Biofilm Formation on Endotracheal and Tracheostomy Tubing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Culture Data and Sampling Method

IF 3.9 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Ed Deshmukh-Reeves, Matthew Shaw, Charlotte Bilsby, Campbell W. Gourlay
{"title":"Biofilm Formation on Endotracheal and Tracheostomy Tubing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Culture Data and Sampling Method","authors":"Ed Deshmukh-Reeves,&nbsp;Matthew Shaw,&nbsp;Charlotte Bilsby,&nbsp;Campbell W. Gourlay","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biofilm formation on tracheal tubing is a key risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Endotracheal tube microbiology has been systematically reviewed, but tracheostomy tube profiles have not. Analysis of the tube-associated microbiome is not standardised, and sampling methods are varied. We compared the reported microbiomes of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes and examined the impact of sampling by tracheal aspiration or direct culture. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Knowledge for clinical microbiology studies from 2000–2024, extracting tubing type, sampling method, and the most prevalent genera identified. Genera were compared by Spearman's rank correlation and pairwise analyses by Šidák's test. Extraction from 49 studies identified 30 genera. <i>Pseudomonas</i> was the most prevalent in all conditions followed by <i>Klebsiella, Staphylococcus</i>, and <i>Acinetobacter</i>. 25 studies performed tracheal aspiration, and 22, direct culture. Two studies used both methods. Correlation was observed between endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes, and aspirates and direct cultures (Spearman's rho = 0.69; 0.59). <i>Pseudomonas</i> were more prevalent in tracheostomy tubes (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Coagulase-positive <i>Staphylococci</i> were more common in tracheal aspirates, and coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococci</i> in direct culture. The microbial profiles of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes are comparable, with <i>Pseudomonas</i> being the most common coloniser. Our analyses suggest that tracheal aspiration can effectively identify the constituents of biofilms without requiring tube removal, making it a valuable tool for clinical researchers to analyse or monitor biofilms before extubation or device failure using existing microbiology procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biofilm formation on tracheal tubing is a key risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Endotracheal tube microbiology has been systematically reviewed, but tracheostomy tube profiles have not. Analysis of the tube-associated microbiome is not standardised, and sampling methods are varied. We compared the reported microbiomes of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes and examined the impact of sampling by tracheal aspiration or direct culture. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Knowledge for clinical microbiology studies from 2000–2024, extracting tubing type, sampling method, and the most prevalent genera identified. Genera were compared by Spearman's rank correlation and pairwise analyses by Šidák's test. Extraction from 49 studies identified 30 genera. Pseudomonas was the most prevalent in all conditions followed by Klebsiella, Staphylococcus, and Acinetobacter. 25 studies performed tracheal aspiration, and 22, direct culture. Two studies used both methods. Correlation was observed between endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes, and aspirates and direct cultures (Spearman's rho = 0.69; 0.59). Pseudomonas were more prevalent in tracheostomy tubes (p < 0.0001). Coagulase-positive Staphylococci were more common in tracheal aspirates, and coagulase-negative Staphylococci in direct culture. The microbial profiles of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes are comparable, with Pseudomonas being the most common coloniser. Our analyses suggest that tracheal aspiration can effectively identify the constituents of biofilms without requiring tube removal, making it a valuable tool for clinical researchers to analyse or monitor biofilms before extubation or device failure using existing microbiology procedures.

Abstract Image

气管内和气管造口管内生物膜的形成:培养数据和抽样方法的系统回顾和荟萃分析
气管导管生物膜的形成是呼吸机相关性肺炎的关键危险因素。气管内管微生物学已被系统地回顾,但气管造口管的概况还没有。对管道相关微生物组的分析没有标准化,采样方法也多种多样。我们比较了报道的气管内和气管造口管的微生物组,并检查了通过气管吸入或直接培养取样的影响。检索PubMed、SCOPUS和Web of Knowledge 2000-2024年的临床微生物学研究,提取管材类型、采样方法和鉴定出的最流行属。属间比较采用Spearman秩相关,两两分析采用Šidák检验。从49个研究中提取,鉴定出30个属。假单胞菌在所有条件下最常见,其次是克雷伯氏菌、葡萄球菌和不动杆菌。25项研究进行了气管吸入,22项研究进行了直接培养。两项研究同时使用了这两种方法。气管内插管与气管造口管、吸入管与直接培养之间存在相关性(Spearman’s rho = 0.69;0.59)。假单胞菌在气管造瘘管中更为常见(p <;0.0001)。凝固酶阳性葡萄球菌多见于气管吸入,而凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌多见于直接培养。气管内和气管造口管的微生物特征是相似的,假单胞菌是最常见的定植菌。我们的分析表明,气管抽吸可以有效地识别生物膜的成分,而不需要拔管,使其成为临床研究人员在拔管或使用现有微生物程序失效之前分析或监测生物膜的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MicrobiologyOpen
MicrobiologyOpen MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes. MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to: - agriculture - antimicrobial resistance - astrobiology - biochemistry - biotechnology - cell and molecular biology - clinical microbiology - computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology - environmental science - evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics - food science and technology - genetics and genomics - geobiology and earth science - host-microbe interactions - infectious diseases - natural products discovery - pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry - physiology - plant pathology - veterinary microbiology We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses. The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations. MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信