A novel framework for optimal selection of vector-valued intensity measures under mainshock-aftershock sequences considering uncertainties and multi-criteria correlation

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Xu Bao , Kaiwen Xu , Zhen Li , Lu Jin , Dake Tian , Bingfeng Zhao
{"title":"A novel framework for optimal selection of vector-valued intensity measures under mainshock-aftershock sequences considering uncertainties and multi-criteria correlation","authors":"Xu Bao ,&nbsp;Kaiwen Xu ,&nbsp;Zhen Li ,&nbsp;Lu Jin ,&nbsp;Dake Tian ,&nbsp;Bingfeng Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An optimal intensity measure (IM) can effectively describe the damage potential of ground motions and accurately reflect the relationship between structural responses and seismic parameters, which plays a vital role in earthquake engineering. Although numerous studies have examined ideal IMs for mainshocks, there is limited research on the potential effect of aftershocks on the IM selection. This paper proposes a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that addresses the optimal selection of vector-valued <strong>IM</strong>s for seismic sequences by considering uncertainties and multi-criteria correlation. In this framework, to capture the nonlinear relationship between vector-valued <strong>IM</strong>s and multivariate engineering demand parameters (EDPs), several novel evaluation criteria are introduced to measure the comprehensive performance of mainshock-aftershock IM vectors. The performance criteria of each vector-valued <strong>IM</strong> candidate are then treated as a rough concept to handle uncertainties within the selection process. Finally, an advanced selection method is proposed to identify the appropriate alternative in a rough context, which can consider interdependencies among multiple criteria and avoid subjective judgment. The proposed framework is illustrated on reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures, and the effects of the number of aftershocks and the size of IM vectors are investigated to provide further guidance for the <strong>IM</strong> selection. The results provide valuable insights into the optimal selection of vector-valued <strong>IM</strong>s in the mainshock-aftershock scenario.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109655"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125004488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An optimal intensity measure (IM) can effectively describe the damage potential of ground motions and accurately reflect the relationship between structural responses and seismic parameters, which plays a vital role in earthquake engineering. Although numerous studies have examined ideal IMs for mainshocks, there is limited research on the potential effect of aftershocks on the IM selection. This paper proposes a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that addresses the optimal selection of vector-valued IMs for seismic sequences by considering uncertainties and multi-criteria correlation. In this framework, to capture the nonlinear relationship between vector-valued IMs and multivariate engineering demand parameters (EDPs), several novel evaluation criteria are introduced to measure the comprehensive performance of mainshock-aftershock IM vectors. The performance criteria of each vector-valued IM candidate are then treated as a rough concept to handle uncertainties within the selection process. Finally, an advanced selection method is proposed to identify the appropriate alternative in a rough context, which can consider interdependencies among multiple criteria and avoid subjective judgment. The proposed framework is illustrated on reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures, and the effects of the number of aftershocks and the size of IM vectors are investigated to provide further guidance for the IM selection. The results provide valuable insights into the optimal selection of vector-valued IMs in the mainshock-aftershock scenario.
考虑不确定性和多准则相关性的主余震序列矢量值强度测度优化选择新框架
最优烈度测度能够有效地描述地震动的破坏潜力,准确地反映结构响应与地震参数之间的关系,在地震工程中具有重要意义。虽然有许多研究已经检验了主震时的理想IM,但关于余震对IM选择的潜在影响的研究有限。本文提出了一种多准则决策框架,通过考虑地震序列的不确定性和多准则相关性,解决了向量值模型的最优选择问题。在此框架下,为了捕捉向量值IM与多元工程需求参数(edp)之间的非线性关系,引入了几个新的评价准则来衡量主余震IM矢量的综合性能。然后将每个向量值的候选IM的性能标准作为一个粗略的概念来处理选择过程中的不确定性。最后,提出了一种先进的选择方法,可以在粗糙的环境中识别出合适的备选方案,该方法可以考虑多个标准之间的相互依赖关系,避免主观判断。本文以钢筋混凝土框架结构为例,研究了余震次数和震源矢量大小的影响,为震源的选择提供了进一步的指导。研究结果为在主震-余震情况下矢量值IMs的最佳选择提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信