{"title":"The East in wolf’s clothing. Wolf attacks correlate with but do not cause far-right voting","authors":"Nico Sonntag","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The resurgence of wolves in Germany has sparked intense debate, particularly in rural areas where wolf attacks on livestock are frequent. Prior research has linked wolf attacks to a rise in support for the far-right AfD party and the corresponding decline in Green Party votes. This note challenges such conclusions, highlighting significant methodological issues in the original difference-in-differences design. The geographic clustering of wolf attacks in East Germany aligns with other pre-existing political divides, complicating causal attribution. The analysis reveals pre-treatment voting trends that predict the probability of wolf attacks. Splitting data by East and West Germany or including diverging regional trends in the regression models nullifies or reverses most previously reported effects. This study underscores the complexities of using panel data in spatially and temporally heterogeneous contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48188,"journal":{"name":"Electoral Studies","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102957"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379425000630","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The resurgence of wolves in Germany has sparked intense debate, particularly in rural areas where wolf attacks on livestock are frequent. Prior research has linked wolf attacks to a rise in support for the far-right AfD party and the corresponding decline in Green Party votes. This note challenges such conclusions, highlighting significant methodological issues in the original difference-in-differences design. The geographic clustering of wolf attacks in East Germany aligns with other pre-existing political divides, complicating causal attribution. The analysis reveals pre-treatment voting trends that predict the probability of wolf attacks. Splitting data by East and West Germany or including diverging regional trends in the regression models nullifies or reverses most previously reported effects. This study underscores the complexities of using panel data in spatially and temporally heterogeneous contexts.
期刊介绍:
Electoral Studies is an international journal covering all aspects of voting, the central act in the democratic process. Political scientists, economists, sociologists, game theorists, geographers, contemporary historians and lawyers have common, and overlapping, interests in what causes voters to act as they do, and the consequences. Electoral Studies provides a forum for these diverse approaches. It publishes fully refereed papers, both theoretical and empirical, on such topics as relationships between votes and seats, and between election outcomes and politicians reactions; historical, sociological, or geographical correlates of voting behaviour; rational choice analysis of political acts, and critiques of such analyses.