Natalia Zotova, Alisho Shongo, Patricia Lelo, Nana Mbonze, Didine Kaba, Paul Ntangu, Qiuhu Shi, Adebola Adedimeji, Kathryn Anastos, Marcel Yotebieng, Viraj Patel, Jonathan Ross
{"title":"Attrition from Care and Barriers to PrEP Use Among Key Populations in Kinshasa, DRC: A Multiple Methods Study.","authors":"Natalia Zotova, Alisho Shongo, Patricia Lelo, Nana Mbonze, Didine Kaba, Paul Ntangu, Qiuhu Shi, Adebola Adedimeji, Kathryn Anastos, Marcel Yotebieng, Viraj Patel, Jonathan Ross","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04809-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Female sex workers (FSW) and gay and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is increasingly available in African countries, including the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), but data on factors influencing PrEP use remain limited. This multiple methods study examined PrEP attrition patterns and barriers to engagement among FSW and MSM in Kinshasa, DRC, using programmatic data from five sites, clinical records, and qualitative interviews. Logistic regression identified factors associated with attrition; qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Among 8,822 FSW and MSM eligible for PrEP in 2019-2021, only 24% (n = 2,070) initiated it. Of 809 FSW initiators, 33% (n = 268) were lost to follow-up by 1 month and 78% (n = 421) by 3 months. Among 1,261 MSM, 26% (n = 332) and 87% (n = 808) were lost by 1 and 3 months, respectively. For FSW, prior PrEP use and recent STIs were associated with higher attrition at 1 month. Older age, more sexual partners, income beyond sex work, and no prior PrEP use were linked to lower attrition at 3 months. Among MSM, no prior PrEP use predicted higher attrition at 1 month but lower attrition at 3 months. Qualitative findings identified stigma, side effects, dislike of daily dosing, and limited services for key populations at risk of HIV as major barriers. Findings underscore the need for improved PrEP messaging, including information on side effects decreasing over time. Raising awareness among key and general populations may reduce stigma and improve PrEP engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04809-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Female sex workers (FSW) and gay and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is increasingly available in African countries, including the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), but data on factors influencing PrEP use remain limited. This multiple methods study examined PrEP attrition patterns and barriers to engagement among FSW and MSM in Kinshasa, DRC, using programmatic data from five sites, clinical records, and qualitative interviews. Logistic regression identified factors associated with attrition; qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Among 8,822 FSW and MSM eligible for PrEP in 2019-2021, only 24% (n = 2,070) initiated it. Of 809 FSW initiators, 33% (n = 268) were lost to follow-up by 1 month and 78% (n = 421) by 3 months. Among 1,261 MSM, 26% (n = 332) and 87% (n = 808) were lost by 1 and 3 months, respectively. For FSW, prior PrEP use and recent STIs were associated with higher attrition at 1 month. Older age, more sexual partners, income beyond sex work, and no prior PrEP use were linked to lower attrition at 3 months. Among MSM, no prior PrEP use predicted higher attrition at 1 month but lower attrition at 3 months. Qualitative findings identified stigma, side effects, dislike of daily dosing, and limited services for key populations at risk of HIV as major barriers. Findings underscore the need for improved PrEP messaging, including information on side effects decreasing over time. Raising awareness among key and general populations may reduce stigma and improve PrEP engagement.
期刊介绍:
AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76