Janaína de Andrade Serrano, Lars Iversen, Laura J. Pollock
{"title":"Traits, Threats, and Popularity Explain Extinction Risk of Birds Globally","authors":"Janaína de Andrade Serrano, Lars Iversen, Laura J. Pollock","doi":"10.1111/geb.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to understand how biological traits, human-induced threats, and species popularity interact to influence the extinction risk of bird species globally. We seek to improve the accuracy of extinction risk assessments and inform conservation strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Current.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Birds.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We predict extinction risk for bird species globally based on relevant biological traits, threats (based on the IUCN Red List), and species popularity estimated from Google search frequency using a Bayesian hierarchical phylogenetic model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We find that biological traits, human-induced threats, and species popularity all explain extinction risk. Some interactions are important (e.g., larger species are more likely threatened by hunting and small-ranged and migratory species are more threatened by agriculture). We also find that more popular species are more likely to be listed as at risk than unpopular species with similar traits and threats.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study highlights the need for incorporating biological traits, anthropogenic threats and human bias into extinction risk assessments. These factors interact in complex ways, influencing the vulnerability of bird species. By accounting for these interactions, conservation efforts can be more effectively targeted to protect species with the highest risk.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
This study aims to understand how biological traits, human-induced threats, and species popularity interact to influence the extinction risk of bird species globally. We seek to improve the accuracy of extinction risk assessments and inform conservation strategies.
Location
Global.
Time Period
Current.
Major Taxa Studied
Birds.
Methods
We predict extinction risk for bird species globally based on relevant biological traits, threats (based on the IUCN Red List), and species popularity estimated from Google search frequency using a Bayesian hierarchical phylogenetic model.
Results
We find that biological traits, human-induced threats, and species popularity all explain extinction risk. Some interactions are important (e.g., larger species are more likely threatened by hunting and small-ranged and migratory species are more threatened by agriculture). We also find that more popular species are more likely to be listed as at risk than unpopular species with similar traits and threats.
Main Conclusions
Our study highlights the need for incorporating biological traits, anthropogenic threats and human bias into extinction risk assessments. These factors interact in complex ways, influencing the vulnerability of bird species. By accounting for these interactions, conservation efforts can be more effectively targeted to protect species with the highest risk.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.