Impact of Surgical Valve Intervention on In-Hospital Outcomes in Candida Endocarditis: A Seven-Year Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Bekure B Siraw, Didien Meyahnwi, Yordanos T Tafesse, Neiberg Lima, Juveriya Yasmeen, Hemraj Paudel, Amha Weldehana, Titilope Olanipekun, Mouaz Oudih, Yonas Gebrecherkos, Mohammed Haroun
{"title":"Impact of Surgical Valve Intervention on In-Hospital Outcomes in Candida Endocarditis: A Seven-Year Analysis.","authors":"Bekure B Siraw, Didien Meyahnwi, Yordanos T Tafesse, Neiberg Lima, Juveriya Yasmeen, Hemraj Paudel, Amha Weldehana, Titilope Olanipekun, Mouaz Oudih, Yonas Gebrecherkos, Mohammed Haroun","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.06.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Candida endocarditis (CE) is a rare but highly lethal infection with limited evidence guiding its management. While surgical valve replacement or repair is often recommended, its impact on in-hospital outcomes remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2022) to identify adult admissions with CE. The primary exposure was surgical valve intervention. The primary outcomes were overall and 30-day in-hospital mortality, while the secondary outcomes included length of stay and hospitalization costs. We used multivariable logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and two causal inference methods, propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), to adjust for potential confounding. We identified 1,280 weighted CE hospitalizations, representing 0.77% of infective endocarditis cases. Among them, 228 patients (17.8%) underwent valve intervention, with a median time to surgery of 9.5 days (IQR = 15 days). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 18.8%, significantly lower in those who underwent surgery (8.3% vs. 21.1%; p < 0.001). Valve intervention was associated with reduced mortality across multivariable analysis (AOR 0.28; 95% CI: 0.13-0.55), PSM (OR<sub>PSM</sub> 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.66), IPTW (OR<sub>IPTW</sub> 0.42; 95% CI: 0.25-0.71), and Cox models (AHR 0.13; 95% CI: 0.07-0.25). However, intervention was also linked to longer hospital stays (β = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.61-2.14) and higher costs (β = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.71-2.61). Surgical valve intervention in patients with CE was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality, but at the cost of longer hospital stays and increased resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.06.019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Candida endocarditis (CE) is a rare but highly lethal infection with limited evidence guiding its management. While surgical valve replacement or repair is often recommended, its impact on in-hospital outcomes remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2022) to identify adult admissions with CE. The primary exposure was surgical valve intervention. The primary outcomes were overall and 30-day in-hospital mortality, while the secondary outcomes included length of stay and hospitalization costs. We used multivariable logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and two causal inference methods, propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), to adjust for potential confounding. We identified 1,280 weighted CE hospitalizations, representing 0.77% of infective endocarditis cases. Among them, 228 patients (17.8%) underwent valve intervention, with a median time to surgery of 9.5 days (IQR = 15 days). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 18.8%, significantly lower in those who underwent surgery (8.3% vs. 21.1%; p < 0.001). Valve intervention was associated with reduced mortality across multivariable analysis (AOR 0.28; 95% CI: 0.13-0.55), PSM (ORPSM 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.66), IPTW (ORIPTW 0.42; 95% CI: 0.25-0.71), and Cox models (AHR 0.13; 95% CI: 0.07-0.25). However, intervention was also linked to longer hospital stays (β = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.61-2.14) and higher costs (β = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.71-2.61). Surgical valve intervention in patients with CE was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality, but at the cost of longer hospital stays and increased resource utilization.

假丝酵母心内膜炎手术瓣膜干预对住院预后的影响:一项7年分析。
念珠菌心内膜炎(CE)是一种罕见但高度致命的感染,指导其治疗的证据有限。虽然外科瓣膜置换术或修复术经常被推荐,但其对住院结果的影响尚不清楚。我们使用全国住院患者样本(2016-2022)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定成人CE入院。主要暴露为瓣膜介入手术。主要结局是总体死亡率和住院30天死亡率,而次要结局包括住院时间和住院费用。我们使用多变量逻辑回归、Cox比例风险模型和两种因果推理方法,即倾向得分匹配(PSM)和处理加权逆概率(IPTW),来调整潜在的混淆。我们确定了1,280例加权CE住院病例,占感染性心内膜炎病例的0.77%。其中228例(17.8%)患者行瓣膜介入治疗,中位手术时间9.5天(IQR = 15天)。总体而言,住院死亡率为18.8%,接受手术的患者明显较低(8.3% vs. 21.1%;P < 0.001)。多变量分析表明,瓣膜干预与死亡率降低相关(AOR 0.28;95% ci: 0.13-0.55), PSM (orpsm 0.31;95% ci: 0.13-0.66), iptw (oriptw 0.42;95% CI: 0.25-0.71)和Cox模型(AHR 0.13;95% ci: 0.07-0.25)。然而,干预也与更长的住院时间有关(β = 1.86;95% CI: 1.61-2.14)和更高的成本(β = 2.10;95% ci: 1.71-2.61)。CE患者的外科瓣膜干预与住院死亡率显著降低相关,但代价是住院时间延长和资源利用率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信