Neuropsychological functioning in non-CNS cancer patients.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Charlotte Sleurs, Julianne Reilly, Emiliano Santarnecchi, Michael W Parsons
{"title":"Neuropsychological functioning in non-CNS cancer patients.","authors":"Charlotte Sleurs, Julianne Reilly, Emiliano Santarnecchi, Michael W Parsons","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2523368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a multifaceted condition, influenced by numerous neurobiological mechanisms and individual risk factors. In the non-CNS oncology population, the concept has increasingly received attention over the last few decades. Neurotoxicity of cancer treatment modalities varies, with effects that are protocol- or agent-dependent that additionally interact with patient-specific characteristics (e.g. age, sex-specific endocrine mechanisms, metabolism, brain reserve, etc.), which differently impacts individual cognitive outcomes. Importantly, CRCI encompasses both patient-reported cognitive complaints and objectively measured cognitive impairments, which may not consistently align. Individually tailored neuropsychological follow-up in oncology is therefore important, which should encompass risk profiling, patient-reported, as well as objective cognitive assessments to support psychoeducation and the development of effective interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review summarizes the historical evolution of CRCI research, biophysiological mechanisms, the clinical presentation, and the array of international guidelines for research and clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Current findings on interventions are reviewed, and innovative neuroscience-informed rehabilitation approaches are discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While these more personalized interventions might hold promise for CRCI, further research is needed to determine their true efficacy, particularly considering the potential influence of practice effects. Additionally, in-depth, large-scale, transdiagnostic, and multimodal investigations are required to advance understanding of the mechanisms of toxicity, individual risk factors, and effective intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2523368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a multifaceted condition, influenced by numerous neurobiological mechanisms and individual risk factors. In the non-CNS oncology population, the concept has increasingly received attention over the last few decades. Neurotoxicity of cancer treatment modalities varies, with effects that are protocol- or agent-dependent that additionally interact with patient-specific characteristics (e.g. age, sex-specific endocrine mechanisms, metabolism, brain reserve, etc.), which differently impacts individual cognitive outcomes. Importantly, CRCI encompasses both patient-reported cognitive complaints and objectively measured cognitive impairments, which may not consistently align. Individually tailored neuropsychological follow-up in oncology is therefore important, which should encompass risk profiling, patient-reported, as well as objective cognitive assessments to support psychoeducation and the development of effective interventions.

Methods: This review summarizes the historical evolution of CRCI research, biophysiological mechanisms, the clinical presentation, and the array of international guidelines for research and clinical care.

Results: Current findings on interventions are reviewed, and innovative neuroscience-informed rehabilitation approaches are discussed.

Conclusion: While these more personalized interventions might hold promise for CRCI, further research is needed to determine their true efficacy, particularly considering the potential influence of practice effects. Additionally, in-depth, large-scale, transdiagnostic, and multimodal investigations are required to advance understanding of the mechanisms of toxicity, individual risk factors, and effective intervention strategies.

非中枢神经系统癌症患者的神经心理功能。
癌症相关认知障碍(CRCI)是一种多方面的疾病,受多种神经生物学机制和个体危险因素的影响。在非中枢神经系统肿瘤人群中,这个概念在过去的几十年里越来越受到关注。癌症治疗方式的神经毒性各不相同,其效果依赖于方案或药物,并且与患者特异性特征(例如年龄、性别特异性内分泌机制、代谢、脑储备等)相互作用,这对个体认知结果的影响不同。重要的是,CRCI包括患者报告的认知抱怨和客观测量的认知障碍,这可能不一致。因此,在肿瘤学中,个性化的神经心理学随访是很重要的,它应该包括风险分析、患者报告以及客观的认知评估,以支持心理教育和有效干预措施的发展。方法:本文综述了CRCI研究的历史演变、生物生理机制、临床表现以及研究和临床护理的一系列国际指南。结果:回顾了目前干预措施的研究结果,并讨论了创新的神经科学康复方法。结论:虽然这些更个性化的干预措施可能对CRCI有希望,但需要进一步的研究来确定它们的真正功效,特别是考虑到实践效果的潜在影响。此外,需要深入、大规模、跨诊断和多模式的调查,以促进对毒性机制、个体危险因素和有效干预策略的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信