Robin A. Richardson , Anita Raj , Kira Downs , Irina Bergenfeld , Charis Wiltshire , Anna Dimitrova , Tarik Benmarhnia
{"title":"Impact of domestic violence legislation on reported intimate partner violence: a difference-in-differences analysis across 16 countries","authors":"Robin A. Richardson , Anita Raj , Kira Downs , Irina Bergenfeld , Charis Wiltshire , Anna Dimitrova , Tarik Benmarhnia","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a highly prevalent threat to women's health globally. Domestic violence (DV) legislation – encompassing criminal sanctions and civil remedies – has been implemented in many countries but evidence on its effects are lacking. In this study, we evaluate the impact of national-level DV legislation on married women's IPV victimization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used self-reported IPV information from 183,222 women across 16 countries, collected in repeated cross-sectional surveys (2000–2021) by the Demographic and Health Surveys, which we linked to DV legislation information from the World Bank. We evaluated impact with a staggered difference-in-differences approach and controlled for time-varying country-level factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adoption of DV legislation resulted in an increase in any reported IPV (average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) = 0.07, 95 % CI: 0.00, 0.14). All investigated types of IPV increased slightly, including physical (ATT = 0.05, 95 % CI: −0.05, 0.15), sexual (ATT = 0.04, 95 % CI: −0.03, 0.10), and psychological IPV (ATT = 0.02, 95 % CI: −0.04, 0.08), although estimates were imprecise and included the null. Further assessment shows that reported IPV increased more soon after adoption of legislation, and that women with accepting attitudes about IPV experienced the greatest increase in IPV. We did not observe effect heterogeneity by other factors including age, education level, or number of children.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Adoption of DV legislation may increase women's reported IPV victimization. Future research could explore effect heterogeneity across multiple socio-demographic subgroups and the potential mechanisms through which such policies may benefit women's health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101837"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827325000916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a highly prevalent threat to women's health globally. Domestic violence (DV) legislation – encompassing criminal sanctions and civil remedies – has been implemented in many countries but evidence on its effects are lacking. In this study, we evaluate the impact of national-level DV legislation on married women's IPV victimization.
Methods
We used self-reported IPV information from 183,222 women across 16 countries, collected in repeated cross-sectional surveys (2000–2021) by the Demographic and Health Surveys, which we linked to DV legislation information from the World Bank. We evaluated impact with a staggered difference-in-differences approach and controlled for time-varying country-level factors.
Results
Adoption of DV legislation resulted in an increase in any reported IPV (average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) = 0.07, 95 % CI: 0.00, 0.14). All investigated types of IPV increased slightly, including physical (ATT = 0.05, 95 % CI: −0.05, 0.15), sexual (ATT = 0.04, 95 % CI: −0.03, 0.10), and psychological IPV (ATT = 0.02, 95 % CI: −0.04, 0.08), although estimates were imprecise and included the null. Further assessment shows that reported IPV increased more soon after adoption of legislation, and that women with accepting attitudes about IPV experienced the greatest increase in IPV. We did not observe effect heterogeneity by other factors including age, education level, or number of children.
Conclusions
Adoption of DV legislation may increase women's reported IPV victimization. Future research could explore effect heterogeneity across multiple socio-demographic subgroups and the potential mechanisms through which such policies may benefit women's health.
期刊介绍:
SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.