To chew or not to chew? Exploring the influence of scented chew toys on puppy chewing.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-06-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1602063
Rituparna Sonowal, Nathaniel J Hall, Anastasia C Stellato
{"title":"To chew or not to chew? Exploring the influence of scented chew toys on puppy chewing.","authors":"Rituparna Sonowal, Nathaniel J Hall, Anastasia C Stellato","doi":"10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1602063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chewing and mouthing are natural oral behaviors in dogs, particularly during puppyhood, yet owners report these as nuisance behaviors. The provision of appropriate enrichment items, such as scented chew toys, are often recommended to reduce these undesirable behaviors. Nevertheless, the influence of providing scented chew toys on chewing and mouthing behavior in puppies has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data on engagement levels in dogs (<i>N</i> = 29) with commercially available rubber chew toys during two 5-min sessions in an observation room, with each dog interacting with both toy types (non-scented, peanut butter-scented with squeaker) on separate days. Following the sessions, dogs were randomly assigned to be provided with either the non-scented (<i>N</i> = 15; control) and scented squeaker toy (<i>N</i> = 14) for 1 week in their household. Before and after the 1-week period, owners filled out an online questionnaire detailing how often their dog engaged in chewing and mouthing behaviors at home and they rated their agreement with various statements about their dog's chewing behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During observation sessions, puppies spent more time interacting with (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and sniffing (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) the peanut butter-scented squeaker toy in comparison to the non-scented toy. The frequency of owner's prompting the dog to engage with the toy during the observation sessions was higher for the non-scented toy than the peanut butter-scented squeaker toy (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Descriptive statistics reveal that owners in the non-scented group were more likely to agree that their dog's mouthing or nipping was problematic in the second survey (61.5%, + 16%) compared to the initial survey (45.5%), while owners in the scented group were less likely to agree (41.6%, -28.4%) compared to the initial survey (70%). Owner reports suggest no changes in the frequency of dogs chewing on undesired items and mouthing or nipping on body parts during the 1-week period for either toy type.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest that scent can enhance engagement with chew toys, and although chew toys did not influence owner perceptions, future research should evaluate the use of structured owner-implemented training strategies on mitigating unwanted chewing or mouthing behavior in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12368,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1602063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1602063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chewing and mouthing are natural oral behaviors in dogs, particularly during puppyhood, yet owners report these as nuisance behaviors. The provision of appropriate enrichment items, such as scented chew toys, are often recommended to reduce these undesirable behaviors. Nevertheless, the influence of providing scented chew toys on chewing and mouthing behavior in puppies has not been investigated.

Methods: We collected data on engagement levels in dogs (N = 29) with commercially available rubber chew toys during two 5-min sessions in an observation room, with each dog interacting with both toy types (non-scented, peanut butter-scented with squeaker) on separate days. Following the sessions, dogs were randomly assigned to be provided with either the non-scented (N = 15; control) and scented squeaker toy (N = 14) for 1 week in their household. Before and after the 1-week period, owners filled out an online questionnaire detailing how often their dog engaged in chewing and mouthing behaviors at home and they rated their agreement with various statements about their dog's chewing behavior.

Results: During observation sessions, puppies spent more time interacting with (p = 0.02) and sniffing (p < 0.0001) the peanut butter-scented squeaker toy in comparison to the non-scented toy. The frequency of owner's prompting the dog to engage with the toy during the observation sessions was higher for the non-scented toy than the peanut butter-scented squeaker toy (p < 0.0001). Descriptive statistics reveal that owners in the non-scented group were more likely to agree that their dog's mouthing or nipping was problematic in the second survey (61.5%, + 16%) compared to the initial survey (45.5%), while owners in the scented group were less likely to agree (41.6%, -28.4%) compared to the initial survey (70%). Owner reports suggest no changes in the frequency of dogs chewing on undesired items and mouthing or nipping on body parts during the 1-week period for either toy type.

Discussion: The findings suggest that scent can enhance engagement with chew toys, and although chew toys did not influence owner perceptions, future research should evaluate the use of structured owner-implemented training strategies on mitigating unwanted chewing or mouthing behavior in dogs.

嚼还是不嚼?探索香味咀嚼玩具对幼犬咀嚼的影响。
简介:咀嚼和张嘴是狗的自然口腔行为,特别是在幼犬期,然而主人报告这些是令人讨厌的行为。通常建议提供适当的强化物品,如香味咀嚼玩具,以减少这些不良行为。然而,提供有香味的咀嚼玩具对幼犬咀嚼和嘴部行为的影响尚未被调查。方法:我们在观察室收集了29只狗(N = 29)在两个5分钟的实验期间对市售橡胶咀嚼玩具的参与程度的数据,每只狗在不同的日子与两种类型的玩具(无香味、花生酱味和吱吱声)互动。实验结束后,狗被随机分配给无香味的(N = 15;对照组)和有香味的吱吱声玩具(N = 14)在他们的家庭中放置1周。在为期一周的研究前后,主人们填写了一份在线问卷,详细说明他们的狗在家里咀嚼和张嘴的频率,并对他们对狗咀嚼行为的各种陈述的同意程度进行评分。结果:在观察过程中,与无气味玩具相比,幼犬花更多的时间与花生酱气味的吱吱玩具互动(p = 0.02)和嗅探(p < 0.0001)。在观察过程中,无香味玩具的主人提示狗参与玩具的频率高于花生酱味吱吱玩具(p < 0.0001)。描述性统计数据显示,在第二次调查中,与第一次调查(45.5%)相比,无香味组的主人更有可能同意他们的狗咬嘴或咬嘴有问题(61.5%,+ 16%),而与第一次调查(70%)相比,有香味组的主人更不可能同意(41.6%,-28.4%)。主人报告显示,在一周的时间里,无论是哪种玩具,狗狗咀嚼不想要的东西、用嘴咬或咬身体部位的频率都没有变化。讨论:研究结果表明,气味可以增强狗与咀嚼玩具的互动,尽管咀嚼玩具不会影响主人的感知,但未来的研究应该评估主人实施的结构化训练策略的使用,以减少狗不必要的咀嚼或嘴巴行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying behavior. Field Chief Editor Nuno Sousa at the Instituto de Pesquisa em Ciências da Vida e da Saúde (ICVS) is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. This journal publishes major insights into the neural mechanisms of animal and human behavior, and welcomes articles studying the interplay between behavior and its neurobiological basis at all levels: from molecular biology and genetics, to morphological, biochemical, neurochemical, electrophysiological, neuroendocrine, pharmacological, and neuroimaging studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信