PROTOCOL: Association of Antenatal Cytokine Concentrations With Neurodevelopmental Disorders of the Offspring: A Scoping Review

IF 7.1 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Imasha Upulini Jayasinghe, Hannah F. Jones, E. Scott Graham, Kyle Eggleton, Russell C. Dale, Jane M. Alsweiler
{"title":"PROTOCOL: Association of Antenatal Cytokine Concentrations With Neurodevelopmental Disorders of the Offspring: A Scoping Review","authors":"Imasha Upulini Jayasinghe,&nbsp;Hannah F. Jones,&nbsp;E. Scott Graham,&nbsp;Kyle Eggleton,&nbsp;Russell C. Dale,&nbsp;Jane M. Alsweiler","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this scoping review is to identify and map the available evidence on the association of antenatal cytokine concentrations with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) of the offspring and to inform future research avenues.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>NDDs are a heterogeneous group of conditions with onset in childhood which affect functioning due to altered brain development. NDDs have a multifactorial aetiology with genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, including the foetal intrauterine environment. Maternal immune activation (MIA) alters the intrauterine milieu of the developing foetus, and, in animal studies, has been shown to affect the brain cytoarchitecture, neuronal circuitry and glial function of the offspring. One of the mechanisms of MIA is through cytokines that may play a crucial role in affecting foetal neurodevelopment by crossing the placenta and altering cellular programming. Antenatal cytokine concentrations have the potential to be biomarkers for children at risk of NDDs, and treating a maladaptive cytokine response may reduce the risk of NDDs in these children. Therefore, it is important to understand the scope of evidence available on the association of antenatal cytokine concentration with offspring NDDs and identify the research gaps in this field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Inclusion Criteria</h3>\n \n <p>The review will consider all primary and grey literature which focuses on the review objective. The review will not be limited by any time period or any language of the sources of evidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The review will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological framework for scoping reviews. Review questions and inclusion criteria will follow the Population, Concept, Context framework. A comprehensive search will be performed in SCOPUS, MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science core collection, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL databases and trial registers. Grey literature will be searched in Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations &amp; Theses Global, Open Access Theses and Dissertations and library catalogues with the assistance of the librarian. Two independent reviewers will perform title-abstract screening and full-text screening. Eligible studies will be critically appraised using JBI critical appraisal tools. Data from eligible studies will be extracted by two reviewers using pretested data extraction tools. Findings will be presented in a final scoping review with a narrative summary and diagrammatic forms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>The mapped findings and the identified research gaps will guide further research in evaluating antenatal cytokines as an early biomarker of NDDs and the potential for antenatal therapy to reduce the risk of NDDs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Registration</h3>\n \n <p>The review protocol is registered in the Open Science Framework (Link: https://osf.io/twsuq).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.70053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this scoping review is to identify and map the available evidence on the association of antenatal cytokine concentrations with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) of the offspring and to inform future research avenues.

Introduction

NDDs are a heterogeneous group of conditions with onset in childhood which affect functioning due to altered brain development. NDDs have a multifactorial aetiology with genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, including the foetal intrauterine environment. Maternal immune activation (MIA) alters the intrauterine milieu of the developing foetus, and, in animal studies, has been shown to affect the brain cytoarchitecture, neuronal circuitry and glial function of the offspring. One of the mechanisms of MIA is through cytokines that may play a crucial role in affecting foetal neurodevelopment by crossing the placenta and altering cellular programming. Antenatal cytokine concentrations have the potential to be biomarkers for children at risk of NDDs, and treating a maladaptive cytokine response may reduce the risk of NDDs in these children. Therefore, it is important to understand the scope of evidence available on the association of antenatal cytokine concentration with offspring NDDs and identify the research gaps in this field.

Inclusion Criteria

The review will consider all primary and grey literature which focuses on the review objective. The review will not be limited by any time period or any language of the sources of evidence.

Method

The review will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological framework for scoping reviews. Review questions and inclusion criteria will follow the Population, Concept, Context framework. A comprehensive search will be performed in SCOPUS, MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science core collection, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL databases and trial registers. Grey literature will be searched in Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Open Access Theses and Dissertations and library catalogues with the assistance of the librarian. Two independent reviewers will perform title-abstract screening and full-text screening. Eligible studies will be critically appraised using JBI critical appraisal tools. Data from eligible studies will be extracted by two reviewers using pretested data extraction tools. Findings will be presented in a final scoping review with a narrative summary and diagrammatic forms.

Significance

The mapped findings and the identified research gaps will guide further research in evaluating antenatal cytokines as an early biomarker of NDDs and the potential for antenatal therapy to reduce the risk of NDDs.

Registration

The review protocol is registered in the Open Science Framework (Link: https://osf.io/twsuq).

方案:产前细胞因子浓度与后代神经发育障碍的关系:范围综述
目的本综述的目的是确定和绘制产前细胞因子浓度与后代神经发育障碍(ndd)相关的现有证据,并为未来的研究途径提供信息。ndd是一组异质性疾病,发病于儿童期,由于大脑发育改变而影响功能。ndd有多因素的病因,包括遗传、表观遗传和环境因素,包括胎儿宫内环境。母体免疫激活(MIA)改变胎儿发育的宫内环境,在动物研究中,已被证明会影响后代的脑细胞结构、神经回路和神经胶质功能。MIA的机制之一是通过细胞因子,细胞因子可能通过穿过胎盘和改变细胞程序在影响胎儿神经发育中起关键作用。产前细胞因子浓度有可能成为儿童ndd风险的生物标志物,治疗不适应的细胞因子反应可能会降低这些儿童ndd的风险。因此,了解产前细胞因子浓度与后代ndd相关的现有证据范围并确定该领域的研究空白是很重要的。纳入标准:本综述将考虑所有关注综述目标的主要文献和灰色文献。审查不受任何时间期限或证据来源的任何语言的限制。方法根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的范围评估方法框架进行评估。审查问题和纳入标准将遵循人口,概念,背景框架。将在SCOPUS、MEDLINE (Ovid)、PsycINFO (Ovid)、Web of Science核心合集、Embase (Ovid)、CINAHL数据库和试验注册库中进行全面检索。灰色文献将在b谷歌Scholar, ProQuest dissertation &;论文全球,开放存取的论文和学位论文和图书馆目录与图书管理员的协助。两位独立审稿人将进行标题摘要筛选和全文筛选。合格的研究将使用JBI关键评估工具进行严格评估。符合条件的研究的数据将由两名审稿人使用预先测试的数据提取工具提取。研究结果将以叙述摘要和图表形式在最后的范围审查中提出。绘制的发现和确定的研究空白将指导进一步研究评估产前细胞因子作为ndd的早期生物标志物,以及产前治疗降低ndd风险的潜力。审查方案在开放科学框架(链接:https://osf.io/twsuq)中注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信