Liton Kamruzzaman , Matthew J. Diemer , Graham Currie , Allan Pimenta , Chris De Gruyter , Ian Hopkins
{"title":"Making sense of place: a new framework for place-based research in the transport realm","authors":"Liton Kamruzzaman , Matthew J. Diemer , Graham Currie , Allan Pimenta , Chris De Gruyter , Ian Hopkins","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2025.2494025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transitional process from “space” to the more complex “place”, through human-assigned locational significance, has garnered significant interest in various disciplines including psychology (e.g. place attachment, place identity), urban planning (e.g. new urbanism, placemaking), and transport (e.g. transit-oriented development, complete street). This interest has yielded valuable yet fragmented insights and definitional inconsistencies in place-based terminologies resulting in perceived disorganisation of the literature and hindrance to transdisciplinary scholarship. This study aims to bring these disciplinary scholarships into a unified conceptual framework to foster interdisciplinary discourse, understanding, and collaboration. Based on a scoping review of 194 journal articles and conference papers, 13 books, and 2 reports, the study found that places are studied from the perspective of “interpreters”, “shapers”, and “connecters”. The place-based vocabularies and methodologies as used within each of these perspectives are synthesised, defined, and framed to enable cross-disciplinary discourse. The framework outlines the strength of interlinkages among the three perspectives, with shapers serving as an intermediary between interpreters and connecters, borrowing concepts and methods from both ends of the spectrum (e.g. subjective vs. objective analysis of places). Significant gaps in research among the linkages are presented, paving the way for future collaboration and understanding of places in the context of transport research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"45 4","pages":"Pages 573-604"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164725000157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The transitional process from “space” to the more complex “place”, through human-assigned locational significance, has garnered significant interest in various disciplines including psychology (e.g. place attachment, place identity), urban planning (e.g. new urbanism, placemaking), and transport (e.g. transit-oriented development, complete street). This interest has yielded valuable yet fragmented insights and definitional inconsistencies in place-based terminologies resulting in perceived disorganisation of the literature and hindrance to transdisciplinary scholarship. This study aims to bring these disciplinary scholarships into a unified conceptual framework to foster interdisciplinary discourse, understanding, and collaboration. Based on a scoping review of 194 journal articles and conference papers, 13 books, and 2 reports, the study found that places are studied from the perspective of “interpreters”, “shapers”, and “connecters”. The place-based vocabularies and methodologies as used within each of these perspectives are synthesised, defined, and framed to enable cross-disciplinary discourse. The framework outlines the strength of interlinkages among the three perspectives, with shapers serving as an intermediary between interpreters and connecters, borrowing concepts and methods from both ends of the spectrum (e.g. subjective vs. objective analysis of places). Significant gaps in research among the linkages are presented, paving the way for future collaboration and understanding of places in the context of transport research.
期刊介绍:
Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership.
Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.