Does Green Governance Reflect Corporate Sustainability Performance? New Insight From G5 Countries

IF 8.3 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Kamran Mohy-ud-Din, Muhammad Shahbaz, Shoh-Jakhon Khamdamov
{"title":"Does Green Governance Reflect Corporate Sustainability Performance? New Insight From G5 Countries","authors":"Kamran Mohy-ud-Din,&nbsp;Muhammad Shahbaz,&nbsp;Shoh-Jakhon Khamdamov","doi":"10.1002/csr.3203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Green governance plays a crucial role in sustainable performance to improve the green environment; thus, how to contribute to environmental, social, and carbon emissions reporting has attracted the attention of regulators and policymakers. Green governance is often linked to sustainability performance. However, more evidence is needed on the contribution of green governance to sustainability performance. Under this lens, our present study seeks to discover the contribution of green external audits, green committees, environmental monitoring teams, and green governance practices on sustainability performance. Moreover, this study also estimated the threshold effect of green governance on the relationship between green external audits, green committees, environmental monitoring teams, and sustainability performance. A total of 905 non-financial firms listed in G5 countries were incorporated for the period 2013–2023, and data were collected from the professional Data-Stream portal. The quantile fixed effect, GMM-based quantile, and static and dynamic threshold models were employed to investigate the proposed model. Our empirical results revealed that the external assurance of green audits, committees, and governance practices improves sustainability performance. Furthermore, sustainable governance practices are a crucial determinant of ESG reporting and carbon emission performance. However, environmental monitoring teams are unable to contribute to sustainability performance. Moreover, carbon emissions and ESG performance highly responded to green external audits under green governance threshold scores of 59.23% and 59.53%, respectively. In addition, green committee decisions boost environmental and ESG performance when under green governance threshold scores surpassed 59.23% and 59.53%, respectively. Based on our research findings, this study supports the stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 4","pages":"4900-4922"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.3203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green governance plays a crucial role in sustainable performance to improve the green environment; thus, how to contribute to environmental, social, and carbon emissions reporting has attracted the attention of regulators and policymakers. Green governance is often linked to sustainability performance. However, more evidence is needed on the contribution of green governance to sustainability performance. Under this lens, our present study seeks to discover the contribution of green external audits, green committees, environmental monitoring teams, and green governance practices on sustainability performance. Moreover, this study also estimated the threshold effect of green governance on the relationship between green external audits, green committees, environmental monitoring teams, and sustainability performance. A total of 905 non-financial firms listed in G5 countries were incorporated for the period 2013–2023, and data were collected from the professional Data-Stream portal. The quantile fixed effect, GMM-based quantile, and static and dynamic threshold models were employed to investigate the proposed model. Our empirical results revealed that the external assurance of green audits, committees, and governance practices improves sustainability performance. Furthermore, sustainable governance practices are a crucial determinant of ESG reporting and carbon emission performance. However, environmental monitoring teams are unable to contribute to sustainability performance. Moreover, carbon emissions and ESG performance highly responded to green external audits under green governance threshold scores of 59.23% and 59.53%, respectively. In addition, green committee decisions boost environmental and ESG performance when under green governance threshold scores surpassed 59.23% and 59.53%, respectively. Based on our research findings, this study supports the stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory.

绿色管治是否反映企业可持续发展绩效?来自G5国家的新见解
绿色治理对改善绿色环境的可持续绩效起着至关重要的作用;因此,如何为环境、社会和碳排放报告做出贡献已经引起了监管机构和政策制定者的关注。绿色治理通常与可持续发展绩效联系在一起。然而,需要更多的证据来证明绿色治理对可持续发展绩效的贡献。在这一视角下,本研究旨在发现绿色外部审计、绿色委员会、环境监测团队和绿色治理实践对可持续发展绩效的贡献。此外,本研究还估计了绿色治理对绿色外部审计、绿色委员会、环境监测团队与可持续发展绩效之间关系的阈值效应。2013-2023年间,共有905家在G5国家上市的非金融公司被纳入研究,数据从专业的data - stream门户网站收集。采用分位数固定效应、基于gmm的分位数、静态和动态阈值模型对该模型进行了研究。我们的实证结果表明,绿色审计、委员会和治理实践的外部保证提高了可持续发展绩效。此外,可持续治理实践是ESG报告和碳排放绩效的关键决定因素。但是,环境监测队无法对可持续发展的业绩作出贡献。此外,在绿色治理阈值得分分别为59.23%和59.53%的情况下,碳排放和ESG绩效对绿色外部审计的响应较高。此外,当绿色治理阈值得分分别超过59.23%和59.53%时,绿色委员会决策提高了环境和ESG绩效。基于我们的研究结果,本研究支持利益相关者理论和合法性理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
16.30%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas. The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信