Academic Democracy in the Age of Corporate Governance: Addressing Challenges to Widening Participation in University Governance

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gwilym Croucher
{"title":"Academic Democracy in the Age of Corporate Governance: Addressing Challenges to Widening Participation in University Governance","authors":"Gwilym Croucher","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forms of academic democracy, such as shared, collegial and participatory governance where students and staff have a substantive role in institutional oversight, have long been an aspiration at many universities and colleges worldwide. Yet, concrete efforts to realise self-governance often prove incompatible with the legal and fiduciary requirements of trustee boards, rector councils and the like governing contemporary higher education institutions. This has led to significant controversy at times over how universities are controlled and the extent to which their communities can have a meaningful role in governing them. It raises the question of whether widening democratic participation in university governance is possible and desirable. This conceptual study examines three core challenges to furthering academic democracy that include ambiguity over who can have legitimate oversight of academic and other matters, common logistical challenges in integrating staff and students into governance processes, as well as the limits that external influences can place on what is possible for internal governance. Drawing on deliberative democratic theory, this paper explores practical approaches to navigating these challenges through interlinked governance structures that can maximise participation and ensure a reasonable expectation of meaningful decisions within the constraints of corporate governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forms of academic democracy, such as shared, collegial and participatory governance where students and staff have a substantive role in institutional oversight, have long been an aspiration at many universities and colleges worldwide. Yet, concrete efforts to realise self-governance often prove incompatible with the legal and fiduciary requirements of trustee boards, rector councils and the like governing contemporary higher education institutions. This has led to significant controversy at times over how universities are controlled and the extent to which their communities can have a meaningful role in governing them. It raises the question of whether widening democratic participation in university governance is possible and desirable. This conceptual study examines three core challenges to furthering academic democracy that include ambiguity over who can have legitimate oversight of academic and other matters, common logistical challenges in integrating staff and students into governance processes, as well as the limits that external influences can place on what is possible for internal governance. Drawing on deliberative democratic theory, this paper explores practical approaches to navigating these challenges through interlinked governance structures that can maximise participation and ensure a reasonable expectation of meaningful decisions within the constraints of corporate governance.

公司治理时代的学术民主:应对扩大参与大学治理的挑战
学术民主的各种形式,如学生和教职员工在机构监督中发挥实质性作用的共享、合议和参与式治理,长期以来一直是全球许多大学和学院的愿望。然而,实现自治的具体努力往往被证明与管理当代高等教育机构的受托人委员会、校长理事会和类似机构的法律和信托要求不相容。这有时会导致关于如何控制大学以及他们的社区在管理大学方面可以发挥多大作用的重大争议。它提出了一个问题,即扩大大学治理中的民主参与是否可能和可取。本概念性研究考察了促进学术民主的三个核心挑战,包括谁可以对学术和其他事务进行合法监督的模糊性,将教职员工和学生纳入治理过程中的共同后勤挑战,以及外部影响可能对内部治理的可能性施加的限制。利用协商民主理论,本文探索了通过相互关联的治理结构来应对这些挑战的实用方法,这些结构可以最大限度地提高参与程度,并确保在公司治理的约束下对有意义的决策有合理的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信