Anna Rodum Bjøru , Rafael Cabañas , Helge Langseth , Antonio Salmerón
{"title":"Divide and conquer for causal computation","authors":"Anna Rodum Bjøru , Rafael Cabañas , Helge Langseth , Antonio Salmerón","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Structural causal models are a powerful framework for causal and counterfactual inference, extending the capabilities of traditional Bayesian networks. These models comprise endogenous and exogenous variables, where the exogenous variables frequently lack clear semantic interpretation. Exogenous variables are typically unobservable, rendering certain counterfactual queries unidentifiable. In such cases, standard inference algorithms for Bayesian networks are insufficient. Recent methods attempt to bound unidentifiable queries through imprecise estimation of exogenous probabilities. However, these methods become computationally infeasible as the cardinality of the exogenous variables increases, thereby constraining the complexity of applicable models. In this paper we study a divide-and-conquer approach that decomposes a general causal model into a set of submodels with low-cardinality exogenous variables, enabling exact calculation of any query within these submodels. By aggregating results from the submodels, efficient approximations of bounds for queries in the original model are obtained. Our proposal is able to handle models with variables of any cardinality assuming that there are no unobserved confounders. We show that the method is theoretically robust, and experimental results demonstrate that it achieves more accurate bounds with lower computational costs compared to existing techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 109520"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X25001616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Structural causal models are a powerful framework for causal and counterfactual inference, extending the capabilities of traditional Bayesian networks. These models comprise endogenous and exogenous variables, where the exogenous variables frequently lack clear semantic interpretation. Exogenous variables are typically unobservable, rendering certain counterfactual queries unidentifiable. In such cases, standard inference algorithms for Bayesian networks are insufficient. Recent methods attempt to bound unidentifiable queries through imprecise estimation of exogenous probabilities. However, these methods become computationally infeasible as the cardinality of the exogenous variables increases, thereby constraining the complexity of applicable models. In this paper we study a divide-and-conquer approach that decomposes a general causal model into a set of submodels with low-cardinality exogenous variables, enabling exact calculation of any query within these submodels. By aggregating results from the submodels, efficient approximations of bounds for queries in the original model are obtained. Our proposal is able to handle models with variables of any cardinality assuming that there are no unobserved confounders. We show that the method is theoretically robust, and experimental results demonstrate that it achieves more accurate bounds with lower computational costs compared to existing techniques.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest.
Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning.
Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.