Disparity in Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Amphibians and Reptiles in a Tropical Region of Central Mexico

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Biotropica Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI:10.1111/btp.70058
César A. Díaz-Marín, J. Diego Juárez-Escamilla, Aurelio Ramírez-Bautista, Israel Moreno-Lara, Claudia E. Moreno
{"title":"Disparity in Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Amphibians and Reptiles in a Tropical Region of Central Mexico","authors":"César A. Díaz-Marín,&nbsp;J. Diego Juárez-Escamilla,&nbsp;Aurelio Ramírez-Bautista,&nbsp;Israel Moreno-Lara,&nbsp;Claudia E. Moreno","doi":"10.1111/btp.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Currently, land conversion for cultivation, livestock raising, and plantations (i.e., land-use change) is a significant threat to global biodiversity, especially in tropical forests. Hence, this study analyzes the differences in taxonomic and functional alpha and beta diversities of amphibians and reptiles among three land-uses (montane cloud forest, rainforest, and pastures) in central Mexico. Hill numbers were used to calculate both alpha taxonomic and functional diversity, while beta taxonomic and functional diversity were calculated considering their turnover and nestedness components; in addition, we identify functional groups for each taxa. Amphibian taxonomic and functional diversity was similar among land-uses, whereas reptile taxonomic and functional diversity was higher in forests than in pastures. We found high beta taxonomic diversity of herpetofauna among all land-uses, where turnover was the predominant component. However, beta functional diversity was low and functional nestedness predominated in most cases. Likewise, the abundance of reptile and amphibian functional groups differed among land-use types. We suggest that species ecological resilience, homogeneous species distribution, and environmental filters may explain these taxonomic and functional diversity patterns of herpetofauna. Finally, researchers are encouraged to consistently document and publish morphological, reproductive, behavioral, and ecological data on tropical amphibians and reptiles to support current and future studies on the functional diversity of herpetofauna.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"57 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, land conversion for cultivation, livestock raising, and plantations (i.e., land-use change) is a significant threat to global biodiversity, especially in tropical forests. Hence, this study analyzes the differences in taxonomic and functional alpha and beta diversities of amphibians and reptiles among three land-uses (montane cloud forest, rainforest, and pastures) in central Mexico. Hill numbers were used to calculate both alpha taxonomic and functional diversity, while beta taxonomic and functional diversity were calculated considering their turnover and nestedness components; in addition, we identify functional groups for each taxa. Amphibian taxonomic and functional diversity was similar among land-uses, whereas reptile taxonomic and functional diversity was higher in forests than in pastures. We found high beta taxonomic diversity of herpetofauna among all land-uses, where turnover was the predominant component. However, beta functional diversity was low and functional nestedness predominated in most cases. Likewise, the abundance of reptile and amphibian functional groups differed among land-use types. We suggest that species ecological resilience, homogeneous species distribution, and environmental filters may explain these taxonomic and functional diversity patterns of herpetofauna. Finally, researchers are encouraged to consistently document and publish morphological, reproductive, behavioral, and ecological data on tropical amphibians and reptiles to support current and future studies on the functional diversity of herpetofauna.

Abstract Image

墨西哥中部热带地区两栖动物和爬行动物分类和功能多样性的差异
目前,土地转化为耕作、牲畜饲养和种植园(即土地利用变化)是对全球生物多样性的重大威胁,特别是在热带森林。因此,本研究分析了墨西哥中部三种土地利用(山地云雾林、雨林和牧场)中两栖动物和爬行动物的分类和功能α和β多样性差异。α分类多样性和功能多样性采用Hill数计算,β分类多样性和功能多样性采用周转和嵌套度计算;此外,我们还确定了每个分类群的功能群。各土地利用类型中两栖动物的分类和功能多样性相似,而森林中爬行动物的分类和功能多样性高于牧场。结果表明,各土地利用类型的爬行动物具有较高的beta分类多样性,其中周转是主要成分。但β功能多样性较低,以功能巢性为主。同样,爬行动物和两栖动物功能群的丰度在不同的土地利用类型中也存在差异。我们认为,物种生态弹性、物种均匀分布和环境过滤器可能解释了这些分类和功能多样性格局。最后,鼓励研究人员持续记录和发表热带两栖动物和爬行动物的形态、繁殖、行为和生态数据,以支持当前和未来对爬行动物功能多样性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotropica
Biotropica 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信