Anne Honey, Justin Newton Scanlan, Lyndal Sherwin, Haylee Zink, Karen Wells, Glenda Jessup, Nicola Hancock
{"title":"Let's Talk About Voices: randomised controlled crossover study of a resource to support mental health workers in supporting voice-hearers.","authors":"Anne Honey, Justin Newton Scanlan, Lyndal Sherwin, Haylee Zink, Karen Wells, Glenda Jessup, Nicola Hancock","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Easily accessible, impactful, evidence-based resources are needed to assist mental health workers to best support voice-hearers in managing and living well with voices. Let's Talk About Voices (LTAV) is an innovative suite of resources designed for mental health workers to use in supporting voice-hearers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of LTAV on mental health workers' self-reported capacity to work with voice-hearers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A randomised, controlled crossover design was used, with assessment at three time points. The assessment measure was co-developed by researchers, clinicians, peer workers and voice-hearers based on the aims of LTAV and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Participants were randomised into two groups. The immediate group received access to LTAV following the first assessment; the delayed group received access following the second assessment. In total, 256 mental health workers commenced the study, with 120 completing all assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between-group comparisons for change between times 1 and 2 found a significant difference with a large effect size (<i>F</i> = 40.2, <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = 0.19). Significance remained on intention-to-treat analysis (<i>F</i> = 22.9, <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = 0.08). Pairwise repeated-measures comparisons found a significant increase in scores for both groups following access to LTAV, which was sustained at follow-up. Fourteen of 24 individual items showed significant change. Changes were consistent across professions, work settings and experience working with voice-hearers, but those with less confidence in working with voice-hearers on intake showed significantly stronger improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research indicates that LTAV has the potential to substantially improve mental health workers' attitudes and confidence in supporting voice-hearers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 4","pages":"e139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Easily accessible, impactful, evidence-based resources are needed to assist mental health workers to best support voice-hearers in managing and living well with voices. Let's Talk About Voices (LTAV) is an innovative suite of resources designed for mental health workers to use in supporting voice-hearers.
Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of LTAV on mental health workers' self-reported capacity to work with voice-hearers.
Method: A randomised, controlled crossover design was used, with assessment at three time points. The assessment measure was co-developed by researchers, clinicians, peer workers and voice-hearers based on the aims of LTAV and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Participants were randomised into two groups. The immediate group received access to LTAV following the first assessment; the delayed group received access following the second assessment. In total, 256 mental health workers commenced the study, with 120 completing all assessments.
Results: Between-group comparisons for change between times 1 and 2 found a significant difference with a large effect size (F = 40.2, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.19). Significance remained on intention-to-treat analysis (F = 22.9, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.08). Pairwise repeated-measures comparisons found a significant increase in scores for both groups following access to LTAV, which was sustained at follow-up. Fourteen of 24 individual items showed significant change. Changes were consistent across professions, work settings and experience working with voice-hearers, but those with less confidence in working with voice-hearers on intake showed significantly stronger improvements.
Conclusions: This research indicates that LTAV has the potential to substantially improve mental health workers' attitudes and confidence in supporting voice-hearers.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.