Predicting plant uptake of potential contaminants of emerging concerns using machine learning models (2018–2025): A global review

IF 7.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alexis Munyengabe, Maria Fezile Banda, Wilma Augustyn
{"title":"Predicting plant uptake of potential contaminants of emerging concerns using machine learning models (2018–2025): A global review","authors":"Alexis Munyengabe,&nbsp;Maria Fezile Banda,&nbsp;Wilma Augustyn","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This comprehensive review (2018–2025) synthesizes studies conducted on machine learning (ML) models to predict plant uptake of contaminants of emerging concerns (CECs). CECs are a global concern driven by anthropogenic activities, and their plant uptake is critical for environmental remediation and food safety. ML offers powerful predictive opportunities, fostering ecosystem preservation, human health and sustainable development. The review analyzes diverse ML algorithms, including ensemble models (random forest, gradient boosted regression trees, eXtreme gradient boosting) and deep learning (deep neural networks, recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory) alongside key predictors like soil pH, organic matter, and plant traits. It identifies dominant predictors and modelling approaches while highlighting significant research gaps: limited data, inconsistent feature reporting, and underexplored uncertainty-sensitivity coupling. A notable geographic imbalance exists, with China dominating research (82.1 % of 28 studies), followed by the USA (14.3 %) and Italy (3.6 %). Africa, particularly South Africa, is significantly underrepresented despite prevalent CEC pollution in African water bodies, including those used for irrigation, and agricultural vulnerabilities. This reveals a critical gap in global efforts to address crop contaminant risk, necessitating model retraining or transfer learning for African contexts given existing models' China-centric training. The findings underscore the urgent need for standardized databases, global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis and expanded geographic representation to enhance model generalizability and interpretability. This synthesis bridges environmental chemistry, plant physiology and artificial intelligence in predictive contaminant modelling, providing a foundation for future, globally relevant research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 106050"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259012302502122X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This comprehensive review (2018–2025) synthesizes studies conducted on machine learning (ML) models to predict plant uptake of contaminants of emerging concerns (CECs). CECs are a global concern driven by anthropogenic activities, and their plant uptake is critical for environmental remediation and food safety. ML offers powerful predictive opportunities, fostering ecosystem preservation, human health and sustainable development. The review analyzes diverse ML algorithms, including ensemble models (random forest, gradient boosted regression trees, eXtreme gradient boosting) and deep learning (deep neural networks, recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory) alongside key predictors like soil pH, organic matter, and plant traits. It identifies dominant predictors and modelling approaches while highlighting significant research gaps: limited data, inconsistent feature reporting, and underexplored uncertainty-sensitivity coupling. A notable geographic imbalance exists, with China dominating research (82.1 % of 28 studies), followed by the USA (14.3 %) and Italy (3.6 %). Africa, particularly South Africa, is significantly underrepresented despite prevalent CEC pollution in African water bodies, including those used for irrigation, and agricultural vulnerabilities. This reveals a critical gap in global efforts to address crop contaminant risk, necessitating model retraining or transfer learning for African contexts given existing models' China-centric training. The findings underscore the urgent need for standardized databases, global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis and expanded geographic representation to enhance model generalizability and interpretability. This synthesis bridges environmental chemistry, plant physiology and artificial intelligence in predictive contaminant modelling, providing a foundation for future, globally relevant research.
使用机器学习模型预测植物对潜在污染物的吸收(2018-2025):全球综述
这篇综合综述(2018-2025)综合了对机器学习(ML)模型进行的研究,以预测植物对新兴问题污染物(CECs)的吸收。由于人类活动的驱动,cec受到全球关注,植物对其的吸收对环境修复和食品安全至关重要。机器学习提供了强大的预测机会,促进生态系统保护、人类健康和可持续发展。该综述分析了各种ML算法,包括集成模型(随机森林、梯度增强回归树、极端梯度增强)和深度学习(深度神经网络、循环神经网络、长短期记忆),以及土壤pH值、有机质和植物性状等关键预测因子。它确定了主要的预测因素和建模方法,同时强调了重大的研究差距:有限的数据,不一致的特征报告,以及未充分探索的不确定性敏感性耦合。存在明显的地域不平衡,中国占主导地位(28项研究中占82.1%),其次是美国(14.3%)和意大利(3.6%)。非洲,特别是南非,尽管非洲水体(包括用于灌溉的水体)普遍存在CEC污染和农业脆弱性,但代表性明显不足。这表明全球在解决作物污染风险方面存在重大差距,鉴于现有模型以中国为中心的培训,有必要对模型进行再培训或为非洲环境进行迁移学习。研究结果强调,迫切需要标准化数据库、全球敏感性和不确定性分析以及扩大地理代表性,以提高模型的普遍性和可解释性。该合成将环境化学、植物生理学和人工智能连接到预测污染物模型中,为未来的全球相关研究提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信