Challenge accepted – identifying barriers and facilitating climate change adaptation in spatial development across planning boundaries, sectors and planning levels
{"title":"Challenge accepted – identifying barriers and facilitating climate change adaptation in spatial development across planning boundaries, sectors and planning levels","authors":"M. Juschten , F. Reinwald , A. Jiricka-Pürrer","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spatial planning influences diverse sectors, including housing, industry, forestry, agriculture, tourism, and nature conservation. Accordingly, climate change adaptation (CCA) strategies stress the need to integrate climate considerations into spatial plans, programs, and response strategies. However, prior studies highlight gaps in cooperation across planning levels, sectors and borders, as well as insufficient integration of sectoral data. Therefore, this paper (i) identifies and classifies challenges arising from existing CCA efforts across planning areas, levels, and sectors; (ii) investigates structural mechanisms underlying key cooperation barriers; and (iii) outlines leverage points to promote integrated spatial planning for climate resilience. Empirical findings from qualitative interviews and workshops using backcasting methods with case studies enable comparison across governance levels and federal states, shedding light on vertical and horizontal collaboration and disciplinary perspectives.</div><div>Results show that transparent communication of trade-offs and co-development of synergistic solutions remain rare, largely driven by individual initiative rather than institutional practices or frameworks. This poses a challenge given spatial planning’s coordinating role. Nonetheless, the analysis results reveal growing interest from sectors such as water management, forestry, green space planning, and geology to formally engage with spatial planners. A key barrier is the diversity of planning instruments across governance levels and the limited capacity to interpret them cross-sectorally, reflecting broader issues around institutional and individual capacity, resources, and knowledge. This paper contributes to the discourse on enabling transformative change, identifying leverage points for a strategic, integrated spatial planning approach that incorporates CCA, informed by sectoral expertise and applicable across planning hierarchies and boundaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spatial planning influences diverse sectors, including housing, industry, forestry, agriculture, tourism, and nature conservation. Accordingly, climate change adaptation (CCA) strategies stress the need to integrate climate considerations into spatial plans, programs, and response strategies. However, prior studies highlight gaps in cooperation across planning levels, sectors and borders, as well as insufficient integration of sectoral data. Therefore, this paper (i) identifies and classifies challenges arising from existing CCA efforts across planning areas, levels, and sectors; (ii) investigates structural mechanisms underlying key cooperation barriers; and (iii) outlines leverage points to promote integrated spatial planning for climate resilience. Empirical findings from qualitative interviews and workshops using backcasting methods with case studies enable comparison across governance levels and federal states, shedding light on vertical and horizontal collaboration and disciplinary perspectives.
Results show that transparent communication of trade-offs and co-development of synergistic solutions remain rare, largely driven by individual initiative rather than institutional practices or frameworks. This poses a challenge given spatial planning’s coordinating role. Nonetheless, the analysis results reveal growing interest from sectors such as water management, forestry, green space planning, and geology to formally engage with spatial planners. A key barrier is the diversity of planning instruments across governance levels and the limited capacity to interpret them cross-sectorally, reflecting broader issues around institutional and individual capacity, resources, and knowledge. This paper contributes to the discourse on enabling transformative change, identifying leverage points for a strategic, integrated spatial planning approach that incorporates CCA, informed by sectoral expertise and applicable across planning hierarchies and boundaries.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.