Controlled-release nitrogen application mitigated soil ammonia volatilization without compromising crop yields: a case study in Sichuan Basin paddy soil

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2025-07-06 DOI:10.1002/csc2.70108
Xinyue Li, Jingyue Liang, Bing Li, Yunsong Chen, Xiaoyan Tang, Rong Huang, Changquan Wang
{"title":"Controlled-release nitrogen application mitigated soil ammonia volatilization without compromising crop yields: a case study in Sichuan Basin paddy soil","authors":"Xinyue Li,&nbsp;Jingyue Liang,&nbsp;Bing Li,&nbsp;Yunsong Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Tang,&nbsp;Rong Huang,&nbsp;Changquan Wang","doi":"10.1002/csc2.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Basal application of controlled-release urea (CRU) combined with conventional urea has been proposed to better match the temporal nitrogen (N) demand of crops, reducing fertilization costs and offering greater practical applicability. Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) volatilization is considered a major pathway of N loss in paddy, yet its response to CRU remains unclear. To evaluate the effects of partially substituting urea with CRU on NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization and agronomic performance, field experiments were conducted in rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.)–wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) and rice–rapeseed (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) rotation with different CRU substitution rates (0%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 80%, and 100%). Results showed that the 40%–100% CRU treatments effectively decreased surface water NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N content and cumulative NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization compared to other fertilization treatments. In particular, compared with other treatments, the 40% CRU treatment significantly reduced the ratio of cumulative NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization to total N input to 8.4% in the rice–wheat rotation. In the rice–rapeseed rotation, the 40% CRU treatment increased grain yield, partial factor productivity of nitrogen, and apparent N-fertilizer utilization efficiency. In the rice–wheat rotation, the 40% CRU treatment produced the tallest rice plants (52.71 cm), while in the rice–rapeseed rotation, it achieved the highest growth rate (25.97 kg hm<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>). Their results demonstrate that replacing 40% of urea with CRU could effectively reduce NH<sub>3</sub> volatilization while simultaneously enhancing rice N accumulation and agronomic performance, particularly in rice–wheat rotation system in the Chengdu Plain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"65 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.70108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Basal application of controlled-release urea (CRU) combined with conventional urea has been proposed to better match the temporal nitrogen (N) demand of crops, reducing fertilization costs and offering greater practical applicability. Ammonia (NH3) volatilization is considered a major pathway of N loss in paddy, yet its response to CRU remains unclear. To evaluate the effects of partially substituting urea with CRU on NH3 volatilization and agronomic performance, field experiments were conducted in rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rice–rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) rotation with different CRU substitution rates (0%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 80%, and 100%). Results showed that the 40%–100% CRU treatments effectively decreased surface water NH4+-N content and cumulative NH3 volatilization compared to other fertilization treatments. In particular, compared with other treatments, the 40% CRU treatment significantly reduced the ratio of cumulative NH3 volatilization to total N input to 8.4% in the rice–wheat rotation. In the rice–rapeseed rotation, the 40% CRU treatment increased grain yield, partial factor productivity of nitrogen, and apparent N-fertilizer utilization efficiency. In the rice–wheat rotation, the 40% CRU treatment produced the tallest rice plants (52.71 cm), while in the rice–rapeseed rotation, it achieved the highest growth rate (25.97 kg hm−2 day−1). Their results demonstrate that replacing 40% of urea with CRU could effectively reduce NH3 volatilization while simultaneously enhancing rice N accumulation and agronomic performance, particularly in rice–wheat rotation system in the Chengdu Plain.

控释氮肥在不影响作物产量的情况下减轻了土壤氨挥发:以四川盆地水稻土为例
控释尿素(CRU)基肥与常规尿素配合施用,可以更好地适应作物的时间氮素需求,降低施肥成本,具有更强的实用性。氨(NH3)挥发被认为是水稻氮素损失的主要途径,但其对CRU的响应尚不清楚。为评价CRU部分替代尿素对NH3挥发和农艺性能的影响,采用不同CRU替代率(0%、10%、20%、40%、80%和100%)的水稻-小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)和水稻-油菜(Brassica napus L.)轮作试验。结果表明,与其他施肥处理相比,40% ~ 100% CRU处理能有效降低地表水NH4+-N含量和累积NH3挥发量。特别是,与其他处理相比,40% CRU处理显著降低了稻麦轮作中累积NH3挥发量占总氮输入量的比例至8.4%。在水稻-油菜轮作中,40% CRU处理提高了籽粒产量、氮素部分要素生产率和氮肥表观利用率。在水稻-小麦轮作中,40% CRU处理的水稻植株最高(52.71 cm),而在水稻-油菜轮作中,其生长速度最高(25.97 kg hm - 2 day - 1)。结果表明,以CRU替代40%的尿素可有效减少NH3挥发,同时提高水稻氮素积累和农艺性能,特别是在成都平原的稻麦轮作系统中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信