Association between blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio and 28-day mortality in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a retrospective analysis of MIMIC-IV database.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Zhen Li, Jun Xie, Qian He, Chong Li
{"title":"Association between blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio and 28-day mortality in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a retrospective analysis of MIMIC-IV database.","authors":"Zhen Li, Jun Xie, Qian He, Chong Li","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-03100-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effect of the blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio (BAR) on 28-day mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with ARF were screened and randomly divided into training and validation sets (7:3) on the basis of the ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (v.2.2) database. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality after ICU admission. The training set was categorized into the low- and high-BAR groups on the basis of the optimal BAR cutoff values for 28-day mortality determined via receiver operating characteristic analysis. The clinical significance of the BAR was evaluated by the areas under the curve (AUCs), decision curve analysis (DCA), Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curve, logistic regression analyses and subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2,766 patients were included. The 28-day mortality rate was 30.2%. The AUCs and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the BAR were AUC 0.644 (95%CI, 0.618 to 0.671) in training set. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the BAR was an independent factor affecting the prognosis of ARF in both training and validation sets. K-M curves revealed a significant difference in 28-day mortality between the low- and high-BAR groups (p < 0.001). DCA showed moderate performance. No obvious interaction was found by subgroup analysis in most subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present work revealed that elevated BAR was significantly associated with worse 28-day mortality in patients with any cause of ARF. It remains to be shown whether retrospective analysis of an independent cohort can confirm the high predictive value of BAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03100-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The effect of the blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio (BAR) on 28-day mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) is unknown.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with ARF were screened and randomly divided into training and validation sets (7:3) on the basis of the ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (v.2.2) database. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality after ICU admission. The training set was categorized into the low- and high-BAR groups on the basis of the optimal BAR cutoff values for 28-day mortality determined via receiver operating characteristic analysis. The clinical significance of the BAR was evaluated by the areas under the curve (AUCs), decision curve analysis (DCA), Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curve, logistic regression analyses and subgroup analysis.

Results: In total, 2,766 patients were included. The 28-day mortality rate was 30.2%. The AUCs and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the BAR were AUC 0.644 (95%CI, 0.618 to 0.671) in training set. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the BAR was an independent factor affecting the prognosis of ARF in both training and validation sets. K-M curves revealed a significant difference in 28-day mortality between the low- and high-BAR groups (p < 0.001). DCA showed moderate performance. No obvious interaction was found by subgroup analysis in most subgroups.

Conclusion: The present work revealed that elevated BAR was significantly associated with worse 28-day mortality in patients with any cause of ARF. It remains to be shown whether retrospective analysis of an independent cohort can confirm the high predictive value of BAR.

ICU急性呼吸衰竭患者血尿素氮/白蛋白比与28天死亡率的关系:MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性分析
目的:尿素氮白蛋白比(BAR)对重症监护病房(ICU)急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者28天死亡率的影响尚不清楚。方法:根据重症监护医学信息集市IV (v.2.2)数据库中的ICD-9和ICD-10诊断代码,筛选诊断为ARF的患者,随机分为训练集和验证集(7:3)。主要终点为ICU入院后28天死亡率。根据通过受试者工作特征分析确定的28天死亡率最佳BAR临界值,将训练集分为低BAR组和高BAR组。采用曲线下面积(aus)、决策曲线分析(DCA)、Kaplan-Meier生存曲线(K-M)、logistic回归分析和亚组分析评价BAR的临床意义。结果:共纳入2766例患者。28天死亡率为30.2%。在训练集中,BAR的AUC和95%置信区间(CI)为AUC 0.644 (95%CI, 0.618至0.671)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,BAR在训练集和验证集均是影响ARF预后的独立因素。K-M曲线显示低BAR组和高BAR组的28天死亡率有显著差异(p)。结论:目前的研究表明,在任何原因的ARF患者中,BAR升高与较差的28天死亡率显著相关。独立队列的回顾性分析是否能证实BAR的高预测价值还有待证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信