Developing a framework for resilience assessment of electric vehicle charging station networks

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Omar Faruqe Hamim, Xiaowei Chen, Satish V. Ukkusuri
{"title":"Developing a framework for resilience assessment of electric vehicle charging station networks","authors":"Omar Faruqe Hamim,&nbsp;Xiaowei Chen,&nbsp;Satish V. Ukkusuri","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) demands a resilient charging infrastructure for supporting sustained usage. This study introduces a framework for generating EV charging station (EVCS) networks using weighted Voronoi diagrams. EV Charging Attractiveness Potential (ECAP) metric, reflecting varying levels of EVCS attractiveness, is developed considering visits to commercial points of interest, daily trips per person, direct current fast charger equivalents, and EV penetration rates. The resilience of EVCS networks across twelve U.S. states is assessed by analyzing relative global efficiency under random and targeted node removal strategies, including single and multiple node removals. Results indicate higher resilience against random versus targeted attacks and single versus simultaneous node removals. Using a 0.2 relative global efficiency threshold, Florida, New York, and Washington are most vulnerable, reaching the threshold with fewer than 10% of stations removed, while Colorado, North Carolina, Oregon, and Texas collapse with 10%–15% removed, and Indiana, Maine, Minnesota, and Wisconsin remain resilient until more than 15% are removed. Notably, the most critical stations do not necessarily align with areas of high EV charging demand, indicating that resilience is influenced by more than demand alone. Furthermore, the distribution of critical stations varies across different community types (i.e., city, suburban, town, and rural), highlighting the importance of local socio-demographic and geographic factors in shaping network resilience. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, underscoring the need for strategic planning and deployment of EVCS infrastructure to enhance resilience and ensure reliable access to charging facilities across diverse regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 104349"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325002406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) demands a resilient charging infrastructure for supporting sustained usage. This study introduces a framework for generating EV charging station (EVCS) networks using weighted Voronoi diagrams. EV Charging Attractiveness Potential (ECAP) metric, reflecting varying levels of EVCS attractiveness, is developed considering visits to commercial points of interest, daily trips per person, direct current fast charger equivalents, and EV penetration rates. The resilience of EVCS networks across twelve U.S. states is assessed by analyzing relative global efficiency under random and targeted node removal strategies, including single and multiple node removals. Results indicate higher resilience against random versus targeted attacks and single versus simultaneous node removals. Using a 0.2 relative global efficiency threshold, Florida, New York, and Washington are most vulnerable, reaching the threshold with fewer than 10% of stations removed, while Colorado, North Carolina, Oregon, and Texas collapse with 10%–15% removed, and Indiana, Maine, Minnesota, and Wisconsin remain resilient until more than 15% are removed. Notably, the most critical stations do not necessarily align with areas of high EV charging demand, indicating that resilience is influenced by more than demand alone. Furthermore, the distribution of critical stations varies across different community types (i.e., city, suburban, town, and rural), highlighting the importance of local socio-demographic and geographic factors in shaping network resilience. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, underscoring the need for strategic planning and deployment of EVCS infrastructure to enhance resilience and ensure reliable access to charging facilities across diverse regions.
开发电动汽车充电站网络弹性评估框架
电动汽车(ev)的日益普及需要弹性充电基础设施来支持持续使用。本文介绍了一种利用加权Voronoi图生成电动汽车充电站(EVCS)网络的框架。电动汽车充电吸引力潜力(ECAP)指标反映了不同程度的电动汽车充电吸引力,该指标考虑了商业兴趣点的访问量、人均日行程、直流快速充电器当量和电动汽车普及率。通过分析随机和有针对性的节点移除策略(包括单个和多个节点移除)下的相对全球效率,评估了美国12个州EVCS网络的弹性。结果表明,针对随机攻击和目标攻击以及单个节点与同时节点移除的弹性更高。使用0.2的相对全球效率阈值,佛罗里达州、纽约州和华盛顿州最脆弱,达到阈值时,只有不到10%的电站被拆除,而科罗拉多州、北卡罗来纳州、俄勒冈州和德克萨斯州则会因10% - 15%的电站被拆除而崩溃,印第安纳州、缅因州、明尼苏达州和威斯康星州在超过15%的电站被拆除之前保持弹性。值得注意的是,最关键的充电站并不一定与电动汽车充电需求高的地区一致,这表明弹性不仅仅受到需求的影响。此外,关键站点的分布在不同的社区类型(即城市,郊区,城镇和农村)中有所不同,突出了当地社会人口和地理因素在塑造网络弹性方面的重要性。这些发现为政策制定者和利益相关者提供了有价值的见解,强调了对EVCS基础设施进行战略规划和部署的必要性,以增强弹性,并确保在不同地区可靠地使用充电设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信