Drivers of antimicrobial resistance in pig production systems of Uganda.

IF 8.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Communications Earth & Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-02 DOI:10.1038/s43247-025-02506-8
Adrian Muwonge, Tadeo Kakooza, Paul C D Johnson, Lawrence Kisuule, Michael Kimaanga, Clovice Kankya, Barend Mark de Clare Bronsvoort, Tiziana Lembo
{"title":"Drivers of antimicrobial resistance in pig production systems of Uganda.","authors":"Adrian Muwonge, Tadeo Kakooza, Paul C D Johnson, Lawrence Kisuule, Michael Kimaanga, Clovice Kankya, Barend Mark de Clare Bronsvoort, Tiziana Lembo","doi":"10.1038/s43247-025-02506-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing protein demand in low- and middle-income countries may accelerate livestock intensification, antibiotic overuse and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) risk. Here, we examined Uganda's growing pig sector, tracking 70 farmers and their pigs in semi-intensive and free-range systems for a year. We investigated AMR and AMR gene abundance of 668 <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella</i> and DNA isolated from 877 faecal samples using diffusion disc-method and qPCR, respectively. Pigs in semi-intensive systems were 2.2 times more likely to exhibit AMR and had higher <i>ermB</i> levels. AMR in free-range farmers was twice that of pigs but still 1.4 times less likely than in semi-intensive systems. AMR prevalence increased by 0.76% per month. Potential transmission events were more likely on semi-intensive farms (OR = 3.16, 95% CI: 2.1-4.3, <i>P</i> < 0.001), especially when farmers had higher <i>tetQ</i> levels than pigs; the reverse was true for <i>ermB</i>. Intensified urban pig production may elevate AMR risks, underscoring the need for targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10530,"journal":{"name":"Communications Earth & Environment","volume":"6 1","pages":"517"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02506-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing protein demand in low- and middle-income countries may accelerate livestock intensification, antibiotic overuse and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) risk. Here, we examined Uganda's growing pig sector, tracking 70 farmers and their pigs in semi-intensive and free-range systems for a year. We investigated AMR and AMR gene abundance of 668 Escherichia coli, Klebsiella and DNA isolated from 877 faecal samples using diffusion disc-method and qPCR, respectively. Pigs in semi-intensive systems were 2.2 times more likely to exhibit AMR and had higher ermB levels. AMR in free-range farmers was twice that of pigs but still 1.4 times less likely than in semi-intensive systems. AMR prevalence increased by 0.76% per month. Potential transmission events were more likely on semi-intensive farms (OR = 3.16, 95% CI: 2.1-4.3, P < 0.001), especially when farmers had higher tetQ levels than pigs; the reverse was true for ermB. Intensified urban pig production may elevate AMR risks, underscoring the need for targeted interventions.

乌干达生猪生产系统中抗菌素耐药性的驱动因素。
低收入和中等收入国家不断增加的蛋白质需求可能加速牲畜集约化、抗生素过度使用和抗菌素耐药性风险。在这里,我们研究了乌干达的养猪业,跟踪了70名农民和他们在半集约化和自由放养系统中的猪一年。采用扩散圆盘法和qPCR对877份粪便标本中分离的668株大肠埃希菌、克雷伯菌和DNA进行AMR和AMR基因丰度分析。半集约化系统中的猪表现出抗菌素耐药性的可能性高出2.2倍,并且具有较高的ermB水平。自由放养农民的抗菌素耐药性是猪的两倍,但仍比半集约化系统低1.4倍。AMR患病率每月增加0.76%。潜在的传播事件在半集约化农场比猪更容易发生(OR = 3.16, 95% CI: 2.1-4.3, P tetQ水平);人民币的情况正好相反。集约化的城市生猪生产可能会增加抗菌素耐药性风险,因此需要采取有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communications Earth & Environment
Communications Earth & Environment Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
269
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications Earth & Environment is an open access journal from Nature Portfolio publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the Earth, environmental and planetary sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances that bring new insight to a specialized area in Earth science, planetary science or environmental science. Communications Earth & Environment has a 2-year impact factor of 7.9 (2022 Journal Citation Reports®). Articles published in the journal in 2022 were downloaded 1,412,858 times. Median time from submission to the first editorial decision is 8 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信