable predictors of treatment response.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the accuracy of a previously established bivariate prediction model for prediction of 3 months BP outcomes (based on baseline 24 h BP and ascending aortic distensibility) in predicting 24 h ambulatory BP outcomes up to 12 months post-RDN.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We conducted a predefined secondary analysis from a prospective single-centre trial (NCT02772939). Patients with resistant hypertension undergoing ultrasound-based RDN were enrolled. Invasive and noninvasive arterial stiffness markers were assessed before the procedure. BP response was evaluated at 6 and 12 months via 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring. Model performance was assessed using linear regression to predict 24 h ambulatory BP change and receiver operating curve analyses to assess the accuracy for a binary systolic ambulatory BP reduction of more than 5 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients (mean age 63 ± 9 years, baseline 24 h SBP 150 ± 12 mmHg) were enrolled into this study. At 6 months, SBP decreased by 11 ± 15 mmHg, and by 7 ± 15 mmHg at 12 months (P < 0.001 for both). The prediction model demonstrated high predictive accuracy at 6 months (r2 = 0.45, AUC 0.82, P < 0.001), which decreased at 12 months (r2 = 0.26, AUC 0.79, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A noninvasive bivariate model effectively predicts BP response at 6 and 12 months post-RDN. These findings may enhance patient selection and shared decision-making, warranting further validation in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged as a potential therapy for lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients with arterial hypertension. However, approximately one-third of patients do not experience significant BP reductions, underscoring the need for reliable predictors of treatment response.

Objectives: This study evaluated the accuracy of a previously established bivariate prediction model for prediction of 3 months BP outcomes (based on baseline 24 h BP and ascending aortic distensibility) in predicting 24 h ambulatory BP outcomes up to 12 months post-RDN.

Design and methods: We conducted a predefined secondary analysis from a prospective single-centre trial (NCT02772939). Patients with resistant hypertension undergoing ultrasound-based RDN were enrolled. Invasive and noninvasive arterial stiffness markers were assessed before the procedure. BP response was evaluated at 6 and 12 months via 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring. Model performance was assessed using linear regression to predict 24 h ambulatory BP change and receiver operating curve analyses to assess the accuracy for a binary systolic ambulatory BP reduction of more than 5 mmHg.

Results: Eighty patients (mean age 63 ± 9 years, baseline 24 h SBP 150 ± 12 mmHg) were enrolled into this study. At 6 months, SBP decreased by 11 ± 15 mmHg, and by 7 ± 15 mmHg at 12 months (P < 0.001 for both). The prediction model demonstrated high predictive accuracy at 6 months (r2 = 0.45, AUC 0.82, P < 0.001), which decreased at 12 months (r2 = 0.26, AUC 0.79, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: A noninvasive bivariate model effectively predicts BP response at 6 and 12 months post-RDN. These findings may enhance patient selection and shared decision-making, warranting further validation in larger studies.

动脉高血压患者肾去神经后血压降低的长期预测。
背景:肾去神经支配(RDN)已成为降低动脉高血压患者血压(BP)的潜在治疗方法。然而,大约三分之一的患者没有经历明显的血压降低,强调需要可靠的治疗反应预测指标。目的:本研究评估了先前建立的预测3个月血压结果的双变量预测模型(基于基线24小时血压和升主动脉扩张)在预测rdn后12个月24小时动态血压结果中的准确性。设计和方法:我们对一项前瞻性单中心试验(NCT02772939)进行了预先确定的二次分析。顽固性高血压患者接受基于超声的RDN。术前评估有创和无创动脉硬度指标。通过24小时动态血压监测,在6个月和12个月时评估血压反应。采用线性回归预测24小时动态血压变化和受试者工作曲线分析评估模型性能,以评估两期收缩期动态血压降低超过5 mmHg的准确性。结果:80例患者(平均年龄63±9岁,基线24小时收缩压150±12 mmHg)纳入本研究。6个月时收缩压下降11±15 mmHg, 12个月时收缩压下降7±15 mmHg (P)结论:无创双变量模型有效预测rdn后6个月和12个月的血压反应。这些发现可能会加强患者选择和共同决策,需要在更大规模的研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信