Review of treatment modalities and clinical outcome of giant saccular posterior cerebral artery aneurysms

IF 2.5 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andreas Theofanopoulos , Rajiv Kumar Khajuria , Dilaware Khan , Lucas Troude , Ben Waldau , Katharina Faust , Sajjad Muhammad
{"title":"Review of treatment modalities and clinical outcome of giant saccular posterior cerebral artery aneurysms","authors":"Andreas Theofanopoulos ,&nbsp;Rajiv Kumar Khajuria ,&nbsp;Dilaware Khan ,&nbsp;Lucas Troude ,&nbsp;Ben Waldau ,&nbsp;Katharina Faust ,&nbsp;Sajjad Muhammad","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Giant saccular posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysms are rare lesions carrying significant morbidity due to mass effect and present therapeutic challenges, mainly due to the challenging approach required for aneurysm obliteration.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>To review treatment modalities and outcomes of patients harboring giant (&gt;2.5 cm) PCA saccular aneurysms distal to the basilar bifurcation.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review through PubMed and Scopus to identify cases of giant saccular PCA aneurysms treated either microsurgically or endovascularly. Patients’ demographics, aneurysm size, preoperative and postoperative neurologic status, clinical outcomes and follow-up information were retrieved.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data from 33 studies including 55 patients were obtained. Mean patient age was 34.35 years. Mean maximum aneurysm diameter was 38.48 mm. Presentation was aneurysm rupture in 30.9 %, headache in 23.6 %, hemiparesis or tetraparesis in 12.7 %, hemianopsia in 10.9 % and hydrocephalus in 5.5 %. At least 30.9 % had significant brainstem compression. Treatment was endovascular in 23.6 %, microsurgical in 67.3 % and combined in 9.1 %. Debulking to reduce mass effect was required in 32.4 %. Preoperative mRS ranged from 1 to 5. A favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) was reported on 92.7 % of cases. Death rate was 3.6 %. The PCA was sacrificed in 40 % of the patients without severe neurologic morbidity. Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 11 years.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>Giant PCA aneurysms are amenable to both treatment modalities. PCA sacrifice may be required and is often well tolerated, presumably due to the rich collateral supply. Mass effect may necessitate debulking. PCA bypass may be required, but carries significant morbidity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425001286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Giant saccular posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysms are rare lesions carrying significant morbidity due to mass effect and present therapeutic challenges, mainly due to the challenging approach required for aneurysm obliteration.

Research question

To review treatment modalities and outcomes of patients harboring giant (>2.5 cm) PCA saccular aneurysms distal to the basilar bifurcation.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature review through PubMed and Scopus to identify cases of giant saccular PCA aneurysms treated either microsurgically or endovascularly. Patients’ demographics, aneurysm size, preoperative and postoperative neurologic status, clinical outcomes and follow-up information were retrieved.

Results

Data from 33 studies including 55 patients were obtained. Mean patient age was 34.35 years. Mean maximum aneurysm diameter was 38.48 mm. Presentation was aneurysm rupture in 30.9 %, headache in 23.6 %, hemiparesis or tetraparesis in 12.7 %, hemianopsia in 10.9 % and hydrocephalus in 5.5 %. At least 30.9 % had significant brainstem compression. Treatment was endovascular in 23.6 %, microsurgical in 67.3 % and combined in 9.1 %. Debulking to reduce mass effect was required in 32.4 %. Preoperative mRS ranged from 1 to 5. A favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) was reported on 92.7 % of cases. Death rate was 3.6 %. The PCA was sacrificed in 40 % of the patients without severe neurologic morbidity. Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 11 years.

Discussion and conclusion

Giant PCA aneurysms are amenable to both treatment modalities. PCA sacrifice may be required and is often well tolerated, presumably due to the rich collateral supply. Mass effect may necessitate debulking. PCA bypass may be required, but carries significant morbidity.
脑后巨大囊状动脉瘤的治疗方法及临床疗效综述
巨大囊状大脑后动脉(PCA)动脉瘤是一种罕见的病变,由于肿块效应和治疗上的挑战,主要是由于动脉瘤闭塞所需的方法具有挑战性。研究问题回顾基底分叉远端巨大(>2.5 cm) PCA囊状动脉瘤的治疗方法和结果。材料与方法通过PubMed和Scopus系统回顾文献,找出显微外科或血管内治疗的巨大囊状主动脉瘤病例。检索患者的人口统计学、动脉瘤大小、术前和术后神经系统状况、临床结果和随访信息。结果共获得33项研究资料,包括55例患者。患者平均年龄34.35岁。平均最大动脉瘤直径为38.48 mm。表现为动脉瘤破裂占30.9%,头痛占23.6%,偏瘫或四肢麻痹占12.7%,偏视占10.9%,脑积水占5.5%。至少30.9%的患者有明显的脑干压迫。血管内治疗占23.6%,显微手术占67.3%,联合治疗占9.1%。32.4%的患者需要减体积以减少质量效应。术前mRS为1 ~ 5。92.7%的病例预后良好(mRS 0-2)。死亡率为3.6%。在没有严重神经系统疾病的患者中,40%的PCA被切除。随访时间从1周到11年不等。讨论与结论两种治疗方式均可治疗巨大主动脉瘤。PCA的牺牲可能是必需的,并且通常是可以容忍的,大概是由于丰富的抵押品供应。质量效应可能需要减体积。主动脉动脉旁路可能是必需的,但具有显著的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信