James E. Payne , Saban Nazlioglu , Ahmet Koncak , Bradley T. Ewing
{"title":"U.S. climate policy uncertainty shocks and the growth in renewable energy production","authors":"James E. Payne , Saban Nazlioglu , Ahmet Koncak , Bradley T. Ewing","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2025.100493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Investment in renewable energy production has been subject to swings in the U.S. policy stance on climate change creating uncertainty. Determining how and to what extent the renewable energy sector responds to climate policy uncertainty is relevant to understanding the energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables. This study examines the relationship between the growth in renewable energy production and its sub-components and climate policy uncertainty while accounting for oil price uncertainty and the growth in oil prices, industrial production, and carbon emissions, respectively. Utilizing generalized impulse response analysis within a vector autoregressive model framework, we find that total renewable energy production responds negatively to shocks to climate policy uncertainty but exhibits only a small positive response to oil price uncertainty. Further examination of renewable energy production by its sub-components (i.e., hydropower, biomass, geothermal, wind, and solar) shows that the time path responses to uncertainty shocks differ by sub-component. The findings suggest that policies to facilitate an energy transition by treating renewables similarly may not have the desired effects and thus should be tailored to individual sub-components to achieve targeted goals for renewable energy production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100493"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851325000376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Investment in renewable energy production has been subject to swings in the U.S. policy stance on climate change creating uncertainty. Determining how and to what extent the renewable energy sector responds to climate policy uncertainty is relevant to understanding the energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables. This study examines the relationship between the growth in renewable energy production and its sub-components and climate policy uncertainty while accounting for oil price uncertainty and the growth in oil prices, industrial production, and carbon emissions, respectively. Utilizing generalized impulse response analysis within a vector autoregressive model framework, we find that total renewable energy production responds negatively to shocks to climate policy uncertainty but exhibits only a small positive response to oil price uncertainty. Further examination of renewable energy production by its sub-components (i.e., hydropower, biomass, geothermal, wind, and solar) shows that the time path responses to uncertainty shocks differ by sub-component. The findings suggest that policies to facilitate an energy transition by treating renewables similarly may not have the desired effects and thus should be tailored to individual sub-components to achieve targeted goals for renewable energy production.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.