Effect of Brazilian red propolis on microtensile bond strength and sealing ability of the methacrylate-based bonding agents.

Q2 Dentistry

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.4317/jced.62587

Gustavo César Feitosa Vidal, Edson Philippe Bezerra Balbino, José Marcos Dos Santos Oliveira, Natanael Barbosa Dos Santos, Teresa de Lisieux Guedes Ferreira Lôbo, Ticiano Gomes do Nascimento, Johnnatan Duarte de Freitas, Jeniffer Mclaine Duarte de Freitas, Isabel Cristina Celerino de Moraes Porto

{"title":"Effect of Brazilian red propolis on microtensile bond strength and sealing ability of the methacrylate-based bonding agents.","authors":"Gustavo César Feitosa Vidal, Edson Philippe Bezerra Balbino, José Marcos Dos Santos Oliveira, Natanael Barbosa Dos Santos, Teresa de Lisieux Guedes Ferreira Lôbo, Ticiano Gomes do Nascimento, Johnnatan Duarte de Freitas, Jeniffer Mclaine Duarte de Freitas, Isabel Cristina Celerino de Moraes Porto","doi":"10.4317/jced.62587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the sealing ability and microtensile bond strength of a dental adhesive with propolis.Material and methods: Red propolis extract was added to an experimental methacrylate-based adhesive (EA) at following concentrations: 100 (EA PV100), 250 (EA PV250) e 500 μg/mL (EA PV500). Single Bond Universal adhesive (SB) and EA without propolis were used as controls. The effectiveness of the dentin sealing was evaluated at nanoscale (silver uptake) and microscale (dye microleakage). Microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was measured 24 hours after the bonding process. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05).Results: EA PV500 showed the best coronal sealing, with better performance than the control and the commercial adhesive. Immediate µTBS values ranged from 28.94 + 9.25 MPa (EA PV100) to 39.09 + 9.60 MPa (SB). Comparing SB and EA with propolis, a significant decrease in µTBS was noted (p<0.05). The EA without propolis had similar performance to SB (p=1.000).Conclusions: Nanoleakage and microleakage were not eliminated in any of the groups, but EA PV500 µg/mL exhibited the best sealing ability, with superior performance compared to the control and commercial adhesive. A decrease in μTBS of AE with propolis was observed. Key words:Dentin-bonding agents, Propolis, Dental materials, Dental marginal adaptation.","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 6","pages":"e665-e674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the sealing ability and microtensile bond strength of a dental adhesive with propolis.

Material and methods: Red propolis extract was added to an experimental methacrylate-based adhesive (EA) at following concentrations: 100 (EA PV100), 250 (EA PV250) e 500 μg/mL (EA PV500). Single Bond Universal adhesive (SB) and EA without propolis were used as controls. The effectiveness of the dentin sealing was evaluated at nanoscale (silver uptake) and microscale (dye microleakage). Microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was measured 24 hours after the bonding process. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05).

Results: EA PV500 showed the best coronal sealing, with better performance than the control and the commercial adhesive. Immediate µTBS values ranged from 28.94 + 9.25 MPa (EA PV100) to 39.09 + 9.60 MPa (SB). Comparing SB and EA with propolis, a significant decrease in µTBS was noted (p<0.05). The EA without propolis had similar performance to SB (p=1.000).

Conclusions: Nanoleakage and microleakage were not eliminated in any of the groups, but EA PV500 µg/mL exhibited the best sealing ability, with superior performance compared to the control and commercial adhesive. A decrease in μTBS of AE with propolis was observed. Key words:Dentin-bonding agents, Propolis, Dental materials, Dental marginal adaptation.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

巴西红蜂胶对甲基丙烯酸酯基粘结剂微拉伸粘结强度和密封性能的影响。

背景：本研究的目的是分析蜂胶牙科胶粘剂的密封性能和微拉伸强度。材料与方法：将红蜂胶提取物分别以100 （EA PV100）、250 （EA PV250）和500 μg/mL （EA PV500）的浓度加入到实验用甲基丙烯酸酯基胶粘剂（EA）中。以单键万能胶（SB）和不含蜂胶的EA为对照。在纳米尺度（银吸收）和微观尺度（染料微泄漏）上评价牙本质密封的有效性。微拉伸粘结强度（µTBS）在粘结后24小时测量。资料采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验（α=0.05）。结果：EA PV500冠状密封效果最好，其冠状密封性能优于普通胶粘剂和商用胶粘剂。瞬时µTBS值范围从28.94 + 9.25 MPa （EA PV100）到39.09 + 9.60 MPa （SB）。将SB和EA与蜂胶进行比较，发现µTBS显著降低（pp=1.000）。结论：各组均未消除纳米渗漏和微渗漏，但EA PV500µg/mL的密封能力最好，性能优于对照和市售胶。蜂胶可降低AE的μTBS。关键词：牙本质粘结剂；蜂胶；口腔材料；

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

118

期刊介绍： Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery