John E. Brush Jr. MD , Chungsoo Kim PharmD, PhD , Yuntian Liu MPH , Xin Xin MS , Chenxi Huang PhD , Iris J. Lundy BSN , Jordan R. Asher MD, MS , Mitsuaki Sawano MD , Patrick Young PhD , Jacob McPadden MD , Mark Anderson AS , John S. Burrows MBA , Harlan M. Krumholz MD, SM , Yuan Lu ScD
{"title":"Association Between Neighborhood-Level Social Vulnerability and Hypertension Outcomes","authors":"John E. Brush Jr. MD , Chungsoo Kim PharmD, PhD , Yuntian Liu MPH , Xin Xin MS , Chenxi Huang PhD , Iris J. Lundy BSN , Jordan R. Asher MD, MS , Mitsuaki Sawano MD , Patrick Young PhD , Jacob McPadden MD , Mark Anderson AS , John S. Burrows MBA , Harlan M. Krumholz MD, SM , Yuan Lu ScD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neighborhood-level social vulnerability is associated with hypertension prevalence and severity and with cardiovascular complications in conditions other than hypertension, but its association with cardiovascular complications in patients with hypertension is understudied.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of the study was to examine how the neighborhood-level social vulnerability index (SVI) influences cardiovascular outcomes in a large, diverse cohort of patients with hypertension.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used electronic health data to examine the association between census tract-level rankings for the SVI with a composite endpoint of incident myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In a longitudinal cohort of 330,972 patients with hypertension followed for a median of 6.6 years, the neighborhood-level SVI was significantly associated with the composite endpoint after adjustment for demographics, baseline body mass index and blood pressure (BP), and comorbidities (HR for quartile 4 [most disadvantaged group] vs quartile 1 = 1.31 [95% CI: 1.25-1.38], <em>P</em> < 0.001). Patients living in quartile 4 SVI areas had a significantly lower BP control rate compared with patients living in quartile 1 SVI areas (70.3% vs 74.8%, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Patients living in SVI quartile 4 areas were disproportionately Black (53.8%). Compared with the White race, the Black race was negatively associated with the composite outcome after adjustment for the SVI quartile, and other clinical factors (HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.86-0.92], <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Neighborhood-level social vulnerability was strongly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and poorer BP control and may be a driver of racial disparities in hypertension. These findings highlight the potential of leveraging social vulnerability indices for tailored interventions in hypertension management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 8","pages":"Article 101912"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25003321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Neighborhood-level social vulnerability is associated with hypertension prevalence and severity and with cardiovascular complications in conditions other than hypertension, but its association with cardiovascular complications in patients with hypertension is understudied.
Objectives
The aim of the study was to examine how the neighborhood-level social vulnerability index (SVI) influences cardiovascular outcomes in a large, diverse cohort of patients with hypertension.
Methods
We used electronic health data to examine the association between census tract-level rankings for the SVI with a composite endpoint of incident myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or stroke.
Results
In a longitudinal cohort of 330,972 patients with hypertension followed for a median of 6.6 years, the neighborhood-level SVI was significantly associated with the composite endpoint after adjustment for demographics, baseline body mass index and blood pressure (BP), and comorbidities (HR for quartile 4 [most disadvantaged group] vs quartile 1 = 1.31 [95% CI: 1.25-1.38], P < 0.001). Patients living in quartile 4 SVI areas had a significantly lower BP control rate compared with patients living in quartile 1 SVI areas (70.3% vs 74.8%, P < 0.001). Patients living in SVI quartile 4 areas were disproportionately Black (53.8%). Compared with the White race, the Black race was negatively associated with the composite outcome after adjustment for the SVI quartile, and other clinical factors (HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.86-0.92], P < 0.001).
Conclusions
Neighborhood-level social vulnerability was strongly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and poorer BP control and may be a driver of racial disparities in hypertension. These findings highlight the potential of leveraging social vulnerability indices for tailored interventions in hypertension management.
背景:社区层面的社会脆弱性与高血压患病率和严重程度以及高血压以外的心血管并发症有关,但其与高血压患者心血管并发症的关系尚不充分研究。目的:本研究的目的是研究社区水平的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)如何影响一个大型、多样化的高血压患者队列的心血管结局。方法:我们使用电子健康数据来检验SVI的人口普查水平排名与心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭或中风的复合终点之间的关系。结果在330,972例高血压患者的纵向队列中,随访中位数为6.6年,在调整人口统计学、基线体重指数、血压(BP)和合并症后,社区水平SVI与复合终点显著相关(四分位数4[最弱势组]vs四分位数1的HR = 1.31 [95% CI: 1.25-1.38], P <;0.001)。生活在SVI四分位数4区的患者的血压控制率明显低于生活在SVI四分位数1区的患者(70.3% vs 74.8%, P <;0.001)。生活在SVI四分位数4地区的患者中黑人比例过高(53.8%)。与白人相比,黑人与SVI四分位数调整后的综合结局及其他临床因素呈负相关(HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.86-0.92], P <;0.001)。结论社区层面的社会脆弱性与不良心血管结局和较差的血压控制密切相关,并可能是高血压种族差异的驱动因素。这些发现强调了在高血压管理中利用社会脆弱性指数进行针对性干预的潜力。