{"title":"An insight into transient surface roughness analysis: Modelling and investigations in pneumatically configurable polishing","authors":"Tarun Verma, Onkar Chawla, Sunil Jha","doi":"10.1016/j.wear.2025.206228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the present study, a mathematical model has been developed & simulated in MATLAB to determine the effect of abrasive size on total polishing time while polishing SS304 steel. The mathematical model studies the effect of two strategies on polishing time: Constant Abrasive-size Polishing Strategy (CAPS) and Variable Abrasive-size Polishing Strategy (VAPS) during polishing cycles. The theoretical results obtained from the mathematical model are compared with the experimental results. An in-house developed Pneumatically Configurable Polishing setup has been utilised, where the tool reciprocates linearly on the workpiece. The transient curves have been plotted for each strategy to determine the reduction of surface roughness with the number of passes. It is observed that VAPS significantly reduces the number of passes required to achieve desired surface finish as compared to the CAPS. It has been observed that surface roughness saturation levels are directly proportional to abrasive size with prediction errors ranging from 2 % to 16 % compared to experimental values in case of CAPS. However, VAPS leads to a 26 % reduction in total process time thus highlighting the efficiency of varying abrasive strategy in achieving a reduced polishing time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23970,"journal":{"name":"Wear","volume":"580 ","pages":"Article 206228"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wear","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164825004971","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the present study, a mathematical model has been developed & simulated in MATLAB to determine the effect of abrasive size on total polishing time while polishing SS304 steel. The mathematical model studies the effect of two strategies on polishing time: Constant Abrasive-size Polishing Strategy (CAPS) and Variable Abrasive-size Polishing Strategy (VAPS) during polishing cycles. The theoretical results obtained from the mathematical model are compared with the experimental results. An in-house developed Pneumatically Configurable Polishing setup has been utilised, where the tool reciprocates linearly on the workpiece. The transient curves have been plotted for each strategy to determine the reduction of surface roughness with the number of passes. It is observed that VAPS significantly reduces the number of passes required to achieve desired surface finish as compared to the CAPS. It has been observed that surface roughness saturation levels are directly proportional to abrasive size with prediction errors ranging from 2 % to 16 % compared to experimental values in case of CAPS. However, VAPS leads to a 26 % reduction in total process time thus highlighting the efficiency of varying abrasive strategy in achieving a reduced polishing time.
期刊介绍:
Wear journal is dedicated to the advancement of basic and applied knowledge concerning the nature of wear of materials. Broadly, topics of interest range from development of fundamental understanding of the mechanisms of wear to innovative solutions to practical engineering problems. Authors of experimental studies are expected to comment on the repeatability of the data, and whenever possible, conduct multiple measurements under similar testing conditions. Further, Wear embraces the highest standards of professional ethics, and the detection of matching content, either in written or graphical form, from other publications by the current authors or by others, may result in rejection.