Monitoring new and emerging technologies in order to prevent extremism and terrorist violence

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Christian Büscher , Isabel Kusche
{"title":"Monitoring new and emerging technologies in order to prevent extremism and terrorist violence","authors":"Christian Büscher ,&nbsp;Isabel Kusche","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How can technology assessment (TA) generate knowledge about the malevolent use of technology? Technology can be employed to facilitate extremist actions and terrorist activities. This suggests that any TA approach concerned with the consequences of technology can pertain to matters of civil security. This linkage and its implications for TA, responsible research and innovation, and related approaches have hardly been explored. In this paper, we propose conceptual tools to analyze the linkage and discuss the extent to which existing approaches offer methods to investigate the potentially malevolent use of technology. We propose to differentiate between opportunism (innovation), benevolence (tackling unwanted consequences), and malevolence (abuse) and to treat this threefold distinction as a problem of attributing intent. Against this backdrop, we assess the potential of TA-related approaches to produce knowledge regarding technological affordances for malevolent actors. This goal implies a broadening of the scope of existing concepts to include the assessment of technical affordances that are open for discovery by malevolent actors. Paradoxically, the lack of access to extremist/terrorist sources implies a narrowing of feasible methods to various formats of expert input.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 124274"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525003051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How can technology assessment (TA) generate knowledge about the malevolent use of technology? Technology can be employed to facilitate extremist actions and terrorist activities. This suggests that any TA approach concerned with the consequences of technology can pertain to matters of civil security. This linkage and its implications for TA, responsible research and innovation, and related approaches have hardly been explored. In this paper, we propose conceptual tools to analyze the linkage and discuss the extent to which existing approaches offer methods to investigate the potentially malevolent use of technology. We propose to differentiate between opportunism (innovation), benevolence (tackling unwanted consequences), and malevolence (abuse) and to treat this threefold distinction as a problem of attributing intent. Against this backdrop, we assess the potential of TA-related approaches to produce knowledge regarding technological affordances for malevolent actors. This goal implies a broadening of the scope of existing concepts to include the assessment of technical affordances that are open for discovery by malevolent actors. Paradoxically, the lack of access to extremist/terrorist sources implies a narrowing of feasible methods to various formats of expert input.
监测新兴技术,以防止极端主义和恐怖主义暴力
技术评估(TA)如何产生关于恶意使用技术的知识?技术可以被用来促进极端主义行动和恐怖活动。这表明,任何与技术后果有关的技术助理方法都可以适用于民事安全问题。这种联系及其对技术研究、负责任的研究和创新以及相关方法的影响几乎没有被探讨过。在本文中,我们提出了概念工具来分析这种联系,并讨论了现有方法在多大程度上提供了调查技术潜在恶意使用的方法。我们建议区分机会主义(创新)、仁慈(解决不想要的后果)和恶意(滥用),并将这三重区分视为归因于意图的问题。在此背景下,我们评估了与人工智能相关的方法在为恶意行为者提供技术支持方面的潜力。这一目标意味着扩大现有概念的范围,以包括对可能被恶意行为者发现的技术支持的评估。矛盾的是,缺乏接触极端分子/恐怖分子来源的机会意味着可行的方法缩小到各种形式的专家投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信