Personality correlates of motivation in the art and science domains: the bright- and dark-side trait perspective

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Adrian Furnham , George Horne
{"title":"Personality correlates of motivation in the art and science domains: the bright- and dark-side trait perspective","authors":"Adrian Furnham ,&nbsp;George Horne","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In all, 2083 adults indicated their interest in, and motivation for, aesthetic and scientific activities using the Motives, Values, and Preferences Inventory (MVPI). They also completed a bright-side (Hogan Personality Inventory: HPI) and dark-side (Hogan Development Survey: HDS<em>)</em> measure. The aim was to examine age, sex and personality trait correlates of interest in the arts vs sciences. Correlations indicated that the bright-side trait Inquisitive (Openness/Curiosity) was highly correlated with both Arts and Science preferences; with the dark-side trait Imaginative (Schizotypal) being associated with Arts preferences and trait Learning Approach with Science preferences. Two hierarchical regressions (demographics, bright-side, dark-side personality) indicated that, after demographics, bright-side variables could account for 21 % of the variance for arts but 33 % for the sciences. A preference for the arts was associated with low Adjustment and Prudence, as well as being high on Colourful and Imaginative while a science preference was associated with high Inquisitiveness, Learning Approach and Boldness. These findings may inform vocational guidance and personality- based career development strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101906"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125001555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In all, 2083 adults indicated their interest in, and motivation for, aesthetic and scientific activities using the Motives, Values, and Preferences Inventory (MVPI). They also completed a bright-side (Hogan Personality Inventory: HPI) and dark-side (Hogan Development Survey: HDS) measure. The aim was to examine age, sex and personality trait correlates of interest in the arts vs sciences. Correlations indicated that the bright-side trait Inquisitive (Openness/Curiosity) was highly correlated with both Arts and Science preferences; with the dark-side trait Imaginative (Schizotypal) being associated with Arts preferences and trait Learning Approach with Science preferences. Two hierarchical regressions (demographics, bright-side, dark-side personality) indicated that, after demographics, bright-side variables could account for 21 % of the variance for arts but 33 % for the sciences. A preference for the arts was associated with low Adjustment and Prudence, as well as being high on Colourful and Imaginative while a science preference was associated with high Inquisitiveness, Learning Approach and Boldness. These findings may inform vocational guidance and personality- based career development strategies.
艺术与科学领域中动机的人格关联:光明与黑暗的特质视角
总共有2083名成年人通过动机、价值观和偏好量表(MVPI)表明了他们对美学和科学活动的兴趣和动机。他们还完成了光明面(霍根性格调查:HPI)和黑暗面(霍根发展调查:HDS)测量。其目的是研究年龄、性别和人格特征对艺术和科学的兴趣之间的相关性。相关性表明,积极面好奇(开放/好奇)与艺术和科学偏好高度相关;想象力(分裂型)与艺术偏好有关,学习方法与科学偏好有关。两个层次回归(人口统计学、光明面、黑暗面)表明,在人口统计学之后,光明面变量可能占艺术方差的21%,但占科学方差的33%。对艺术的偏好与较低的适应性和谨慎性有关,并且色彩丰富和富有想象力,而对科学的偏好与较高的好奇心,学习方法和大胆有关。这些研究结果可为职业指导和基于个性的职业发展策略提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信